Ok, sorry then gender-unknown squirrel. I haven't dug any hole though...my point has already been proven. If you have arguments then raise them.
That would be gender-irrelevant, really, but it's labouring the point.
As for /your/ point, I fail to see what it is, let alone any proof of it's correctness. All I see is assertions that your worldview is correct, and labelling those who attempt to argue any one of those assertions as trolls. I'm feeling relatively indulgent, though, so I'll assume you're merely young and idealistic (I've been there myself, as, I suspect, has Malphas) as opposed to any of the other obvious reasons.
As an aside, you brought up Orwell's "1984" in passing earlier; it's probably worth reading "Homage to Catalonia" to understand *why* he wrote it (and "Animal Farm", amongst other works). It's also worth reading in order to understand the likely outcome of a truly anarchist state.
Anyway. Let's have a look at your argument, as I see it. Please feel free to correct me if I've misunderstood.
- The machinery of state, in any form, is inherently corrupt and based on the forcible and violent subjugation of the citizenry.
So, let's look at the machinery of state.
Fiscal policy and state-controlled currencies. Looking at things with the bitter and jaded eye of a 40+ year old radical left-winger, I see fiscal policy outside of the US, being more or less controlled by "the markets", the effectively unregulated (at least at an individual state level) embodiment of of the capitalist zero-sum-game. Try asking a Greek or a Spaniard how much control their government has on fiscal policy, for example. And the Euro itself is controlled t an extra-state level; it's not the only one. Even without that outlook, I see no realistic "other option" to a state-controlled fiscal policy, a baseline to relative value. As for currencies, you are perfectly free to use one, multiple, or none at all. Bartering still works admirably at a low level, although you may find it hard to barter for a new SUV with eggs laid by your chickens; commerces /will/ insist on using those pesky baselines. That said, you're free to live outside the system, although doing so may require certain sacrifices.
State-supplied healthcare funded by taxes extorted from the masses at gunpoint. I assume your "other option" is "Pay or don't get treated". Ignoring the irony that doing so would involve using the hated state-controlled currency, I fail to see that "If you're poor you die" is in any way humane. You /were/ arguing that the state is inhumane, right?
System of law, and means of policing it, again, funded by taxes ... Again, as a radical left-winger (some way to the left of the Communist party, if truth be told), I've had a certain amount of "contact" with the sharp end of the legal systems of the UK and several other European states. I somehow managed not to get bothered by the US police. Oddly enough, I managed not to be tortured, wrongfully imprisoned (or, at least, not for long), or executed. The courts showed themselves to be decent institutions based on upholding the law, and not on petty political point-scoring. I didn't even get guns waved at me. However, when I've needed them, the police (at least in the UK, France and the US) have shown themselves to be at least helpful, and in certain cases effective and even, in one case (although probably by accident) efficient. Admittedly, my "white" status has meant that I don't have to deal with the levels of police racism my asian friend did, but even that sorry incident had a happy outcome (2 rather unpleasant louts kicked off the 'force). Even putting aside the questions of how to police it, any society requires a consistent and globally applicable system of law, and I can't see any way of having that without somehow codifying the rules and putting in place some system for applying those rules. I can't see how such a system, even at some hypothetical "village assizes" level isn't going to end up looking like a piece of state machinery, to be honest. At some point it's going to end up /punishing/ people, after all.
There's more, obviously, but your eyes are probably glazing over at this point.
Yes, there are unjust and / or outdated laws. Yes, there are unjust taxes levied, and most tax systems are "porous" such that it's the poor that pay the most. Yes, there are , have been, and will be states which are utterly despicable. None of this, however, leads /even me/ to believe that this somehow means that the concept of "state' is universally wrong.
As for a "right to live", no, you don't have one. You're merely one insignificant cell in what amounts to a cancer on the planet. You weren't "born into slavery" either.
