Author Topic: US Supreme Court Strikes Down Contraceptive Mandate  (Read 2466 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline microsoft windows

  • Blue Troll of Death
  • * Exalted Elder
  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 3621
  • President of geekhack.org
    • Get Internet Explorer 6
US Supreme Court Strikes Down Contraceptive Mandate
« on: Mon, 30 June 2014, 10:47:02 »
Looks like Hobby Lobby has won its lawsuit against Kathleen Sebelius and the federal government over the contraception mandate included in Obamacare. How do you feel about that court decision?

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/06/30/supreme-court-hobby-lobby/

CLICK HERE!     OFFICIAL PRESIDENT OF GEEKHACK.ORG    MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN MERRY CHRISTMAS

Online tp4tissue

  • * Destiny Supporter
  • Posts: 13722
  • Location: Official Geekhack Public Defender..
  • OmniExpert of: Rice, Top-Ramen, Ergodox, n Females
Re: US Supreme Court Strikes Down Contraceptive Mandate
« Reply #1 on: Mon, 30 June 2014, 14:09:58 »
Looks like Hobby Lobby has won its lawsuit against Kathleen Sebelius and the federal government over the contraception mandate included in Obamacare. How do you feel about that court decision?

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/06/30/supreme-court-hobby-lobby/

Show Image


so... wait i don't get it..  businesses can opt out of providing contraceptives?

but.. obama care was per the individual? is it not?    is this a section of obama care that covers differently for a company?

Offline JinDesu

  • * Destiny Supporter
  • Posts: 303
Re: US Supreme Court Strikes Down Contraceptive Mandate
« Reply #2 on: Mon, 30 June 2014, 14:16:56 »
Looks like Hobby Lobby has won its lawsuit against Kathleen Sebelius and the federal government over the contraception mandate included in Obamacare. How do you feel about that court decision?

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/06/30/supreme-court-hobby-lobby/

Show Image


so... wait i don't get it..  businesses can opt out of providing contraceptives?

but.. obama care was per the individual? is it not?    is this a section of obama care that covers differently for a company?

The ACA requires that all individuals purchase health insurance, unless they are provided it through their employment.

In this case, the employer (Hobby Lobby) opted out of paying for contraceptives as part of their coverage plan. The ACA included contraceptives as an item that can be provided without patient co-payment, but what Hobby Lobby wanted was for their employees to not be able to obtain contraceptives through the company insurance.
Someday somebody will best me, but it won't be today, and it won't be you.

Proud owner of a Filco Majestouch Cherry MX Blue Tenkeyless, KBT Race S, & Realforce 101

Online tp4tissue

  • * Destiny Supporter
  • Posts: 13722
  • Location: Official Geekhack Public Defender..
  • OmniExpert of: Rice, Top-Ramen, Ergodox, n Females
Re: US Supreme Court Strikes Down Contraceptive Mandate
« Reply #3 on: Mon, 30 June 2014, 14:28:34 »
Looks like Hobby Lobby has won its lawsuit against Kathleen Sebelius and the federal government over the contraception mandate included in Obamacare. How do you feel about that court decision?

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/06/30/supreme-court-hobby-lobby/

Show Image


so... wait i don't get it..  businesses can opt out of providing contraceptives?

but.. obama care was per the individual? is it not?    is this a section of obama care that covers differently for a company?

The ACA requires that all individuals purchase health insurance, unless they are provided it through their employment.

In this case, the employer (Hobby Lobby) opted out of paying for contraceptives as part of their coverage plan. The ACA included contraceptives as an item that can be provided without patient co-payment, but what Hobby Lobby wanted was for their employees to not be able to obtain contraceptives through the company insurance.

couldn't the individual just get their own insurance?  I don't see why Hobby Lobby would bother.. unless they assume they're only hiring completely inept 100% internet-illiterates..

Offline JinDesu

  • * Destiny Supporter
  • Posts: 303
Re: US Supreme Court Strikes Down Contraceptive Mandate
« Reply #4 on: Mon, 30 June 2014, 14:41:01 »
Looks like Hobby Lobby has won its lawsuit against Kathleen Sebelius and the federal government over the contraception mandate included in Obamacare. How do you feel about that court decision?

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/06/30/supreme-court-hobby-lobby/

Show Image


so... wait i don't get it..  businesses can opt out of providing contraceptives?

but.. obama care was per the individual? is it not?    is this a section of obama care that covers differently for a company?

The ACA requires that all individuals purchase health insurance, unless they are provided it through their employment.

In this case, the employer (Hobby Lobby) opted out of paying for contraceptives as part of their coverage plan. The ACA included contraceptives as an item that can be provided without patient co-payment, but what Hobby Lobby wanted was for their employees to not be able to obtain contraceptives through the company insurance.

couldn't the individual just get their own insurance?  I don't see why Hobby Lobby would bother.. unless they assume they're only hiring completely inept 100% internet-illiterates..

Typically company health insurance costs less than private insurance, due to discounts given by the insurance company. The individuals can get their own insurance, but generally company health insurance is considered an incentive to the job. If the company's health insurance is denying the individual certain features (to the point where they have to pay for their own insurance), then that's sorta like getting a paycut - so the individual should weigh whether to continue working for that company or not.

Hobby Lobby bothered because they wanted to make a religious statement. To them, contraceptives are against their religion so they do not want to pay for health insurance that covers it.
Someday somebody will best me, but it won't be today, and it won't be you.

