Recent Posts

Pages:  [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10 »
1
Interest Checks / Re: [IC] GMK CYL Evil Lime
« Last post by Zahul on Tue, 12 May 2026, 14:57:09 »
This looks amazing! Any chance for an alpha kit with green legends?
2
Interest Checks / Re: [IC] | GMK CYL Selene | GB May 15th 2026!
« Last post by whysoda on Tue, 12 May 2026, 14:49:55 »
Hi everyone,

the GB page is now live with all of the latest information regarding pricing, fulfillment ETAs, and so on. Please head on over there instead of this IC page, thank you!!

https://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=126681.0
4
Interest Checks / Re: [IC] GMK CYL Evil Lime
« Last post by nadhole69 on Tue, 12 May 2026, 14:31:50 »
unexpected banger

I like this a lot
thank you foggy
5
Interest Checks / Re: [IC] GMK CYL Evil Lime
« Last post by mr_foggy on Tue, 12 May 2026, 14:14:11 »
unexpected banger

I like this a lot
6
Interest Checks / Re: [IC] Snowball44 - the gasket mount case for Keyball44
« Last post by HoffmanMyster on Tue, 12 May 2026, 13:57:35 »
Approval bump :thumb:
7
Interest Checks / Re: [IC] GMK CYL Evil Lime
« Last post by HoffmanMyster on Tue, 12 May 2026, 13:57:01 »
Approval bump :thumb:
8
Interest Checks / Re: [IC] GMK CYL Salamander : Unto the Anvils of War
« Last post by culain on Tue, 12 May 2026, 13:55:58 »
Love the concept.

GW actively claim Salamanders as a mark in recent filings.  I would expect the novelties, the language surrounding this set and the novelties to result in some form of response from them.

Suggest a) change the name, b) remove the novelties as pictured, they are pretty egregious, c) remove the language in the description which links clearly to GW IP.

The colour scheme on its own is probably fine, but as it stands this isn't going to stand up to challenge.

Those are some great points and I've been thinking about it lately as well but I feel like with how lowkey the hobby is we might be able to fly under the radar, I do agree with the novelties and im already working on fixing them a bit so they are  abit more vague!

Totally makes sense to me, and Id love to see this set made. Its such a lovely palette

I'd say that hoping to fly under the radar feels like the wrong move. In many cases the suppliers will wear the risk.  Id suggest either changing the title and novs to be sufficiently legally distinct, or come to some arrangement with GW.  Theyre nerds and hey, they might love the idea!

You might think about sub chapter novelties.

Core message: Id generally never aim to hope to dodge trademarks and copyright.
9
Interest Checks / Re: [IC] Ferat S1800 – an 1800 layout southpaw
« Last post by HoffmanMyster on Tue, 12 May 2026, 13:55:05 »
Approval bump :thumb:
10
Interest Checks / Re: [IC] GMK CYL Salamander : Unto the Anvils of War
« Last post by reidweb on Tue, 12 May 2026, 13:51:15 »
Love the concept.

GW actively claim Salamanders as a mark in recent filings.  I would expect the novelties, the language surrounding this set and the novelties to result in some form of response from them.

Suggest a) change the name, b) remove the novelties as pictured, they are pretty egregious, c) remove the language in the description which links clearly to GW IP.

The colour scheme on its own is probably fine, but as it stands this isn't going to stand up to challenge.

To add to this in the United Kingdom Games Workshop has a trademark application under examination covering Class 9 which includes "computer peripherals" and an active trademark for class 28 which largely covers toys and games; maybe go for something adjacent like Vulkan or Nocturne or something?
Pages:  [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10 »