What's with all These Weird and Small Keyboard Layouts Lately?

[mattlach]

I'd been absent from these boards for several years and just logged back on, and boy, I barely recognize myself?

Whats up with all these TKL and 60% boards and other weirdo layouts?   How come people even like them?

For me it's all standard modern 104-key layout or I pass.



I don't even understand how anyone uses a keyboard without arrow keys and a numpad.   I use that **** every day, and would be horribly slowed down without a proper numpad for typing numbers.

So what is the draw of these things?  Why do people like them?

[portbaron]

The push has been to get more compact/symmetrical the last several years. They've even got boards smaller than 60% now (who needs a number row?). I'm waiting for the eventual 1 key keyboard to appear as the ultimate culmination for keyboard design.

I agree with you though. I use numpad, arrow keys, and even F row a lot. I've settled on full 1800s because you don't lose any keys but pull the mouse a few inches closer to your center. I'll pull out 75/65/60% boards for fun, and they have a clean look that is nice, but never when I actually have work to get done.

[Kavik]

It depends what you're doing. At work, I do find it hard to use anything smaller than full size or 1800 layout because I do like the numpad. And, no, a separate numpad is not the same; it defeats the purpose of muscle memory, and it can slide around.

Aesthetically, I like TKL the most, and I think it's still usable enough for most applications while saving some space.

I only have one keyboard smaller than this, a 65%, which still has arrow keys and most of the nav keys. I like using it when playing video games because it gives me a lot more room for my mouse. I don't understand how anyone can play games with a 104 key anymore; even if the desk is big enough, the distance between hands just feels awkward and uncomfortable. That said, 65% is fairly annoying to use at work.

I am intrigued by a lot of the odd and smallish layouts, but mostly for aesthetics.

[ghjim]

I'm on my second month into MKs, tried TKL and felt like part of me was missing so from that point on, 104 or no go.

[clappingcactus]

I'd been absent from these boards for several years and just logged back on, and boy, I barely recognize myself?

Whats up with all these TKL and 60% boards and other weirdo layouts?   How come people even like them?

I've been into mechs since the mid-2000s and even then the HHKB and Deck Francium 87 were highlights of the hobbyist community.

How long ago is 'several years' because I think the last time smaller keyboards weren't popular it was the 80s. )

[Lanrefni]

I tried the Levinson which is a small split ortho board for a while and I just couldn't adapt to using layers for numbers and function keys,so I stepped up to it's much bigger brother which has all the keys-



Soldering 108 diodes and switches was tedious,but worth it. 

[mattlach]

I tried the Levinson which is a small split ortho board for a while and I just couldn't adapt to using layers for numbers and function keys,so I stepped up to it's much bigger brother which has all the keys-

Show Image

Soldering 108 diodes and switches was tedious,but worth it.  :D

That looks interesting, but the key spacing seems off.   A is directly beneath Q, when it usually is slightly offset to the right.

I don't know if I could get used to that.

[mattlach]

I'd been absent from these boards for several years and just logged back on, and boy, I barely recognize myself?

Whats up with all these TKL and 60% boards and other weirdo layouts?   How come people even like them?

I've been into mechs since the mid-2000s and even then the HHKB and Deck Francium 87 were highlights of the hobbyist community.

How long ago is 'several years' because I think the last time smaller keyboards weren't popular it was the 80s. )

Well, maybe I don't recall the small form factor keyboards from back then.  Iv'e been using Model M's since they were new, but I strayed away fro several years during the 90's, only getting back to it the early ought when I found a Lexmark Model M for $9 on eBay.  I forget when I was here last.  It's been a while, but not THAT long...

[stoic-lemon]

That you need all those keys is fine. But you have no idea how people can be ok with accessing the arrow keys or F row from a function layer? People have different requirements and preferences for all kinds of things.

[mattlach]

It depends what you're doing. At work, I do find it hard to use anything smaller than full size or 1800 layout because I do like the numpad. And, no, a separate numpad is not the same; it defeats the purpose of muscle memory, and it can slide around.

Aesthetically, I like TKL the most, and I think it's still usable enough for most applications while saving some space.

I only have one keyboard smaller than this, a 65%, which still has arrow keys and most of the nav keys. I like using it when playing video games because it gives me a lot more room for my mouse. I don't understand how anyone can play games with a 104 key anymore; even if the desk is big enough, the distance between hands just feels awkward and uncomfortable. That said, 65% is fairly annoying to use at work.

I am intrigued by a lot of the odd and smallish layouts, but mostly for aesthetics.

I don't play games as much as I used to, but when I do, I use a modified version of the early Quake controls.

There is no "WASD" for me.   I use the arrow keys (though left and right strafes, not turns like in those early games)

I then remap all of the important keys around the arrow keys.  Delete (on the insert, Home, Page Up, Delete, End Page Down grouping) typically reloads.   OPage Down is zoom/iron sights.

This way I can push my keyboard to the left, and still have my right hand with the mouse pretty close.

(I also invert mouse, and use mouse2 as my jump button.  I know this seems  crazy now, but it was the norm back in the day)

[mattlach]

That you need all those keys is fine. But you have no idea how people can be ok with accessing the arrow keys or F row from a function layer? People have different requirements and preferences for all kinds of things.

Different needs are all good and well, but retraining muscle memory from the standard keyboard layout since -  what, (1983?) - is what is the biggest problem for me.

I do use my many more keys regularly, but the "breaking the muscle memory" issue is the biggest problem, I think.

[Zeimus]

Well I could get a numpad to use with a tkl or smaller layout keyboard.  Its the same but its not permanently attached, right?

[noisyturtle]

i don't get it either, 40% and smaller just feels like something out of a crakerjack box

[SBJ]

TKL or bust!
I honestly can't go back to any of the smaller layouts I don't think.
I have 1 pc in the house where space is limited and I am considering purchasing a HHKB for that.
But if I have the space, TKL it is!

[frydaja]

Whats up with all these TKL and 60% boards and other weirdo layouts?   How come people even like them?

