3
« Last post by tp4tissue on Fri, 18 September 2026, 21:11:34 »
There is a critical misconception in warfare.
Warfare very narrowly defines who / what is any enemy / ally.
For example, a Lion goes to WAR with a gazelle.
In a specific moment in time, The gazelle is the enemy of the lion.
But outside of that time-frame, what if all the gazelles died, all the lions would then die.
So, this entire concept of us-vs-them is narrow, because it focuses on the moment.
It also calls into question, WHICH society is "the stronger life-form".
Why is it, that there are only a few lions, for thousands of gazelles.
BECAUSE, the gazelles can eat GRASS.
So, if the American Empire designs itself like the lion, Soldiers need MEAT, Airconditioning, Sex, Comfort women, Helmets, Aircraft Carrier, AI..
Welp, this is why we're getting our asses handed to us, BY Yemen.
They're the gazelle, they can eat grass, LOW TECH army, their soldiers literally wear flip flops, have AK47s with bent iron sight.
But, because their soldiers live on so much less, and accept the gazelle lifestyle, They can channel enormous energy into counter measures which has MADE the 'Mririkan Military OBSOLETE. Long range dronz, and balistix issles.
It doesn't matter how far we tech up, we can not win because we are fighting against nature.
Nature is the ultimate energy efficiency balancer, this is why we can't "Defeat" "The Forest".
To fight nature, is to Disrespect, the GOD-LINESS resident in ENERGY EFFICIENCY.
WAR, in the manner it is understood is obsolete. You can not put out forest fires with jetfuel-ed water bombers, in the same way, you can't win wars with gasoline.
Whenever we try to TECH our way to victory, "The enemy of the moment" will just eat grass, and beat you every single time.