12
« Last post by tp4tissue on Wed, 28 October 2026, 06:10:45 »
The PROBLEM with grimni's VVeidel.
She's pro nv(lr.
There is no such thing as nv(lr power. There is only Nv(lr weapns.
They hide the SINGULAR real utility to the refinement backend behind civilian nv(lr.
So, her policy is fundamentally, we need nv(lr wepns.
That's fine, but if they go into this bid, grimini will be just as financially bankrupt and economically uncompetitive.
nv(lr does not have an EROI, there is no solution for long term storage, and if you calculate 300,000-1,000,000 years of waste MANAGEMENT AND STORAGE, nv(lr only generates NEGATIVE amounts of electricity.
The GAS Pipeline, that's the 1 good thing, but if they WASTE that pipeline to suprrot a nv(lr backend, then they will NEVER EVER break ahead on Industrial product competitiveness.
This is the central problem of putting Economists/Lawyers/Morons in charge of THE MACHINE.
Merkle for better/worse, has a PHD in Quantum Chemistry.
SHE UNDERSTOOD, Engineering/ Energetic THROUGHPUT.
Nv(lr is a huge waste of resources.. Ending Nv(lr was the 1 thing merkl did right among EVERYTHING else she did wrong.
You should have Nv(lr weapns, Tp4 straight up supports that, but you should NOT build Nv(lr power plants outside of experimental rea(t0rs for physics purposes.
Nv(lr reactors do not generate electricity, they only CONSUME IT.
If the IDEA is to build "things" people want to actually buy, at "Competitive prices", wasting GAS on Nv(lr pwrplants is a death sentence for industrialization.
Nv(lrr wepns, YES
Nv(lr pwrplants, HARD PASS