I use a numpad, navpad and function keys quite a lot. 60% would be okay if I'd type a lot, but I use the keyboard to navigate through Explorer and sometimes even the web browser. And I use the numpad because of the calculator.

Having to press a key I use quite a lot.. I'd not bother that much if I could press the key with one hand.

A fullsize keyboard that's way too big is a bigger issue when doing usual computing (internet etc) and typing, and not gaming. I know about the "all the free space" argument, but you can earn some free space by moving the keyboard to the side. When doing usual computing, typing on an angle is weird and probably unhealthy and having keyboard centered feels bad when using the mouse.

That said, I'd still not go for navpad over a function key. I think XT layout is the best, because navpad is kind of redundant, because it's in the navpad even on today's keyboards and the function key is already there and it's toggleable.


40%.. I feel like it's for those one percent of people who never use numbers and type everything using words. Leaving off the number row for such a tiny decrease in size is.. questionable.

[killyou]

I don't ever use numpad, I very rarely use F keys and other crap. I find 60% layout superior because I don't have to move my hands and everything that I don't use regularly is easily available through Fn layer. I don't use Caps Lock at all so I have secondary Function key there so it makes it very easy to use arrow cluster hidden in Fn layer. I don't want to type any other way than with my 60% keyboard.

[funderburker]

Mmm, to each his own.

I'm not against full-sized boards or TKLs (visually I actually love TKLs) but I got into mechs because of 40% keyboard - it was cheaper to make my own then to order a TKL or purchase a overpriced gamer-themed mechanical board locally.

For my personal use 60% does the job just fine as I've never actually really used a numpad for stuff like data entry anyways. F rows are something I need to use time to time so for the times I need them I'm fine with them being in Fn layer. Most days I use TMO50 just cause I can shove it in my backpack easily. And I'm pretty sure I will never have a full-sized board, TKL is the biggest I'd go.

[Findecanor]

Some people never learned to use the numpad — and for those people the numpad is superfluous. It's as simple as that.

The 40% keyboards (and thereabouts) is something I don't really understand how people can be content with though.
Everything but English alphas on other layers ...

[funderburker]

Some people never learned to use the numpad — and for those people the numpad is superfluous. It's as simple as that.

The 40% keyboards (and thereabouts) is something I don't really understand how people can be content with though.
Everything but English alphas on other layers ...

Well, latvian letters like ēūīāšģķļčņ are all written by pressing ' before it, that's how Microsoft implemented our alphabet. I can use AltGr of course but it's not that comfortable and haven't met anyone who used that keymapping. But I agree that a lot of languages could be uncomfortable with something smaller than 60%.

For the record I'm not against bigger boards but just embrace sub60% layouts if people are ready to get used to them. It depends solely on ones preference. I can't imagine people doing data entry or finances for example on a small board but for programming it's not that bad if you have sane keymapping. Also anything less than TKL is pretty much useless for people that have to share a keyboard - my wife probably will never understand how to use a 60%.

[kgolden]

I prefer 60s. Everything I do can easily be done with that size keyboard. I personally dont mind using layers to access other functions.

[mattlach]

That said, I'd still not go for navpad over a function key. I think XT layout is the best, because navpad is kind of redundant, because it's in the navpad even on today's keyboards and the function key is already there and it's toggleable.

I would be able to get by without a numpad, but I wouldn't like it.  I could always use the top row numvers.   I wouldnt like it.  It would be much slower to deal with numbers, but I COULD do it.

I don't understand - however -  how anyone can type without the arrow keys and the home, end, delete pgup and pgdn above them.

How else do you navigate around your text when typing?    Constabtly grasping your mouse?  That seems very inefficient, slow and awkward.

I couldn't imagine typing anything at all without them.

[funderburker]

That said, I'd still not go for navpad over a function key. I think XT layout is the best, because navpad is kind of redundant, because it's in the navpad even on today's keyboards and the function key is already there and it's toggleable.

I would be able to get by without a numpad, but I wouldn't like it.  I could always use the top row numvers.   I wouldnt like it.  It would be much slower to deal with numbers, but I COULD do it.

I don't understand - however -  how anyone can type without the arrow keys and the home, end, delete pgup and pgdn above them.

How else do you navigate around your text when typing?    Constabtöy grasping your mouse?  That seems very inefficient, slow and awkward.

I couldn't imagine typing anything at all without them.

Have you tried putting arrows and nav cluster in Fn layer near homerow? Ever since I tried HHKB arrows, I use them on every board I have. Sorry but how long have you been out of this hobby and have you read something about smaller boards? Of course no one could use a board without any arrows, that'd be pointless.

[kurplop]

I find the variety interesting. I have found 60 to 70 keys a good balance between functionality and minimal movement, but would never say that it’s right for everyone. I think it has a lot to do with how the keyboard is used.
The fact that many people who get used to the smaller boards never go back to full boards suggests that it is more than a passing fad.

[mattlach]

Show Image

Have you tried putting arrows and nav cluster in Fn layer near homerow? Ever since I tried HHKB arrows, I use them on every board I have. Sorry but how long have you been out of this hobby and have you read something about smaller boards? Of course no one could use a board without any arrows, that'd be pointless.

I guess that could work once you get used to it, but I think I would find myself being awkward and discombobulated if I tried it.

The only boards I've ever used with Fn layers were certain compact laptops, and I always hated the experience.

Keyboards aren't necessarily a hobby for me.  Computers are.   I just appreciate having a quality input device when I use them.

I research them once every five years or so when its time to buy a new one.   I didn't even realize that people built their own boards until right now.

[zslane]

Non-standard layouts (especially on sub-TKL boards) are popular with people who really like making their custom keycap purchases as expensive and inconvenient as possible.

[frydaja]

Have you tried putting arrows and nav cluster in Fn layer near homerow? Ever since I tried HHKB arrows, I use them on every board I have. Sorry but how long have you been out of this hobby and have you read something about smaller boards? Of course no one could use a board without any arrows, that'd be pointless.

