But but.. this mouse isn't on that List of perfect sensors..
Or rather, is that list out of date.
The funny thing about lists like that and why i tend to ignore them for the most part is specs on paper versus real world performance and if the typical user notices are very different things. In a blind test of which mouse they were using i doubt most of these people could tell the difference one sensor to the next. Could a professional gamer at the highest levels of play? Perhaps. A normal typical user? I doubt it.
But if we do not make purchases based on Objective scientific theories, then the purchase would be for mere possession itself, which would make the ownership aimless..
Show Image
If specifications of anything are only noticeable on paper and not to the consumer in question than does it really make a difference?
If a tree falls in the forest and nobody is around to hear it does it really make a sound?
etc etc
Specs on paper mean nothing to me personally, how it actually performs does.
If on paper Sensor A is 10% more accurate but the mouse that uses it is uncomfortable and large
But Sensor B isn't quite as good but the perfect shaped/weighted mouse uses it and i can't tell a difference.
Personally i'm going to pick sensor B.
Honestly though iv'e compared the Razer Deathadder Chroma to even Red Dragon mice iv'e reviewed and in actual usage i can't tell a huge difference between the sensors personally. YMMV but i'd doubt the average user could either.
