1
Off Topic / Re: Why are search engines so bad?
« Last post by Leslieann on Mon, 29 May 2023, 20:03:03 »Thanks for this. I will probably use Searx (If I can get it to make it my main browser on firefox lol). I heard duckduckgo was good but I just don't want to give Microsoft my data. I would also rather get worse results than give a huge multi billion dollar corporation anything as well, even thought I would like to have the best of both worlds.You're welcome.
Do you think AI will be the next big leap when it comes to search engines, I'm not too invested in that aspect but I hope it does cause google is really bad. I'm just concerned that big companies like Microsoft will monopolized that aspect of search engine technology, which seems to be a potential future (and also the environmental damage that I've heard AI can bring). Hoping that if the technology is viable, there will be a free, private open source version of it.
I agree with you about MS, but it's not like they get a lot from an ad and if you use Windows, they already have your data.
AI will be the next big thing, we know that, but it's not working out even remotely how people expected.
We all thought A.I. would be more factual and it's turning to be more artistic and fuzzy than logical. Want it to calculate something precise or write a legal brief, fail. Want it to write a Seinfeld script or want a picture of your favorite actor riding a space shuttle into space it does amazing. We thought artists were safe, turns out they're the first being replaced by.
Everyone (including MS and Google) expected it to excel in search as it was a natural extension and while I think it will get there for the time being it's a money pit and it won't change any time soon. It's one thing for a search engine to make a mistake and send you to a scam site it's another when it gives you bad medical or legal advice or just straight up lies to you. Not only does it lie but it can even gaslight you. It's a lawsuit waiting to happen and that's why ChatGPT disabled a lot of functions recently. It's like a 5 year old telling you a story and manipulating you into doing it's bidding.
As for monopolizing it for search, it's a lot closer to personal assistants than a product in itself.
No one has been really able to monopolize or even monetize personal assistants, Alexa costs Amazon a TON while Siri and Ok Google helps drive phone sales none of these actually make money for them directly. While I (and MS) could see a world where MS wins out on A.I. search and ends up on every smart phone, I also can't. Everyone and their cousin is racing to catch up and throwing a LOOOOOOT of money at the problem. Also look at history, the first person/company to really make the great leap is usually pushed out pretty fast as they get leapfrogged and/or under estimate what their invention is capable of.
Also, A.I. is broad, no one A.I. is going to do everything, at least not at first.