Tonight is probably the only night I'll be up late due to Giants game. Unless he decides to do something daytime weekend, I'm pretty sure I'm boned on clackvent.
That is okay, though. Hoping I win 420 and I think I posted a bit in the flux thread even though I never typed what 209384092790 people typed.
You were actually the top poster in the Flux thread, I did the tally 
1. absyrd 29
2. Glenmael 27
3. romevi 21
3. rowdy 21
4. SamirD 13
5?. nubbinator 11
I had no idea I posted that much as well 
~Edit:
That's only if my method was correct:
Hit the 'print' button on the thread, search for 'Post by: ', grab all the 'Post by: 's, filter in excel, tally it up.
Well, I'm not anywhere in that list. But I do have a fairly high post count on the forum in general. So, I hate to burst you guys' bubble, but yeah, it was forum post count that Mr. Clackman was referring to.
Well, you know him better than we do. I guess it made more sense to do it the thread-count instead of global post-count as doing it the latter would take more work and could have someone rig the system. Unless CC counted it immediately after closing the thread, I can theoretically post any number of replies and rack up a good amount, having a large number of posts in a short amount of time, all the while hoping CC hasn't counted yet.
Having a high post count indicates that CC wanted the Keypacitors to go to old members anyway, so, in that case, why create a thread about it? Seems more fun to have participation in one thread count as something than nothing.
But, like I said, you know him better than we do and maybe there's something else you know that we don't.
Or you're just messin' with us.
Or all of the above.
