Dude.. LOL are you naive..
No, not particulartly. But you know that already.
or do you think that of the rest of us are..
Nope.
You can ONLY say exactly what you said in this situation.....
Hmm... that's some poorly constructed reasoning. Perhaps even... illogical?
It wasn't a choice... so we could already "assume" before you responded, that that's what you would've said..
Well clearly you couldn't assume. but other people apparently can, and can do so quite correctly I might add.
Had it not been a choice and had you correctly assumed then you would have known you were wrong.
Ah but... something, blah, blah 20/20. ;)
Let me clarify
Go for it.
I don't fault you or think poorly of you "IF you were the seller"
Thanks, good to know. I can read though so I wasn't worried. I thought it would be nice to let others know more about me since there was so much speculation. I think you threw people off with the "purity" and "gouging" terms revolving around assumed underhanded practices.
I'm merely saying that those who seem to definitively "assert" that you're not the seller is baseless...
Was that really an issue? I think you just made that up. =P
Those "assertions" maybe total 3 whole members in this entire thread. Don't forget they were basically right too.
So apparently not baseless, they seemed to have based their thoughts off of personal correspondence and/or my writings and actions. Sounds pretty "based" to me.
Again, for clarity, if you knew that was what I was to say, how did you not know they were mostly right?
My argument is not against "you", it is against the kids who are being illogical.
Ok Spock.
Those "kids" were basically right though. So what's more illogical (improperly used), baseless assumptions that were mostly wrong, or well founded assumptions that were mostly right?
Funny thing that "logic", it tends to devalue the human experience when thrown around. Especially when used in a purely clinical fashion on a forum full of enthusiasts.
You should try and take some logic classes, they're fun, I recommend them. I had a focus in logic in college and I try preach it when teaching, lecturing, training, and performing demonstrations.
But something tells me none of this was the point of your posts. Nothing really wrong with being a contrarian, habitual or not, you just happen to be quite prolific at it. It's very important to try and think outside the box or the norm, even when you're still stuck inside it. It's a good
exercise from time to time.
If somehow you're not a contrarian with an unfortunate bout of depression then unfortunately I think your cynical
scope, ulterior motive detector, and logic machine seem broken. Try plugging them in first? =P
For the tldr crowd-- tp4tissue was still wrong
- wont accept this ^
- I can read
- Broken record
- Something, something, blah-blah, Star Trek
- Closet contrarian
- P.I.N.T.O.
(put in nickle to operate) A.K.A. 1st rule of troubleshooting- Is it plugged in?
- CC had the night off apparently
