Looking at Numpad kit take rates in these Massdrop sets, one could argue it benefits the majority to offer Numpad as a separate kit. But as a 104 user, I'm all for including Numpad in Base.
Show Image
More
Nice graph! Love your work everywhere. :thumb:
That said, you know
...it's just bunch of numbers without proper interpretation. :p
More
Based on the graph, one could also argue that numpad pick rate is significantly higher for SA, which doesn't have stupidly high split kit prices like GMK. So it might actually hurt the majority because people that want numpad won't join to pay 40$ premium.
It's just data, you can interpret it in myriad of ways ;-)
I completely agree that interpretation is key. This graph is just my summary of data for one piece of the puzzle. I only hope it is helpful for those making or discussing future decisions. It's not nearly enough information for
me to confidently declare what will always be best for everyone.
Other important factors are not addressed at all. For example, what are the cost differences between integrating and separating? For GMK the cost of a few large kits is significantly less than many small ones, but what are the exact ratios for each manufacturer? I have no idea.
Past performance doesn't predict future results.
In general, separate appears to be the best choice with SP (SA and DSA profiles). But did it end up being the best choice for Danger Zone
specifically? I don't know.
Also, deciding the cost tipping point for separate versus integrated is entirely subjective. Is it 30% increase for Numpad purchasers vs. 5% savings for Base-only? Or +10%/-10%? Any Base kit cost reduction is best for buyers that don't use Numpad. Conversely, lower Numpad kit cost is best for those who do. Why would an individual care what is best for anyone else?
TL;DR You're right. By itself, a graph summarizing historical data doesn't really say anything. But perhaps it helps some decide what to say for the future.