Author Topic: What is your reaction time? (Read 3809 times)

Air tree · « **on:** Fri, 17 April 2015, 22:25:38 »

I'm averaging 250MS-270MS

http://www.humanbenchmark.com/tests/reactiontime

katushkin · « **Reply #1 on:** Fri, 17 April 2015, 22:28:12 »

About 300 =/

intelli78 · « **Reply #2 on:** Fri, 17 April 2015, 22:35:00 »

Also 300 here

ttzhou · « **Reply #3 on:** Fri, 17 April 2015, 22:35:00 »

Use peripheral vision and hold the mouse click down and just release when you see it. You get insane times that way.

Damn the mouse hold click trick doesn't work.

EDIT: 224 ms avg. Gonna try to get sub 200 later.

More

tp4tissue · « **Reply #4 on:** Fri, 17 April 2015, 22:45:28 »

I average 196ms

I think everyone can subtract at least 16ms for display lag (if you're on LCD)

Tip 1

Ok, some observations.. I got it down to 160 with some practice..

Essentially,, Don't look for GREEN.. wait for (flash).. As soon as you feel the screen is "brighter",

Click..

It's a much faster response..

My guess is.. If you're waiting for GREEN you'd still have to process the concept of GREEN, which is more complex than simply an increase in brightness..

Another Tip

Double click.. Do not single click..

If you single click, you need a second click to start the rhythm again..

If you double click, the timing and process is more streamline and simpler..

Air tree · « **Reply #5 on:** Fri, 17 April 2015, 23:03:48 »

Quote from: tp4tissue on Fri, 17 April 2015, 22:45:28

I average 196ms

I think everyone can subtract at least 16ms for display lag (if you're on LCD)

Tip 1

Ok, some observations.. I got it down to 160 with some practice..

Essentially,, Don't look for GREEN.. wait for (flash).. As soon as you feel the screen is "brighter",

Click..

It's a much faster response..

My guess is.. If you're waiting for GREEN you'd still have to process the concept of GREEN, which is more complex than simply an increase in brightness..

Another Tip

Double click.. Do not single click..

If you single click, you need a second click to start the rhythm again..

If you double click, the timing and process is more streamline and simpler..

I wish I had your reaction times.

tp4tissue · « **Reply #6 on:** Fri, 17 April 2015, 23:07:12 »

Nawh dawg.. Tp4 haz no stamina.. I can't play anything except hearthstone these days..

And I CAN"T PLAY Hearthstone because it's too damn addicting..

But overall I think you can easily get that time down if you play the game seriously LOLOL...

Air tree · « **Reply #7 on:** Fri, 17 April 2015, 23:36:21 »

Quote from: tp4tissue on Fri, 17 April 2015, 23:07:12

Nawh dawg.. Tp4 haz no stamina.. I can't play anything except hearthstone these days..

And I CAN"T PLAY Hearthstone because it's too damn addicting..

Show Image

But overall I think you can easily get that time down if you play the game seriously LOLOL...

From what I have read reaction time is mainly a genetic attribute, I could only increase about 10%-20%. Still not great.

But I'll live. :))

KnivesM · « **Reply #8 on:** Sat, 18 April 2015, 00:01:16 »

Average 176

azhdar · « **Reply #9 on:** Sat, 18 April 2015, 05:15:15 »

Average 356ms, no wonder I sux at FPS.

tp4tissue · « **Reply #10 on:** Sat, 18 April 2015, 05:29:07 »

Quote from: azhdar on Sat, 18 April 2015, 05:15:15

Average 356ms, no wonder I sux at FPS.

You guys gotta play seriously. hahahaha

also, you need to put PC into high performance mode to prevent frame drops/delay..

Every frame dropped or delayed is potentially 33ms EACH

animal · « **Reply #11 on:** Sat, 18 April 2015, 09:57:18 »

196 here. I guess all that FPSing finally payed out

steve.v · « **Reply #12 on:** Sat, 18 April 2015, 10:00:18 »

150 avg. I play Osu.

ApocalypseMaow · « **Reply #13 on:** Sat, 18 April 2015, 10:02:22 »

lol, I got 299 avg... but I'm 31... too old to care xD

sorijealut · « **Reply #14 on:** Sat, 18 April 2015, 10:53:26 »

I usually get around 230. As a CS:GO player it should be a little faster I think lol

One thing to note is that my mouse, FK1, makes me click slower

I really like what tp4 said up there. I will try what he said and report back.

edit: 210 now

Darn the Huano switches to heck, Omrons really are the best. I get 190 on my G400

shoostep · « **Reply #15 on:** Sat, 18 April 2015, 10:58:33 »

252, but i just woke up from only 4 hrs sleep.

Needing coffee!

Zeal · « **Reply #16 on:** Sat, 18 April 2015, 13:34:40 »

Air tree · « **Reply #17 on:** Sat, 18 April 2015, 13:37:16 »

Quote from: Zeal on Sat, 18 April 2015, 13:34:40

lul.
Show Image

I call hax

Zeal · « **Reply #18 on:** Sat, 18 April 2015, 13:41:13 »

I just got a 2ms and it called me out.

Sygaldry · « **Reply #19 on:** Sat, 18 April 2015, 13:43:13 »

I'm probably the worst CS:GO player here (Nova 4) but.... 195ms!!!

Air tree · « **Reply #20 on:** Sat, 18 April 2015, 13:53:30 »

Quote from: Sygaldry on Sat, 18 April 2015, 13:43:13

I'm probably the worst CS:GO player here (Nova 4) but.... 195ms!!!

