what makes me think is that he calls it **** with no evidence whatsoever.
I didn't use either of the mentioned mice but first of all, the R.A.T. gets pretty good reviews in general and, even more important in this very forum, there is evidence that the tracking/precision is superior to other mice: look here at post #12
http://geekhack.org/showthread.php?19427-does-anyone-make-a-full-sized-wireless-mouseAlso nobody really tested the 4g sensor yet. Nobody can show me evidence either for being as good as razer says it is, nor that is **** and has faults.
Unfortunately people tend to bash instantly on certain things.
Also if you read back, you will see that i marked the sentence "I think they should be both good mice?!" with both a ? and a ! to indicate that i didn't make a statement but an uncertain information-request.
Nevertheless, i tried to help Lester find a replacement for his dying mouse and i have personal very good experience with the Xai i own myself for about 1 year. Therefore i can give a recommendation for it.
And i also showed my interest in those 2 particular mice as they seem to have the greatest technical improvements on the field of (gaming) mice. I don't know if these improvements work and even if they are useful, but both the R.A.T. and the 4g sensor are novelties. That makes them interesting and definitely worth a look at.
I don't mind to be proven that these are "****" but to do so, some evidence (or personal experience) has to be shown to me. Only saying that they are not good, doesn't mean anything. (Except when you are the #1 mice expert in the world.

)