I don't touchtype, but my hand is close to that position. That said, my problem is that the physical key is mising. I use nav keys all the time, and having to reach for an additional key while looking for Home or even arrows would slow me down. With XT layout, I can leave the NumLock off most of the time and toggle NumLock when I need to type numbers.

Also, the FN key feels too far from the navkeys. I'd prefer a keyboard that'd have something useful instead of a right Shift, but no one sells that, right?

[Lanrefni]

Non-standard layouts (especially on sub-TKL boards) are popular with people who really like making their custom keycap purchases as expensive and inconvenient as possible.

You aren't kidding,finding a keycap set with 1u mods is a pain in the butt,finding 1u mods with profiles that match my layout in anything other than DSA/XDA/G20 is pretty much impossible. 

[CChocobo]

Former full size and TKL user, recent Iris convert here.

Initially I hated not having the extra keys, but as I've spent more time with this board it has become a large part of what I like about it. By forcing me to dive into QMK and rebind things so I have stuff like } and [, it has allowed me to really hone in on an efficient layout unique to me.

That's now the draw for me, I have an even more sensible custom layout for my use that allows minimal hand travel with no compromise in function. Most things are even easier than a full size by virtue of re-positioning and double function tap dance. It also forced me to learn how to touch type correctly, which was an added benefit.

[scoopbb]

started with ergodox but realized i didnt use all the keys on the board. iris is the lowest i can go personally. in general preonic is the perfect size for me. nyquist with a nice case or an atreus62 would prolly be ideal.

i like 60% boards too. personally i dont use the numpad at all, and i can layer arrows or bind them to bottom right keys that i never use.

tkl are fine, i just prefer smaller keyboards at home, dont have a ton of desk space. qmk makes everything simple, just takes a few days for your brain to convert over...at least for me.

[chyros]

I've been asking this for years xD . I don't get it either!

[no, the other guy]

For me it's all standard modern 104-key layout or I pass.

You should try a 122-key layout.

Also, I totally plusone your question. I mean, people who buy an actual keyboard never do that because of a lack of space. I never saw a picture of a barely fitting 60%-or-less keyboard, they all have more than enough free room on all sides. Do people want to travel with their keyboard all day? Everything else makes no sense. And they even make it worse to look at with that OLKB hype. Seriously, other people pay women to whip them. Just saying.

[Leslieann]

I'm with OP.
I use a TKL, and I have a separate numpad for those rare times I am doing tons of numbers work, but usually a TKL is fine. I could stand to shave a few select keys (working on that!) but for the most part I use almost everything on the board and can't imagine trying to add function layers, especially for things like the arrow keys, I use them entirely too much.

I get the idea of small (leaves more room for the mouse and clutter), but you reach a point where it can become impractical. I experienced it a bit of it with the Magicforce 68 because it was missing the Fkeys but I only had to start looking at remapping firmware to realize my GH60 was not going to work at all. There's entirely too many keyboard shortcuts needed for the programs I use that trying to get everything mapped would become a bit silly.

[chyros]

Apart from my normal keyboard, I use a macropad and even bought another separate numpad as well. Although some small form factors are worse than others, I don't think any of them are a genuine substitute for a fullsize.

I should add that I don't like windows keys.

[Gati]

Unless you work with the nav cluster or numpad, those keys are useless (excl. the arrow keys)

[Entropia]

What I find really unneccesary is the nav cluster. It makes keyboards wider without a reason because it's much easier to use the numpad to browse a text or a webpage. It feels natural for me to use the numpad cursors together with the keys on the corners to move along and between lines. I also like the enter key on the numpad because I sometimes just move my hand from the mouse and use my thumb to click that enter key. For gaming it's also a great solution, as somebody above already suggested. I hate the missaligned wasd and the absurd standard that has been created around it. Also, if you need to input numbers, just press the numlock and the keys behave differently. Function keys are also important for me. I don't think I could ever get used to pressing a Fn combination for basic and daily tasks such as update or rename. Other function keys are quite useless for me and that's why I use scripts to give them interesting tasks such as closing folder windows, extracting usb devices, etc. I really don't understand why to remove this row of keys from a board since they do not make boards wider (ergonomic problem for some) and they are in a place that is not obstructive for typing or whatever. That said, I'm now using a 1800 layout (Leopold), which is really good since you have all you need from a 100% board but it's almost the width of a tenkeyless (and you get rid of the redundant nav cluster).

[mattlach]

What I find really unneccesary is the nav cluster. It makes keyboards wider without a reason because it's much easier to use the numpad to browse a text or a webpage. It feels natural for me to use the numpad cursors together with the keys on the corners to move along and between lines. I also like the enter key on the numpad because I sometimes just move my hand from the mouse and use my thumb to click that enter key. For gaming it's also a great solution, as somebody above already suggested. I hate the missaligned wasd and the absurd standard that has been created around it. Also, if you need to input numbers, just press the numlock and the keys behave differently. Function keys are also important for me. I don't think I could ever get used to pressing a Fn combination for basic and daily tasks such as update or rename. Other function keys are quite useless for me and that's why I use scripts to give them interesting tasks such as closing folder windows, extracting usb devices, etc. I really don't understand why to remove this row of keys from a board since they do not make boards wider (ergonomic problem for some) and they are in a place that is not obstructive for typing or whatever. That said, I'm now using a 1800 layout (Leopold), which is really good since you have all you need from a 100% board but it's almost the width of a tenkeyless (and you get rid of the redundant nav cluster).

I had not heard of the Leopold 1800 layout.   It looks interesting.

It's not for me, as I want to be able to use both my numerical keypad and Ins,Home,PgUp,Del,End,PgDn without constantly having to hit num-lock, but I can see how some would like it.

I find Fn, Num Lock, Scroll Lock type modifiers to be a nuisance.   I'd rather never have to use one, except for switching between upper and lower case letters.

[no, the other guy]

That's only one of the many advantages of the XT layout: no double nav cluster.

[zslane]

The nav cluster is too ingrained into my muscle memory. For me, having navigation functions on the numpad is pointless.

