Author Topic: Mini Model M (concept)  (Read 6715 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline sealcouch

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 171
Mini Model M (concept)
« on: Tue, 14 August 2012, 23:42:31 »
I made this in about 15 minutes.

I lack the technical prowess to physically make something like this, but still, the idea of a tiny buckling spring board is beyond awesome.
« Last Edit: Wed, 15 August 2012, 00:00:13 by sealcouch »

Offline jdcarpe

  • * Curator
  • Posts: 8852
  • Location: Odessa, TX
  • Live long, and prosper.
Re: Mini Model M.
« Reply #1 on: Tue, 14 August 2012, 23:45:38 »
I'm buying! LOL.
KMAC :: LZ-GH :: WASD CODE :: WASD v2 :: GH60 :: Alps64 :: JD45 :: IBM Model M :: IBM 4704 "Pingmaster"

http://jd40.info :: http://jd45.info


in memoriam

"When I was a kid, I used to take things apart and never put them back together."

Offline Okita

  • Posts: 46
Re: Mini Model M.
« Reply #2 on: Tue, 14 August 2012, 23:55:32 »
You made this... but you didn't? Mind blown.

Offline sealcouch

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 171
Re: Mini Model M.
« Reply #3 on: Tue, 14 August 2012, 23:57:37 »
You made this... but you didn't? Mind blown.
I added the word physically. Just for you.

Offline deleet

  • Posts: 12
Re: Mini Model M (concept)
« Reply #4 on: Wed, 15 August 2012, 00:25:01 »
Just take my money!

Offline mich

  • Posts: 156
Re: Mini Model M (concept)
« Reply #5 on: Wed, 15 August 2012, 00:58:23 »
This kind of thing really needs the Sun/HHKB layout - backspace in place of \|, esc in place of `~, `~ and \| in place of backspace.

IMO it would look even more awesome without a case - just the steel plate with keys and a tiny PCB with some modern microcontroller with integrated USB support. Maybe even it would be possible to route wires under this black plastic plate and hide all electronics behind enter and shift. :cool:
« Last Edit: Wed, 15 August 2012, 01:06:14 by mich »

Offline MMB

  • I no longer use this account. Please email me.
  • Posts: 1162
Re: Mini Model M (concept)
« Reply #6 on: Wed, 15 August 2012, 01:06:43 »
Clickclack already did it :P

Offline hasu

  • Posts: 3475
  • Location: Tokyo, Japan
  • @tmk
    • tmk keyboard firmware project
Re: Mini Model M (concept)
« Reply #7 on: Wed, 15 August 2012, 08:19:42 »
Yeah, clickclack's micro M is best looking buckling spring keyboard ever. But all images of it on GH seem to have gone.

My mod M is a little lager and ugly case but shares the concept.
http://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=29483

Offline tipo33

  • Posts: 395
  • Location: www.leningrad.spb.ru
  • "Ski"
Re: Mini Model M (concept)
« Reply #8 on: Wed, 15 August 2012, 10:58:39 »
Did you cut a membrane for that?  Is there a buildlog somwhere?
KM4COL    R.I.P.  SmallFry

Offline hashbaz

  • Grand Ancient One
  • * Moderator Emeritus
  • Posts: 5057
  • Location: SF Bae Area
Re: Mini Model M (concept)
« Reply #9 on: Wed, 15 August 2012, 11:02:44 »
I would love something like this.  See also mkawa's Project SSK thread.

Offline rknize

  • * Administrator
  • Posts: 1731
  • Location: Chicago
    • metaruss
Re: Mini Model M (concept)
« Reply #10 on: Wed, 15 August 2012, 11:51:45 »
I've thought about doing exactly this to a Unicomp Ultra Classic.  The problem is the utility of the result.  To be a useful "Buckling Poker", it needs Fn layering.  This could be done with a Teensy or something, but it would be a fair amount of work.  The Ultra Classic is 104, so you have the extra keys you need for Fn.  Another idea is to start with a Model F XT, which needs a Teensy anyway.
Russ

Offline jkercado

  • Posts: 310
  • Location: San Antonio TX
  • Green XM clickclacker
Re: Mini Model M (concept)
« Reply #11 on: Wed, 15 August 2012, 11:54:22 »
Reminds me of the PCjr keyboard!


