Well, it does make a lot of sense. As I heard one guy point out on the radio, the German government doesn't fly the Nazi flag over their buildings.
Nor do we fly the union jack...
I'm not sure I'd put the Brits on the same level, though (despite their cooking).
[The Nazis and Confederates] are not even comparable The Nazis was a party that had taken over the whole country with force, and then invaded other countries... The Confederates were a collection of states that wanted to get out of a union, not take over the union - as such it is a symbol of independence.
Dunno about that. Mostly it was about slavery—capturing entire villages of people at gunpoint, transporting them to other places, and treating them like animals. Hmm, that
does sound familiar.
Unlike the Nazis, slave owners didn't have a policy of murdering their "possessions". After all, they paid good money for them. However, because slaves weren't considered people, their "owners" were free to treat them however they wished—including raping them (and considering any resulting children slaves, too) and killing them for insubordination, trying to escape, or any other reason.
Consider too than nearly half of kidnapped Africans died before they even reached the U.S., because of the horrendous conditions on slave ships. (BTW, this, and not some kind of genetic predisposition, is why so many American blacks are unusually strong and athletic: The weaker ones were "weeded out" in a gruesome, artificial evolutionary process.)
So if you ask me, the Confederate flag, while not
quite as terrible a reminder as the Nazi flag, isn't far behind. YMMV of course.
By the way, the Nazi flag is illegal in Germany. Even using it for journalistic or quasi-documentary purposes is skirting the rules.
That's encouraging. If they can own up to their history, maybe we can too, once we're willing to stop romanticizing it.