And while I may not use all the Fn keys, or use the numpad constantly, I still like full-size keyboards for their capacity to display more of a beautiful keycap set than TKL or smaller boards. That alone makes them worth having on my desk.

[chyros]

That's only one of the many advantages of the XT layout: no double nav cluster.

IMO; XT > TKL

[ThoughtArtist]

That's only one of the many advantages of the XT layout: no double nav cluster.

IMO; XT > TKL

Some of us who use a mouse would rather have ergonomics and a separate numpad if needed

[seville57]

I'd been absent from these boards for several years and just logged back on, and boy, I barely recognize myself?

Whats up with all these TKL and 60% boards and other weirdo layouts?   How come people even like them?

For me it's all standard modern 104-key layout or I pass.

Show Image

I don't even understand how anyone uses a keyboard without arrow keys and a numpad.   I use that **** every day, and would be horribly slowed down without a proper numpad for typing numbers.

So what is the draw of these things?  Why do people like them?

I don't like them at all, I own 1 TKL (Ducky Shine 3 ISO/Nordic, the "Butterboard") but I never use it. Playin games so I'm usin 108 keys.

[tp4tissue]

The Cause...    YOUNG people..


It takes TIME, to realize, as cute as it looks, it's not practical..

It takes yet MORE TIME, to realize keyboards are h8-ful things that are iconic of modern IT-Slavery.


Once a person gets Old enough and Wise enough in front of their keyboards, Bam.... Stockholm syndrome,   And here we are.. Gekhak.

[SBJ]

The Cause...    YOUNG people..


It takes TIME, to realize, as cute as it looks, it's not practical..

It takes yet MORE TIME, to realize keyboards are h8-ful things that are iconic of modern IT-Slavery.


Once a person gets Old enough and Wise enough in front of their keyboards, Bam.... Stockholm syndrome,   And here we are.. Gekhak.

You crack me up somtimes TP.  )

[daerid]

I generally don't enjoy full size keyboards since it forces the keyboard to be so far to the right it gets in the way of my mousepad. My last job was working on Windows / .NET, so arrow keys were a must. Nowadays I'm strictly in the Mac/*nix world so I can get by with only a 60%, although I still prefer the TKL layout as a good compromise being utility and compactness.

[sinusoid]

I'm waiting for the eventual 1 key keyboard to appear as the ultimate culmination for keyboard design.

Isn't that where we came from?


From my point of view, keyboard firmware that allows layers and custom functions is much more efficient than having more physical switches to press. 
You can have a numpad, you can have the F keys, you can have software-specific shortcuts, half-keyboard typing, and all that without ever leaving the home row.

I don't usually see this implemented in small layout keyboards, but... yeah, my point is that reduced size doesn't necessarily impede functionality.

[...] so far to the right it gets in the way of my mousepad.

This is probably the best political statement of 2019 so far

[mattlach]

I generally don't enjoy full size keyboards since it forces the keyboard to be so far to the right it gets in the way of my mousepad.

Uhh...   Just push it a little to the left?

I don't understand the issue here.

[ander]

I generally don't enjoy full size keyboards since it forces the keyboard to be so far to the right it gets in the way of my mousepad.

Uhh...   Just push it a little to the left? ... I don't understand the issue here.

Really! I never got that particular bit of fussiness either.

Okay, TKLs make sense if if you never use the number pad. I miss it right away, as I can no longer use Alt+#### codes to enter special characters like dashes, bullets, or accented letters (as IBM, in their wisdom, decided not to make them work with the regular number keys). But I realize that's not important to everyone. (Ha, I just used a dash, Alt+0151.) Some TKLs have embedded numpads that are activated when you press NumLock, so those are okay, but not all do.

Otherwise, changing your whole layout just so your mouse can be a bit closer? Even to the point of requiring you to hold modifiers to do things like moving your cursor, or jumping from one place in a line or document to another? My grandma would've called that "penny-wise and pound-foolish".

I realize there's a certain charm to using a keeb so small you can practically slip it into your shirt pocket. But yeesh, at the cost of making typing so laborious? Go figure.

Maybe it's just a fad. People see people with keebs like those, and they think that if they use them too, they'll be cool. But real coolness is independence from what others think and do, not copying them—so I've never gotten that, either.  :?O

[zizard]

fad

complicate ur life just to have a cute keeb, and typically people post their tiny keebs on giant desk mats with ridic free space all around

[appaboy]

That's only one of the many advantages of the XT layout: no double nav cluster.

IMO; XT > TKL

That's a first... I love numpad myself but I wouldn't go that far

[4sStylZ]

I love a keyboard when I do not have to make long move to reach the keys, that’s why I love compact boards.
I love to use all my hand and use my palm on modificator like Fn, Super or Ctrl.
I want to use all my fingers with a symetric frequency so that’s why I use a Dvorak based layout (Bépo). It’s also not normal for me to have the pinky who need to move and twist for reaching Enter or del, that why I love to have enter and del / backspace on the middle of the board.
I love to have an integrated numpad directly on the right hand, but I hate to have to reach it by moving the hand. So I can accept to use modificator for getting access to the numpad.

So we can play a game.
Can you tell me what keyboard I have ? An ergo one for sure…

Typematrix 2030

[no, the other guy]

Heh, Tapatalk ruins your spoiler.

[Kaorix]

Im a big fan personally of 97 key boards.

[Lazylewis]

I’m a programmer who types 9-10 hours a day everyday. I find hhkb and 10keyless the best for speed and ergonomics.

[BundleOfJoysticks]

What I find really unneccesary is the nav cluster. It makes keyboards wider without a reason because it's much easier to use the numpad to browse a text or a webpage.

Funny how people with similar needs can make basically opposite choices.

I like a numpad but can live without it. But dedicated nav keys are a must. I don't even like having home/end/pgup/pdgn on a layer + arrow keys. It's funny because I did most of my formative typing on an XT keyboard with no nav and arrows on the numpad, and it was fine.

[abrahamstechnology]

I built a linear black Alps 60% so I don't have to use the god-awful Dell chiclet keyboards in my university's library.