Ducky 1087XM Green | Unicomp Ultra Classic Black | IBM M4 | 1989 IBM Model M | Genius i200 | Cherry G84-4100 | Microsoft Arc Keyboard

Offline tipo33

  • Posts: 395
  • Location: www.leningrad.spb.ru
  • "Ski"
Re: Mini Model M (concept)
« Reply #12 on: Wed, 15 August 2012, 12:00:50 »
Were the PCjr keyboards mechanical?
KM4COL    R.I.P.  SmallFry

Offline jkercado

  • Posts: 310
  • Location: San Antonio TX
  • Green XM clickclacker
Re: Mini Model M (concept)
« Reply #13 on: Wed, 15 August 2012, 12:04:07 »
Were the PCjr keyboards mechanical?

Nah, rubber domes. I wrote thousands of lines of BASIC with one of those puppies! I wonder if that keyboard is still at my mom's house. It's been quite a while!

Ducky 1087XM Green | Unicomp Ultra Classic Black | IBM M4 | 1989 IBM Model M | Genius i200 | Cherry G84-4100 | Microsoft Arc Keyboard

Offline tipo33

  • Posts: 395
  • Location: www.leningrad.spb.ru
  • "Ski"
Re: Mini Model M (concept)
« Reply #14 on: Wed, 15 August 2012, 12:06:56 »
Were the PCjr keyboards mechanical?

Nah, rubber domes. I wrote thousands of lines of BASIC with one of those puppies! I wonder if that keyboard is still at my mom's house. It's been quite a while!
Sad,  I was hoping they were BS.
KM4COL    R.I.P.  SmallFry

Offline jkercado

  • Posts: 310
  • Location: San Antonio TX
  • Green XM clickclacker
Re: Mini Model M (concept)
« Reply #15 on: Wed, 15 August 2012, 12:10:21 »
Were the PCjr keyboards mechanical?

Nah, rubber domes. I wrote thousands of lines of BASIC with one of those puppies! I wonder if that keyboard is still at my mom's house. It's been quite a while!
Sad,  I was hoping they were BS.

That would've been awesome, but would've driven my parents crazy with the click clack!

I got used to buckling springs early in my career. I started off as an IBM System/36 developer. So I used those wonderful terminal keyboards for about a decade. Now, thanks to Unicomp, I can relive the pleasure of typing on buckling springs. Love them.

Ducky 1087XM Green | Unicomp Ultra Classic Black | IBM M4 | 1989 IBM Model M | Genius i200 | Cherry G84-4100 | Microsoft Arc Keyboard

Offline dorkvader

  • Posts: 6288
  • Location: Boston area
  • all about the "hack" in "geekhack"
Re: Mini Model M (concept)
« Reply #16 on: Wed, 15 August 2012, 20:08:55 »
Where's kishy when you need him? I really like his "kishsaver" model F
http://kishy.dyndns.org/stuff/keyboards/

Offline lowpoly

  • Posts: 1749
Re: Mini Model M (concept)
« Reply #17 on: Tue, 21 August 2012, 15:56:17 »
Yeah, clickclack's micro M is best looking buckling spring keyboard ever. But all images of it on GH seem to have gone.
Do you have a link? My search-fu failed me.

Edit: found it.
« Last Edit: Tue, 21 August 2012, 16:11:56 by lowpoly »

Miniguru thread at GH // The Apple M0110 Today

Offline hasu

  • Posts: 3475
  • Location: Tokyo, Japan
  • @tmk
    • tmk keyboard firmware project
Re: Mini Model M (concept)
« Reply #18 on: Tue, 21 August 2012, 16:18:36 »
This post had a image before.

Clickclack's  "Model M mini-micro??? Whuuuuaaah?"
http://geekhack.org/showthread.php?10347-Model-M-mini-micro-Whuuuuaaah&p=195628&viewfull=1#post195628

Offline joneslee85

  • HHKB Scrub JP
  • Posts: 399
  • Location: Sydney, Australia
  • Professional Rubyist programmer!
    • Ruby Journal
Re: Mini Model M (concept)
« Reply #19 on: Mon, 30 December 2013, 22:51:25 »
it's pretty decent for 15mins photoshop touch up job. Wish unicomp could make keyboard like this
TOO MANY KEYBOARDS THAT I COULD NOT COUNT! BUT I AM STILL USING MY MODEL F77

Offline SpAmRaY

  • NOT a Moderator
  • * Certified Spammer
  • Posts: 14667
  • Location: ¯\(°_o)/¯
  • because reasons.......
Re: Mini Model M (concept)
« Reply #20 on: Mon, 30 December 2013, 22:54:31 »
Holy necro bump batman!

