I don't disagree with anything you've said. But inclusiveness? Quotas? That's combating the symptom, not the problem. And when you bring up that point- most dismiss you as part of the problem. I've seen the negative effects of trying to solve the problem by addressing the symptoms. The underlying problem just gets worse.
Nobody mentioned quotas. Asking "why is there no hispanic mod?" says nothing about quotas.
I'm talking about the situation in general. Apparently, I was the only one who didn't get the memo that this was not supposed to be serious. I mean, if you put serious in it, then some are going to assume that you mean it. Words to mean things. But you invited to have a real talk, and since this topic is one that I'd like to discuss in a rational manner, I tried to redirect to the topic of 'diversification' rather than anything to do with the OP.
But, why are there no hispanic mods, is just as racist as the other way around IMO, if not backed up with qualifications. A better question to pose, IMO, is "I think X is a great choice for a mod because (list the reasons). Also, she's X so it helps with the content of the moderation team." "Why is there no hispanic mod?" speaks directly to quotas- that there should be one just because. Then, as someone else points, out, you open the way to why are there no black, asian, indian, etc mods. So for me the answer to such questions is, "there haven't been any applicants that satisfied the requirements that were of that specific ethnic group. If anyone appeared that satisfied our objective criteria (and go into them if possible), then they would surely be on the short list for a position. Do you have any suggestions that would fit that criteria and that demographic?"
Removing obstacles and exclusions for qualified applications. Not including just because of some demographic. That's where
token came from, i.e. done for the sake of appearances or as a symbolic gesture. Is it just gestures we're after? Or a real discussion and solution? Because with just a token in place, the conversation turns to "X was put in the position because she's Y", which overshadows the good work and the qualifications they might have.