Lol @ sth and demik.
You guys don't even know what tyranny is man. You've already accepted your shackles. "Thank you massah!"
Trying to explain freedom to a statist is like trying to explain the sky to a fish. That doesn't mean I'm wrong...it just means I have a completely different view of reality than you do. I can prove with facts that it's most correct, but statists never like to hear the truth - because it disproves everything they believe in.
i don't know what gave you the idea that i am a statist / not anarchistic, man
shackles paints a really nice picture of a suffering that i am wary to assume that you are in a position to understand unless i've grossly misjudged you. also you don't need to resort to that kind of really-treading-on-racist hyperbole.
from what i've seen of your political/economic ideals, you always struck me as an individualist/libertarian rather than an anarchist. yes, individualist anarchism exists but it's certainly not what we're talking about here, at least yet.
case in point - your hatred of taxes is predicated on your hatred of the state. but taxes are perfectly compatible with many of anarchism so long as the taxes are agreed upon. furthermore, claiming that taxation is theft or outright coercive places undue importance on the value of currency, which, as an anarchist, should be a means to an end i would imagine, and less so a goal for accumulation.
i am in no way saying that taxation as it exists is a fully good thing, but you are quick to dismiss what has worked in the past and can work again even without a hierarchy or state that 'dictates' taxation. without a full-on gift economy, can you suggest another form of social welfare that is non-coercive and prevents suffering? as someone who prefers a wasteful safety net to no safety net, it's one of my favorite quandaries of anarchist thought. and no, saying that people who can't/won't/don't work should be left to fend for themselves is not an acceptable answer, since we're talking anarchism on a societal level.
as far as anarchist idealism (something i have ruefully put back on the shelf, but still hold dear) ponder this quote:
"It is not for anarchists to celebrate when ‘the people’ take over, anarchists ought not to be so amazed at examples of natural ingenuity and resilience, that is after all what they base all their principles on. Unfortunately their proper political task is less appealing and more controversial, it is to poke their fingers into the wounds of revolution, to doubt and to look for ways in which the Zapatistas, FLN, ANC or any other bunch of leftwing heroes will sell out, because they always do."
http://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/monsieur-dupont-nihilist-communism