I don't get this. Don't you have to bottom out with blacks? They are linear, there is no increasing resistance...
As Cherry MX's actuate about halfway through their travel, no, I don't see why anyone would
need to bottom out on
any Cherry switches. And if I understand typing physics, not bottoming out means you can type that much faster because you're not moving keys farther than you have to, or having to absorb the force of rebounding.
That said, it require quite a light, sensitive touch to avoid bottoming out on the lighter Cherrys. I doubt most people could do it. I sure can't, unless I slow way down, which defeats the purpose.
It may seem like a contradiction to claim that one could type faster and more comfortably on a
stiffer switch like Black. But I agree with the OP because, to me at least, Blacks represent the best tradeoff between actuation force and the amount of resistance that makes it
practical to type without bottoming out. Does that make sense?
What you describe reminds me of MX clears which are the best MX switch.
Ha ha! I haven't had the pleasure, but liking Blacks as much as I do, I can understand your fondness. Would you say they feel similar to buckling springs, which are also pretty stiff, but obviously have their advantages too?
Why do stock black MX switches feel gritty and gross? Explain that one keyboard Illuminati...
Mold lines on the sliders. Poorer quality control and too-fast production means scratchier switches than "vintage".
I've never experienced anything remotely like that on Blacks. To me, they just feel like Reds that need a bit more push (with the advantage I've mentioned above). Were you by any chance using knockoff black-types rather than Cherrys? Also, if I were unused to Blacks and found them icky, I could see how my brain might interpret the unfamiliarity/unpleasantness in ways like you describe, even if those particular physics weren't actually present... Our minds have various ways of saying "I don't like this!"
Also why does Ripster keep making puppet accounts just to necro old threads?
If you mean me, sorry, I just started reading/posting here a couple of weeks ago.
Speaking about blacks, I'm debating on whether or not I should get 60g springs for my vintage blacks.
That's what I love about this forum—you guys
really care about KBs!
Saying that any one switch is best is a quick way to stick your foot in your mouth. But sensational threads get more posts so I guess this one is working as intended. 
LOL! I don't know SpAmRaY too well, but I suspect he (she?) was just trying to get a rise out of us. To be fair, I'm sure we all have our ideas of what the "best" anything is; we just don't usually make a point of mentioning it (unless we want to start an argument—which can be entertaining, esp. if you live in the suburbs like I do, where there's not much else to do).
This is quite an old thread to have been resurrected.
I think you said something like that on the last older topic I replied to. Maybe I'm missing something—but dude,
what is the big deal about posting to a topic that has been inactive for a while?
I'm new to this forum, so all of these topics are new to me. I saw some interesting points being made about something that interested me. As I wasn't here earlier, I posted my thoughts here now, rather than starting a new thread and trying to recap everything that was already here, just so it'd say "2015". I just thought it'd be more efficient.
Cherry MX Blacks are still made, and we're still buying and using them, so this is indeed a "current" topic. But geez, we discuss KBs made 30+ years ago—so is even that very important?
1986, 2013, 2015—they're just numbers. It obviously doesn't bother the other people who've joined in again here. I think most of us are more interested in talking switches than complaining about who posted what when.