I'm sorry if this question is noobish but I did search the forums and it still wasn't very clear to me:
This thread by Jacobolus and other posts of his and others
here,
here and
here seem to indicate that negative tilt, where the part of the keyboard closer to the user is higher than the one far away is beneficial. For instance this keycap profile diagram:
But I am not able to understand how negative tilt is beneficial. I am inclined to think that if "higher" row keys are actually physically higher then it will be easier for fingers stretching forward to hit them, no? If I'm wrong please point out the flaw in my reasoning...
The tilt/tent kit provided by [url=https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/ergodox-ez-an-incredible-mechanical-keyboard]the ErgoDox EZ[/url]:
[img]https://images.indiegogo.com/file_attachments/1409329/files/20150423101014-tilt-tent-1.jpg">>
is shown to provide for positive tilt but probably that can be turned the other way around too, so that's not an indication either way.
But sculpted keyboards like
Katy,
Dactyl Cave and
rsheldiii's cave seem to increase the height as we go to the "higher" rows i.e. digit/F rows. The Kinesis which is the inspiration for the above individual efforts, does seem to go down though, but it doesn't have a proper F row and I'm not sure how that would factor into the equation.
Finally, the point of DCS and other profiles seem to make it convenient for "higher" row keys to be hit by the fingers stretching upwards so it does seem that positive tilt is good as per my reasoning above?!
Totally confused here...