8 bit srgb gamuts were on old crts. only extended gamut ips would beat them.
and yup, dat refresh rate on crts.
i just got a u2312 hm because I hate giant old boxes and needed the cheapest acceptable alternative. [acceptable by my standards]
i feel like the ONLY real replacement for crt right now is lightboost..
without lightboost, you just don't get the motion clarity..
Even with lightboost, it's not quite as fast as crt.
Is it a noticeable difference? Between lightboost and non-lightboost monitors?
In terms of "motion clarity", the difference is night and day... between lightboost and non-lightboost
for still images.. no difference.. from regular lcd panel
____regular LCD technically produce better stills vs CRT and Lightboosted LCD.. because it has no flicker
____Lightboosted LCD technically HAS flicker because it's flashing the backlight, but @ 120hz it is well beyond what most people can perceive..
_______on CRT, you need 90hz+ to completely not see flicker, I can see bit of flicker all the way up to 87hz. It's possible there are people who can see even faster flicker than 90hz..
for input response time...video card to image drawn on screen.. light boost has no difference.. from regular lcd panel
____vs crt, crt is 10x faster in terms of input response of the Fastest LCD.
___ This is why purists continue to game on CRT... ALTHOUGH.... the advantage of which is not huge in terms of performance..
___ Visually.. CRT gaming is still more appealing because it feels instantaneous and ice-like.. whereas LCD feels a bit like wait-and-drag..