Offline Pacifist

  • Report me *again* if there are gifs in my sig
  • * Elevated Elder
  • Posts: 3599
  • Location: Cali
  • on hiatus
Re: Mini Model M (concept)
« Reply #21 on: Mon, 30 December 2013, 22:58:40 »
HOW THE HELL DO PEOPLE FIND **** LIKE THIS

Offline terran5992

  • Posts: 1485
  • Location: Singapore
  • One With The Cup Rubber
Re: Mini Model M (concept)
« Reply #22 on: Mon, 30 December 2013, 23:03:06 »
Bringing back a year old thread

Listokei Custom  |  HHKB Pro 2  |  Topre Realforce 103UBH  |  Armageddon MKA-3


Offline rowdy

  • HHKB Hapster
  • * Erudite Elder
  • Posts: 21175
  • Location: melbourne.vic.au
  • Missed another sale.
Re: Mini Model M (concept)
« Reply #23 on: Tue, 31 December 2013, 01:25:53 »
There's even a warning that the last post was more than 180 days ago, or something like that.

Should that warning be made more obvious, perhaps?

Or the post require moderator approval if the preceding post is more than 6 months old?

It's all very well to bump an extremely old post, but chances are that whoever started the original thread is no longer here.
"Because keyboards are accessories to PC makers, they focus on minimizing the manufacturing costs. But that’s incorrect. It’s in HHKB’s slogan, but when America’s cowboys were in the middle of a trip and their horse died, they would leave the horse there. But even if they were in the middle of a desert, they would take their saddle with them. The horse was a consumable good, but the saddle was an interface that their bodies had gotten used to. In the same vein, PCs are consumable goods, while keyboards are important interfaces." - Eiiti Wada

NEC APC-H4100E | Ducky DK9008 Shine MX blue LED red | Ducky DK9008 Shine MX blue LED green | Link 900243-08 | CM QFR MX black | KeyCool 87 white MX reds | HHKB 2 Pro | Model M 02-Mar-1993 | Model M 29-Nov-1995 | CM Trigger (broken) | CM QFS MX green | Ducky DK9087 Shine 3 TKL Yellow Edition MX black | Lexmark SSK 21-Apr-1994 | IBM SSK 13-Oct-1987 | CODE TKL MX clear | Model M 122 01-Jun-1988

Ị̸͚̯̲́ͤ̃͑̇̑ͯ̊̂͟ͅs̞͚̩͉̝̪̲͗͊ͪ̽̚̚ ̭̦͖͕̑́͌ͬͩ͟t̷̻͔̙̑͟h̹̠̼͋ͤ͋i̤̜̣̦̱̫͈͔̞ͭ͑ͥ̌̔s̬͔͎̍̈ͥͫ̐̾ͣ̔̇͘ͅ ̩̘̼͆̐̕e̞̰͓̲̺̎͐̏ͬ̓̅̾͠͝ͅv̶̰͕̱̞̥̍ͣ̄̕e͕͙͖̬̜͓͎̤̊ͭ͐͝ṇ̰͎̱̤̟̭ͫ͌̌͢͠ͅ ̳̥̦ͮ̐ͤ̎̊ͣ͡͡n̤̜̙̺̪̒͜e̶̻̦̿ͮ̂̀c̝̘̝͖̠̖͐ͨͪ̈̐͌ͩ̀e̷̥͇̋ͦs̢̡̤ͤͤͯ͜s͈̠̉̑͘a̱͕̗͖̳̥̺ͬͦͧ͆̌̑͡r̶̟̖̈͘ỷ̮̦̩͙͔ͫ̾ͬ̔ͬͮ̌?̵̘͇͔͙ͥͪ͞ͅ

Offline Pacifist

  • Report me *again* if there are gifs in my sig
  • * Elevated Elder
  • Posts: 3599
  • Location: Cali
  • on hiatus
Re: Mini Model M (concept)
« Reply #24 on: Tue, 31 December 2013, 01:27:36 »
There's even a warning that the last post was more than 180 days ago, or something like that.

Should that warning be made more obvious, perhaps?

Or the post require moderator approval if the preceding post is more than 6 months old?

It's all very well to bump an extremely old post, but chances are that whoever started the original thread is no longer here.

There is warning on 120 days. But you can disable it.