Sorry to inform you, but people have problems everywhere. Even in your country. Ignorance would make you think otherwise, as is obvious by your statement.
Of course they do. I'll justify my original statement, though.
I, along with much of the civilised world (which, by now, is seemingly more likely to include North Korea than the once "Land of the Free"), am looking on at the situation in the US with a mixture of incredulity and abject horror. Access to basic health care is predicated not on need, but on ability to pay - this is an utterly inhumane system, and it boggles the mind that anyone not currently profiting from that system is stupid enough to try and defend it - it's utterly indefensible. The reason that Obamacare is in a mess is not because it's unworkable (it's not, look at health care systems across, again, the civilised world), but because of vested interests trying to make it so. This largely comes down to the GOP "fighting the good fight" to keep the healthcare cartels in business. Not fighting "for your freedom", or even in the interests of fiscal policy, but fighting on a purely ideological basis that anything Obama says or does is wrong. Hell, the original ACA bill, before it got cut to ****ing ribbons by amendment after interest-loaded amendment, was a carbon copy of what the Republicans had themselves been calling for in 1993. And now the ****wits are holding the entire country to ransom. But this is somehow Obama's fault.
So yes, you Americans are mental. Those, like our trollworthy friend Mr Windows and Krogenar* who seem to consider Obamacare an abomination because - well, because that's a completely mental stance to take, and those who are on the other side because you haven't taken your plentiful supply of weapons and started forcefully ejecting the scum that are making your country a worse place for everyone.
It's worth considering that the gap between the rich and the poor in the US is arguably wider now than it was in pre-revolutionary France, and the situation is only getting worse. 1789 didn't work out too well for the rich, and their poor only had pitchforks.
* Who does at least appear to believe what he's saying - whether that puts him in the camp of "vested interests" or "morons" is a matter for debate.