[navy2x]

My first two boards were TKL, but lately I’ve been wanting a full 100% board. I just ordered a leopold R2SA from Korea. Can’t wait to get it!

[ander]

I'd been absent from these boards for several years and just logged back on, and boy, I barely recognize myself? ... Whats up with all these TKL and 60% boards and other weirdo layouts?   How come people even like them?

Those teeny-tiny keebs not only have no number pad, but there aren't even any navigation keys (arrows, Home/End, PgUp/Dn) or function keys... There isn't even a Delete key.





So to do what we normally do with those keys—even something as simple as moving your cursor—you have to use multi-key combinations, and typing becomes a process of anti-ergonomic hoop-jumping. To onlookers, it looks like you're playing a Chopin etude on a tiny piano.

Why would anyone go to so much extra trouble? As far as I can tell, it's because it makes the rest of one's life seem incredibly easy by comparison. Also, teeny keyboards are c-u-t-e, especially if they're also in tropical colours and make little happy noises like anime characters and so on. I think I'm somewhere in the ballpark on all this, at least.

[jonowarren94]

I can fit more of them on my desk...

[Sintpinty]

Most of the time, when doing basic tasks, the numpad is not needed for some people, so they switch to a smaller size. Some may like it due to the amount of space it saves on the desk, and how nice the feel is. I personally prefer a 60% as it does not require all the keys that i need and i can simply put a wrist rest if i'm having any pain. 
Most 100% keyboards i believe are unneccesary due to data entry.

[appaboy]

Tkl with left hand seperate numpad is as low as I can go without being uncomfortable, I do use a 75 percent a lot but something about tkl and left hand 3700 is so comfy

[incrocio]

Personally, I like small keyboards. Not because of aesthetics or space-saving, just because I don't have to move my hands as much. Move everything as close to home row as possible.

Granted, that's achievable with larger keyboards as well as long as they're programmable.

[Lucien Midnight]

Having tried everything down to 40% at the smallest (standard and ortho layouts), I can say that XD75 or preonic layouts are my fav so far. It took some getting used to, but I just map arrow keys to a layer under I,J,L and no need to move my right hand anywhere. I still have the number keys and quick shift access to the symbols that I use very often.


If I wan't using ortho, i'd probably opt for TKL tho.

[Peripheral Prophet]

Im a big fan personally of 97 key boards.

This^^^

[hieuuk]

Before I wouldn't think I'm able to use any less then TKL too, until I try and love it. The strong benefit of it is that you don't actually need to move your hand too much when you writing (for me is coding). I set the caplock to FN, then I'm mainly using WASD as nav buttons. E R = Home End, FN + BackSpace or FN + ESC = Delete. I also have a set of Nav bar at the bottom right of the keyboard for when I only need moving around while not fully typing mode. Check my screenshot for my set up.

I have an Leopold 980c in 1800 layout too which I think it is really good as it has full key and small size, but as I can't programming it to WASD and FN functions. I might build my next keyboard 1800 layout with full programable keyboard. Do anyone know a way to programming on the Leopold 980c by any chance please?

[Entropia]

Before I wouldn't think I'm able to use any less then TKL too, until I try and love it. The strong benefit of it is that you don't actually need to move your hand too much when you writing (for me is coding). I set the caplock to FN, then I'm mainly using WASD as nav buttons. E R = Home End, FN + BackSpace or FN + ESC = Delete. I also have a set of Nav bar at the bottom right of the keyboard for when I only need moving around while not fully typing mode. Check my screenshot for my set up.

I have an Leopold 980c in 1800 layout too which I think it is really good as it has full key and small size, but as I can't programming it to WASD and FN functions. I might build my next keyboard 1800 layout with full programable keyboard. Do anyone know a way to programming on the Leopold 980c by any chance please?

I think I read somewhere something about a controller mod which involves replacing some of the electronics of the FC980C to make it programmable. Anyway, I'm not really interested in that, since I use AutoHotkey to do whatever I want with my keyboard.

[_GMK_]

I love a keyboard when I do not have to make long move to reach the keys, that’s why I love compact boards.
I love to use all my hand and use my palm on modificator like Fn, Super or Ctrl.
I want to use all my fingers with a symetric frequency so that’s why I use a Dvorak based layout (Bépo). It’s also not normal for me to have the pinky who need to move and twist for reaching Enter or del, that why I love to have enter and del / backspace on the middle of the board.
I love to have an integrated numpad directly on the right hand, but I hate to have to reach it by moving the hand. So I can accept to use modificator for getting access to the numpad.

So we can play a game.
Can you tell me what keyboard I have ? An ergo one for sure…

Typematrix 2030

In reality most of this is bull****. You don't actually have to move your hands that often, because in most of the cases when you use a section of the keyboard (alphas, pgup pgdown etc), you keep using that section of the keyboard for a number of operations. Having an original layout, most of the times has something to do with the novelty fact, and with the pride of an original and intelligent decision, but nothing beside that. I write most of my text in vim, and then export it into graphical text editors, so you actually need to have keys that you can reach blindly, without masochists and ridicules fingers contortions.

[RabRhee]

I remember the hardships I faced when in about 1985 I had to move from an XT layout keyboard with the function keys on the left, to an AT type with the function keys along the top. The primary work software I used required constant use of function keys and having to reach over the board to hit them was a great hindrance. Eventually of course it became the norm.

I always found that typists would use the numbers at the top of a keyboard and only accountants and other main number crunchers ever used a numpad. For most of the programmers I worked with, the number pad was just extra arrow keys with a bit of padding, so it seemed very sensible to remove the unused numpad, reduce keyboard footprint. The supposed benefits or not to a shorter distance to move the right hand are apparently debatable but it certainly does no harm. The only time I miss it is if some games have them hardcoded or I run out of bonus keys to assign macros to.

