Author Topic: Why do tenkeyless layouts dominate over "nav-less" designs?  (Read 808 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline spremino

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 365
  • Location: Italy
Why do tenkeyless layouts dominate over "nav-less" designs?
« on: Sun, 04 January 2026, 08:10:09 »
From a functionality point of view, a nav-less layout keeps all keys. The numpad can already act as a navigation block, but the navigation block cannot replace the numpad.

The only explanations that come to my mind are that TKL is easier to manufacture as a cut-down full-size board, or that many users simply prefer a dedicated navigation cluster. I am curious what other reasons people see, thank you.
A long space bar... what a waste of space!

Offline Findecanor

  • Posts: 5110
  • Location: Stockholm
Re: Why do tenkeyless layouts dominate over "nav-less" designs?
« Reply #1 on: Sun, 04 January 2026, 10:51:30 »
Unfortunately, it is rare that programs support key combinations with modifier keys on the numpad.
So you can't always select text and/or jump to next/previous word or top/bottom of document using the numpad the same way as with the dedicated arrow keys.

I've learned that the space around the inverse-T cluster matters for people. it helps people locate it.
Even some 65% and 75% layout keyboards have space around the arrow keys for that reason.

The inverse-T is IMHO superior ergonomically to the cross-layout embedded in the numpad. When you rest your fingers on the cluster, the middle finger — being longer — has its natural resting position in-between the Up and Down arrow keys, with equal distance to both. The numpad could be improved if the Numpad-5 key was an additional Down key, but I've never seen support for that.

I have become accustomed to having Home/End/PgUp/PgDn above the cursor keys. I use them all the time for editing text and code and wouldn't want to be without them.
I have a couple keyboards where the nav cluster above the cursor keys are 2×2 or 2×3, and the entire keyboard being one column less wide than a typical TKL, and I have had no problem going between that and a TKL.

There are lots of 65% and 75% keyboards that don't even include the full for nav keys, but instead have Ins and Del, or Del and PageUp, or PageUp/PageDown. Many even lack a Del key. I would never buy such a keyboard.
« Last Edit: Wed, 07 January 2026, 01:30:11 by Findecanor »
🍉

Offline fohat.digs

  • * Elevated Elder
  • Posts: 6559
  • Location: 35°55'N, 83°53'W
  • weird funny old guy
Re: Why do tenkeyless layouts dominate over "nav-less" designs?
« Reply #2 on: Mon, 05 January 2026, 07:55:10 »

Many even lack a Del key. I would never buy such a keyboard.


Hear, hear. "Delete" is one of the most often-used keys by my right hand. Do I make a lot of mistakes? Maybe.
 
Pete Hegseth:
"Trump changed the rules of engagement and untied the hands of war fighters .… We don't need burdensome rules of engagement that make it impossible for us to win these wars."

Offline Findecanor

  • Posts: 5110
  • Location: Stockholm
Re: Why do tenkeyless layouts dominate over "nav-less" designs?
« Reply #3 on: Mon, 05 January 2026, 13:06:19 »
BTW. There have been a couple keyboards which have overlaid inverse-T arrow keys and nav keys on top of a numeric keypad.
One of them was the Cooler Master CM Storm Quickfire TK from 2012:

315732-0
🍉

Offline HungerMechanic

  • Posts: 1450
Re: Why do tenkeyless layouts dominate over "nav-less" designs?
« Reply #4 on: Tue, 06 January 2026, 22:43:42 »
Yes. The "Nav. Cluster" is ergonomically superior.

I can use the numpad for the same functions, but the Nav. Cluster is faster and easier.

I don't buy anything without a Nav. Cluster, unless I am looking for something very compact. That's why I have TKLs. I have a 70% board, but I find myself wanting the F-row.