Okay, so the story slowly unfolds. But I still can't quite wrap my mind around all this because some details are missing. Let's try to clarify.
I make sure that the original Pandas mold haven't been destroyed.
What exactly do you mean by saying "original molds"?
Are those the molds that are used to produce BSUN switch?
Or are those molds used to produce Inyr Panda switch?
Those two molds should be different molds because of the obvious reasons - BSUNs don't have Invyr logo on them.
zisb's Pandas R2 will use a new mold, not original mold. zisb asked his classmate to make a new mold. The new mold is low-priced and low-quality. The yield rate of his Panda R2 can only reach 70%, because of the mold.
Okay, so if I managed to decipher this correctly - what you want to say is this: after the first round of Invyr Panda switch, they had an idea to maximise profit by making cheaper low-quality mold for Panda R2. This is what caused ****ked up Panda switches with loose tops.
At some point, they realized their mistake and decided to make a new high quality mold, but it was kinda late because you already paid for the new mold from your own pocket.
So, essentially, this is a timerace who will get Panda R2 to the market first. Whoever does it, makes a lot of money.
If this is correct, then I was completely right with my first assumption in this thread, when I said there is a possibility Invyr simply didn't put enough money into this (which is perfectly justifiable from the bussiness perspective, just to be clear).
Correct a mistake, I never said I'm going to produce new leafs in Germany. I said the original leaf was made in Germany. Thanks.
Actually, what you said is this:
The leaf of New Pandas are made in Germany. Bsuns are made in China.
What I still don't understand is this:
- If Panda switches are basically BSUN switches, why did you have to pay for new molds? You could just use existing ones.
- If leaf if the only significant difference between BSUN and Invyr Panda, are you planing to reproduce them too?