Silver Elite Master.

Get rekt.

baldgye · « **Reply #21 on:** Sat, 18 April 2015, 14:27:46 »

280 using my phone, prob be faster with a mouse, but judging from my online racing experience I have pretty average reactions lol

sorijealut · « **Reply #22 on:** Sat, 18 April 2015, 15:01:34 »

Quote from: Zeal on Sat, 18 April 2015, 13:34:40

lul.
Show Image

Show Image

Zeal pls

rowdy · « **Reply #23 on:** Sat, 18 April 2015, 23:38:56 »

Mine seems to be around average.

Touch_It · « **Reply #24 on:** Sun, 19 April 2015, 00:08:05 »

296 avg the first 5 tries

jackalope · « **Reply #25 on:** Sun, 19 April 2015, 00:29:45 »

188 ms and that's with drinking vodka and peach tea and being up for almost 24 hours.

KHAANNN · « **Reply #26 on:** Sun, 19 April 2015, 17:03:35 »

I have an IPS monitor, so the delays are large, both display delay + connection delay, yet at ~260ms, probably I'm delayed a bit too

The test reminded me of the crypt of the necrodancer a lot, at the beginning there is a similar routine to compute the total delay, I ended up screwing the rhythm constantly, rage quited

Joey Quinn · « **Reply #27 on:** Sun, 19 April 2015, 17:49:29 »

My best was 208 but normally I'm around 250.

Nai_Calus · « **Reply #28 on:** Mon, 20 April 2015, 16:53:32 »

379 average. :/ I react slowly, apparently.

wlhlm · « **Reply #29 on:** Mon, 20 April 2015, 16:56:31 »

Quote from: Nai_Calus on Mon, 20 April 2015, 16:53:32

379 average. :/ I react slowly, apparently.

You sure you're not stoned?

exitfire401 · « **Reply #30 on:** Mon, 20 April 2015, 16:58:44 »

mainly around 240, but there were some outliers. This was my fastest of the group.

ttzhou · « **Reply #31 on:** Mon, 20 April 2015, 17:21:00 »

Got 171 ms on Linux, funnily enough. I guess it's superior even when it comes to testing reaction time

More

Joey Quinn · « **Reply #32 on:** Mon, 20 April 2015, 17:35:33 »

Totally intentional click... Not accidental at all.

Nai_Calus · « **Reply #33 on:** Tue, 21 April 2015, 05:44:52 »

Quote from: wlhlm on Mon, 20 April 2015, 16:56:31

Quote from: Nai_Calus on Mon, 20 April 2015, 16:53:32
379 average. :/ I react slowly, apparently.
You sure you're not stoned?

Yes. I consider smoking anything to be stupid because I sing so I don't do it. XD Don't care what kind of smoke, it ain't going near my lungs and throat.

I have very poor vision and eye-hand coordination and my one good eye is currently recovering from getting something in it that I suspect scratched it. But regardless of current injuries, my reaction times just are not quick. I love video games, been playing them since I was a kid, I am still terrible at them.

wlhlm · « **Reply #34 on:** Tue, 21 April 2015, 06:12:43 »

Hope you'll recover quickly!

GenKaan · « **Reply #35 on:** Tue, 21 April 2015, 08:19:00 »

Cant seem to go lower than 189ms :/

CPTBadAss · « **Reply #36 on:** Tue, 21 April 2015, 08:21:40 »

Fast enough to get into a Clack Sale posted in his subforum but not quite fast enough to send out an email at exactly 1920 for a Bro Cap sale.

drewba · « **Reply #37 on:** Tue, 21 April 2015, 12:07:39 »

270MS over 20 tries

Skechup · « **Reply #38 on:** Tue, 21 April 2015, 13:24:00 »

Averaging around 300-310

Frenir · « **Reply #39 on:** Tue, 21 April 2015, 13:29:43 »

250, I don't know if it's good or not though :I

jdcarpe · « **Reply #40 on:** Tue, 21 April 2015, 14:10:15 »

240ms average

plegnic · « **Reply #41 on:** Tue, 21 April 2015, 14:25:41 »

Did it 5 times and averaged ~270ms. Moved to a different monitor and it went down to ~245ms.

The other monitor is bigger and has much higher brightness so I think that might help some.

Frenir · « **Reply #42 on:** Tue, 21 April 2015, 16:00:20 »

Tried again and got an average of 210 this time.

wupi · « **Reply #43 on:** Tue, 21 April 2015, 16:31:58 »

Mhmm.

lolkey · « **Reply #44 on:** Tue, 21 April 2015, 21:20:25 »

I did this a while ago and your mouse switches can effect the speed. If I remember correctly, my Zowie FK1 with Huano switches was around 240'ish and my Logitech G700 with Omron switches was around 210'ish, some going as low as 180'ish. I believe this is why some people actually solder in the Omron switches into certain mice.

Sygaldry · « **Reply #45 on:** Wed, 22 April 2015, 18:45:51 »

http://aim400kg.ru/

Time to work out my FPS skills! There's a reaction time mini game too!

Best reaction time yet: 47ms (avg 190)

paicrai · « **Reply #46 on:** Wed, 22 April 2015, 19:51:05 »

Quote from: Sygaldry on Wed, 22 April 2015, 18:45:51

Best reaction time yet: 47ms

calm the **** down batman

Glod · « **Reply #47 on:** Fri, 24 April 2015, 16:49:12 »

News:

Author Topic: What is your reaction time? (Read 3809 times)