[xtrafrood]

For certain 'tasks' I can get by with a 65%.  I can get by a little better when I remap caps as a fn modifier and use hjkl for arrows key, and ui nm for pgup pgdown home end.  For me, not needing to leave the home row for navigation is at times kinda helpful.  For other things (workflows I guess) a full sized ansi 104 (perhaps 104+) keyboard seems to make life a bit easier.  I'm not sure I could effectively use a < 60% keyboard.  Switching tmux windows or just random mundane daily things like password entry would be such a pain for me if I was without a number row.  I guess some people are accustom to AltGr, so the extra function layers might seem like a natural extension of an already useful feature.  Portability seems to be another push for sub 60%--they're easier to sleeve, easier to carry, easier to find space for in between all those bottles of Mountain Dew, and empty Cheetos bags.  I guess they're also super cute for some people.  Why not both?

[Wood_Cables]

Hey I have been using a Planck exclusively for months now, and I don't see myself ever going back to anything bigger. I'm able to do CAD work on it no problem, so the minimal layout didn't hinder any performance.

[ideus]

There is nothing people may say to convince an individual to like a particular keyboard layout. Some facts stand though.


Ergonomics: A full size keyboard plus a mouse caused me wrist pain and pre-carpian-syndrome. I found keyboard boards in look for help to release the pain, and a sixty mechanical keyboard was the solution. I have been happily typing since then.


Programability is another feature most full size keyboard do not have, because they do not need it in the first place. I found that a programmable keyboard could be very fun plus make the keyboard fits your particular needs. With a programmable sixty I turned a very boring typing machine into a fun item that can fits my particular needs, likes and dislikes. What else we may ask for in a device that is always on our face.


Aesthetics: A full size keyboard is by definition set in stone, ugly and boring. Mainly off the rack ones. Mechanical full size and TKLs could take advantage of different sets, but still they follow a fixed design and are as expensive or even more than custom sixty or similar options.


Conclusion: Smaller than full size KB's are not for everyone, but for those of us that have particular preferences are the best thing we can be typing on.

[hieuuk]

I think I read somewhere something about a controller mod which involves replacing some of the electronics of the FC980C to make it programmable. Anyway, I'm not really interested in that, since I use AutoHotkey to do whatever I want with my keyboard.

I'm also using AutoHotKey but to map CTRL + Q = ALT + F4. I'm using Windows but I like the way MAC short cut do. I'm not expert on AutoHotKey though, but once you said you can do it with AHK, I did try to Google and I might able to get Caplock working well with some of the function I need with WASD. I will try with my 1800 to create more fun. Thanks for suggestion.

I'm not trying to convinced people to go 60%, this is more of my personal opinion. I tried 65% and I don't like it.  I found 1800 = amazing, but 60% is fun to play with .

[JWahl]

First post outside of the new member forum.  I've historically preferred full-size layouts but I've used a TKL for a few years with the Novatouch.  Like others, I like that I can keep the keyboard closer to center aligned when touch-typing without having to reach as far to the mouse.  A few weeks back, I ended up buying a mechanical numpad off of Amazon for data entry, but having it on the right made me miss the ergonomics of the TKL. 

More recently, I planned to buy an 1800 layout in the form of the Leopold FC980M, but I instead opted for the FC660M which I received today.  It's probably as small as I'm willing to go though, I can't give up the arrow cluster.  I'm also trying my numpad out on the left side, which while very awkward at first, has some theoretical advantages in certain applications.  For example, number entry in spreadsheets would allow me to keep the left hand on the numpad while my right hand can stay on the mouse or arrow keys.  I also like the inherent modularity of being able to move the numpad out of the way when I don't need it.

The one thing for me that really exaggerated the annoyance of mouse-reaching was getting used to the trackpoint on my thinkpads.  I ended up buying an external thinkpad keyboard a few months back just for that reason, but I ended up missing having mechanical keys.  The Tex Yoda might be nice for me if it had arrow keys and was a little less expensive.  The Tex Kodachi is just too rich for my blood right now.  For now, the smaller Leopold is ideal for my needs and budget.

[Kyi195]

At my job I actually did get a smaller board for space reasons.  I was using a stock Dell 104 board (the one comming with new x040 and x050 models) but that was just too much.  Dug up an old Asus chicklet board that's got a slightly modified 1800 layout and that was too much still.  My workstation was a desktop support tech workbench that had my station as well as 7 hookups for our office KVM and my personal laptop so I can have some music while I work.  I ended up dropping down to a 40% and a trackball because moving my hand in such a confined space was too much.  Because I don't do a lot of number crunching and because I hardly ever use the F-keys (I think I use F4 and F5 the most, but with Win10 you can Ctrl+L and focus the address bar now so I use F4 even less) I was able to sacrifice both the number and function rows.

Last week I switched desks.  Moved a good 4 feet to the left and actually have a DESK desk now with lots of space.  I might go and build another 65% for work (I currently use a whitefox at home).  My issue is I want a split spacebar.  My 40 has it and I have fallen in love with the concept since I only hit space with my right hand anyways.  I set my arrows under A/S/D/F like a mirrored vim arrow layout with home/end/pgup/pgdn directly under mapped to Z/X/C/V.

I've thrown a pic of my new workstation on.  While I adopted this ancient trackball because of my lack of space at my last spot, I love the thing so even if I do change boards I think I'm gonna keep the mouse.

[rowdy]

I'd been absent from these boards for several years and just logged back on, and boy, I barely recognize myself?

Whats up with all these TKL and 60% boards and other weirdo layouts?   How come people even like them?

I've been into mechs since the mid-2000s and even then the HHKB and Deck Francium 87 were highlights of the hobbyist community.

How long ago is 'several years' because I think the last time smaller keyboards weren't popular it was the 80s. )

Well, maybe I don't recall the small form factor keyboards from back then.  Iv'e been using Model M's since they were new, but I strayed away fro several years during the 90's, only getting back to it the early ought when I found a Lexmark Model M for $9 on eBay.  I forget when I was here last.  It's been a while, but not THAT long...

August 2012?

That's a long time.

Back then, which is around when I joined looking for help to repair or replace an Nec keyboard, there were half a dozen keyboard manufacturers, and about the same custom keycap makers.

Now there are hundreds of each, too many choices to decide, and almost anything available at almost any price.

Progress?

Also it's ironic that keyboards are getting smaller but monitors are getting bigger.  Maybe the kids need the extra desk space saved by using a smaller keyboard to support their 42"+ monitors?

[Kevadu]

Personally I'm sort of amazed that in 2019 there are still people who manually type in numbers for work...why don't you have automated systems for ingesting and processing your data?  Having humans do it is not only incredibly slow, it's also a great way to introduce errors.

I haven't touched a numpad in years.  For me they are completely superfluous.  I still like the look and feel of a lot of my vintage keyboards but I'm getting to the the point where they feel like complete dinosaurs from a usability perspective.  Particularly since I want my mouse--which I do use--closer to the keys I actually type on.

[daerid]

Personally I'm sort of amazed that in 2019 there are still people who manually type in numbers for work...why don't you have automated systems for ingesting and processing your data?  Having humans do it is not only incredibly slow, it's also a great way to introduce errors.

Wow... you really can't imagine a scenario where somebody might need to type in a number for work? Computers should just always enter every number everywhere? Even credit card numbers, expiration dates, birth dates, etc..

Not to mention the people who have to actually write the code and algorithms that power those computer systems? That usually require numbers.

I don't know if I'll ever stop being amazed at the mentality of "I haven't done X in forever / I don't do X, so therefore there's no reason for anybody to do X". I just don't get that level of self-centered-ness.

[_GMK_]

An engineer can't exist without a 100% keyboard. Smaller than 100%? Not an engineer.

[Kevadu]

Wow... you really can't imagine a scenario where somebody might need to type in a number for work? Computers should just always enter every number everywhere? Even credit card numbers, expiration dates, birth dates, etc..

I meant regular data entry tasks where a numpad would be genuinely useful.  You don't need a numpad just for entering the occasional credit card number...

Not to mention the people who have to actually write the code and algorithms that power those computer systems? That usually require numbers.

Um, I that's what I do.  And no, it really doesn't require much in the way of numbers.  Algorithms should be expressed algorithmically.  In fact if you have a lot of hardcoded numbers in your program you'll likely be eviscerated in a code review.  That's bad form.

[ddot]

I've found a programmable 65% + number pad to work best for me at the office.  I'm part of a small team, so there's not a lot of specialization or delegation around here.  Everything from drafting to field review to reports based on those field reviews is part of my day.  If I'm drafting, having the mouse (trackball technically) closer is a lot more comfortable.  Having something smaller than a fullsized / TKL / 1800 allows me to do that.  If I'm entering data from the field, a number pad is highly useful.  If I'm typing a report, having the arrow keys right under my fingers as part of the programmable layers is quick and easy.  But if I'm more in drafting mode and my hand tends to be mostly on my mouse, finding a dedicated set of arrow keys is a lot easier than orientating myself on home row and finding my function layers, so a 65% works better for me than a 60% does.  I also found that I rarely used the F keys, so they were expendable.  Add it all up and a 65% + number pad seems to fit my needs the best.

An engineer can't exist without a 100% keyboard. Smaller than 100%? Not an engineer.

I'm pretty sure that's an engineering degree hanging on my wall.  And as I said, I have a 65% + a standalone number pad in front of me.

Personally I'm sort of amazed that in 2019 there are still people who manually type in numbers for work...why don't you have automated systems for ingesting and processing your data?

If you can write an algorithm to OCR my chicken scratch notes from the field, I'd be all over that.

I don't know if I'll ever stop being amazed at the mentality of "I haven't done X in forever / I don't do X, so therefore there's no reason for anybody to do X". I just don't get that level of self-centered-ness.

Amen

[SpAmRaY]

An engineer can't exist without a 100% keyboard. Smaller than 100%? Not an engineer.

Lol ok, I'll tell my department they're all doing it wrong.

I haven't used a 100% layout in a few years. (But I still have a numpad on my board for now.) Some others here switched to tkl's, etc.

I'm going to try switching back to HHKB again, might have to get another 23UB though.

Personally I'm sort of amazed that in 2019 there are still people who manually type in numbers for work...why don't you have automated systems for ingesting and processing your data?  Having humans do it is not only incredibly slow, it's also a great way to introduce errors.

Believe it or not some of us still do very large industrial projects using hand written notes that are manually entered into a program, including lots of numbers.

We also still use scales and calculators.

But I agree it's easy to mess up and put something in wrong. (This one time I did a calculation wrong and we spent a large sum unnecessarily.)

Also I occasionally need to enter characters using alt-codes. This could be worked around but it's usually easier to type alt+0176 vs the alternative.

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

[_GMK_]

An engineer can't exist without a 100% keyboard. Smaller than 100%? Not an engineer.

Lol ok, I'll tell my department they're all doing it wrong.

I haven't used a 100% layout in a few years. (But I still have a numpad on my board for now.) Some others here switched to tkl's, etc.

I'm going to try switching back to HHKB again, might have to get another 23UB though.

Personally I'm sort of amazed that in 2019 there are still people who manually type in numbers for work...why don't you have automated systems for ingesting and processing your data?  Having humans do it is not only incredibly slow, it's also a great way to introduce errors.

Believe it or not some of us still do very large industrial projects using hand written notes that are manually entered into a program, including lots of numbers.

We also still use scales and calculators.

But I agree it's easy to mess up and put something in wrong. (This one time I did a calculation wrong and we spent a large sum unnecessarily.)

Also I occasionally need to enter characters using alt-codes. This could be worked around but it's usually easier to type alt+0176 vs the alternative.

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

How can you input ASCII codes without a programmable keyboard? Your engineering department is laughable.

[thearctican]

There are an awful lot of very strong opinions in this thread!

Biggest board I use on a day-to-day basis is my C70. Currently using a Preonic, and the HHKB remains my favorite layout.

With layers anything is possible. I even have a numpad layout on this Preonic, and all of my nav keys (Page Up, Down, Home, End, etc.) are on a layer above my arrow keys. It's easy enough, and I don't even have to think about it anymore. I'm much faster now on an HHKB than I ever was on my Model Ms or TKL boards.

I do enjoy a nice TKL, but it's been a long time since I've needed a tenkey. I don't do enough data entry or long number strings to justify the desk space anymore, and I'm only a little slower on the number row nowadays anyway.

[ideus]

On weird small keyboard layouts: This thing works now even better than my regular daily driver with a HHKB layout.

[Sent]

On weird small keyboard layouts: This thing works now even better than my regular daily driver with a HHKB layout.

Show Image

What board is this? 👀

[ideus]

On weird small keyboard layouts: This thing works now even better than my regular daily driver with a HHKB layout.

Show Image

What board is this? 👀

You can find the kit here. Works awesome with my swedish layout. It comes with alu cases as well, but this one allows people to see your dancing led lights by its sides.

[Sent]

Ah, I actually have that!  Lol.  The case just looked really different in this shot, I guess.  I haven't used mine much since they shipped it with the wrong switches and didn't do anything to rectify the issue.  It left a bad taste in my mouth so it's been sitting on my shelf in protest.

[ideus]

Ah, I actually have that!  Lol.  The case just looked really different in this shot, I guess.  I haven't used mine much since they shipped it with the wrong switches and didn't do anything to rectify the issue.  It left a bad taste in my mouth so it's been sitting on my shelf in protest.

Sounds that she needs a new sugar daddy? 

[Sent]

Ah, I actually have that!  Lol.  The case just looked really different in this shot, I guess.  I haven't used mine much since they shipped it with the wrong switches and didn't do anything to rectify the issue.  It left a bad taste in my mouth so it's been sitting on my shelf in protest.

Sounds that she needs a new sugar daddy? 

I thought about it, hah.  When I get around to it, I'll throw some tuned switches in it.  I do like the layout, though.  If it's between that or a 60%, I'm faster on that.  Go figure.

[ideus]

Ah, I actually have that!  Lol.  The case just looked really different in this shot, I guess.  I haven't used mine much since they shipped it with the wrong switches and didn't do anything to rectify the issue.  It left a bad taste in my mouth so it's been sitting on my shelf in protest.

Sounds that she needs a new sugar daddy? 

I thought about it, hah.  When I get around to it, I'll throw some tuned switches in it.  I do like the layout, though.  If it's between that or a 60%, I'm faster on that.  Go figure.

I got my own little pain on my learning curve; some frustration with its programming that the developer graciously help with, and now I can type even a bit faster with the thing than with my regular HHKB's. Go figure.

[Sent]

Split space was such a godsend.  I love it.  For me, it's so easy to just use that as my main fn key.  I really think this particular form factor is my new sweet spot.  Hoping that the TM050 has a R2 or new boards come out.  If I had the know-how, I'd be tempted to try and design one.

[1swt2gs]

108 takes up so much space.

esp at work when i have to switch off between mouse and keyboard a lot , the reach is soooo far.

[ideus]

Split space was such a godsend.  I love it.  For me, it's so easy to just use that as my main fn key.  I really think this particular form factor is my new sweet spot.  Hoping that the TM050 has a R2 or new boards come out.  If I had the know-how, I'd be tempted to try and design one.

The key for split to work well is where the gap between the two sides of the space bar is actually located. This is the only layout that has it at the right spot for me. The right is the space and the left is a huge FN. I also have VIM arrow keys along with space-FN (right space) and that works wonders. The dedicated arrows have navigation keys under and again that is far better than the HHKB's solution, wich is great by the way, but this is even more intuitive.

[xtrafrood]

Split space was such a godsend.  I love it.  For me, it's so easy to just use that as my main fn key.  I really think this particular form factor is my new sweet spot.  Hoping that the TM050 has a R2 or new boards come out.  If I had the know-how, I'd be tempted to try and design one.

The key for split to work well is where the gap between the two sides of the space bar is actually located. This is the only layout that has it at the right spot for me. The right is the space and the left is a huge FN. I also have VIM arrow keys along with space-FN (right space) and that works wonders. The dedicated arrows have navigation keys under and again that is far better than the HHKB's solution, wich is great by the way, but this is even more intuitive.

Split space does sound pretty great.  Using caps as a fn key for hjkl + navigation is a bit cumbersome at times.

[Sent]

Split space was such a godsend.  I love it.  For me, it's so easy to just use that as my main fn key.  I really think this particular form factor is my new sweet spot.  Hoping that the TM050 has a R2 or new boards come out.  If I had the know-how, I'd be tempted to try and design one.

The key for split to work well is where the gap between the two sides of the space bar is actually located. This is the only layout that has it at the right spot for me. The right is the space and the left is a huge FN. I also have VIM arrow keys along with space-FN (right space) and that works wonders. The dedicated arrows have navigation keys under and again that is far better than the HHKB's solution, wich is great by the way, but this is even more intuitive.

Yup, exactly.  The placement for them is ideal for me, as well.  I'm going to see about messaging a few people and maybe...hmmm...

[ander]

Okay, TKLs make sense if if you never use the number pad. I miss it right away, as I can no longer use Alt+#### codes to enter special characters like dashes, bullets, or accented letters (as IBM, in their wisdom, decided not to make them work with the regular number keys). But I realize that's not important to everyone. (Ha, I just used a dash, Alt+0151.)...

I felt compelled to explain that, apparently, I'd typed something using a long dash ( — ), referred to its Alt-code, then ended up editing it out. So no, that didn't make sense. And yet, I've committed no crimes against humanity, so I'm feeling pretty good all told.

Before I wouldn't think I'm able to use any less then TKL too, until I try and love it. The strong benefit of it is that you don't actually need to move your hand too much when you writing (for me is coding). I set the caplock to FN, then I'm mainly using WASD as nav buttons. E R = Home End, FN + BackSpace or FN + ESC = Delete. I also have a set of Nav bar at the bottom right of the keyboard for when I only need moving around while not fully typing mode. Check my screenshot for my set up.

Yeesh, you're welcome to dat stuff—it'd drive me nuts. Making typing harder just for the effect of having an impossibly compact-looking keeb or whatever? I must be missing something.