Proud owner of a Filco Majestouch Cherry MX Blue Tenkeyless, KBT Race S, & Realforce 101

Offline vivalarevolución

  • Posts: 2146
  • Location: Naptown, Indiana, USA
  • Keep it real b/c any other way is too stressful
Re: US Supreme Court Strikes Down Contraceptive Mandate
« Reply #5 on: Mon, 30 June 2014, 14:45:49 »
I never understood why an employer should be responsible for paying for your contraceptives.  Seriously.  So you want to have sex, but not make babies.  Ok.  Go and buy yourself some contraceptives.

If the government wants people to have free contraceptives, they should pay for it, not make an employer pay for it with their health care plan.  Allow people to get them mail ordered or put them in every government office or whatever.  But how does it makes sense to force employers to pay for contraceptives?
Wish I had some gif or quote for this space, but I got nothing

Online tp4tissue

  • * Destiny Supporter
  • Posts: 13722
  • Location: Official Geekhack Public Defender..
  • OmniExpert of: Rice, Top-Ramen, Ergodox, n Females
Re: US Supreme Court Strikes Down Contraceptive Mandate
« Reply #6 on: Mon, 30 June 2014, 14:46:24 »
Looks like Hobby Lobby has won its lawsuit against Kathleen Sebelius and the federal government over the contraception mandate included in Obamacare. How do you feel about that court decision?

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/06/30/supreme-court-hobby-lobby/

Show Image


so... wait i don't get it..  businesses can opt out of providing contraceptives?

but.. obama care was per the individual? is it not?    is this a section of obama care that covers differently for a company?

The ACA requires that all individuals purchase health insurance, unless they are provided it through their employment.

In this case, the employer (Hobby Lobby) opted out of paying for contraceptives as part of their coverage plan. The ACA included contraceptives as an item that can be provided without patient co-payment, but what Hobby Lobby wanted was for their employees to not be able to obtain contraceptives through the company insurance.

couldn't the individual just get their own insurance?  I don't see why Hobby Lobby would bother.. unless they assume they're only hiring completely inept 100% internet-illiterates..

Typically company health insurance costs less than private insurance, due to discounts given by the insurance company. The individuals can get their own insurance, but generally company health insurance is considered an incentive to the job. If the company's health insurance is denying the individual certain features (to the point where they have to pay for their own insurance), then that's sorta like getting a paycut - so the individual should weigh whether to continue working for that company or not.

Hobby Lobby bothered because they wanted to make a religious statement. To them, contraceptives are against their religion so they do not want to pay for health insurance that covers it.

Sigh.. that's so dumb.. don't they realize that the majority of the educated world does not Actually believe in Christianity and merely adhere to it as a social-club?



Offline dorkvader

  • Posts: 6289
  • Location: Boston area
  • all about the "hack" in "geekhack"
Re: US Supreme Court Strikes Down Contraceptive Mandate
« Reply #7 on: Mon, 30 June 2014, 15:30:48 »

Sigh.. that's so dumb.. don't they realize that the majority of the educated world does not Actually believe in Christianity and merely adhere to it as a social-club?
I've met a lot of social Christians, but they are certainly a minority where I used to live (in the bible belt).

I never understood why an employer should be responsible for paying for your contraceptives.  Seriously.  So you want to have sex, but not make babies.  Ok.  Go and buy yourself some contraceptives.

If the government wants people to have free contraceptives, they should pay for it, not make an employer pay for it with their health care plan.  Allow people to get them mail ordered or put them in every government office or whatever.  But how does it makes sense to force employers to pay for contraceptives?

Agreed. there are good ways to address this issue and this is certainly one of them.

Offline paicrai

  • Actually a Jane Austen novel
  • * Destiny Supporter
  • Posts: 470
  • Location: sun stuff
  • mindblank
Re: US Supreme Court Strikes Down Contraceptive Mandate
« Reply #8 on: Mon, 30 June 2014, 15:39:26 »
let's hope this doesn't (ironically) derail into a religion thread
THE FEMINIST ILLUMINATI

I will literally **** you raw paicrai, I hope you're legal by the time I meet you.
👌👀👌👀👌👀👌👀👌👀 good **** go౦ԁ ****👌 thats ✔ some good👌👌**** right👌👌th 👌 ere👌👌👌 right✔there ✔✔if i do ƽaү so my self 💯  i say so 💯  thats what im talking about right there right there (chorus: ʳᶦᵍʰᵗ ᵗʰᵉʳᵉ) mMMMMᎷМ💯 👌👌 👌НO0ОଠOOOOOОଠଠOoooᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒ👌 👌👌 👌 💯 👌 👀 👀 👀 👌👌Good ****

Offline Puddsy

  • nice
  • * Elated Elder
  • Posts: 12281
  • Location: RSTLN E
  • "Do you shovel to survive, or survive to shovel?"
Re: US Supreme Court Strikes Down Contraceptive Mandate
« Reply #9 on: Mon, 30 June 2014, 16:24:08 »
welp

good thing most major cities provide free condoms

just fix sex-ed and this is less of a problem than it is

even so, it's a pretty big problem
QFR | MJ2 TKL | "Bulgogiboard" (Keycon 104) | ctrl.alt x GON 60% | TGR Alice | Mira SE #29 | Mira SE #34 | Revo One | z | Keycult No. 1 | First CW87 prototype | Mech27v1 | Camp C225 | Duck Orion V1 | LZ CLS sxh | Geon Frog TKL | Hiney TKL One | Geon Glare TKL



"Everything is worse, but in a barely perceptible and indefinable way" -dollartacos, after I came back from a break | "Is Linkshine our Nixon?" -NAV | "Puddsy is the Puddsy of keebs" -ns90

Offline Malphas

  • Posts: 247
Re: US Supreme Court Strikes Down Contraceptive Mandate
« Reply #10 on: Mon, 30 June 2014, 16:26:07 »
The title sounds like a bigger deal than it really is. The reality is some "closely held" companies can squirm out of providing contraception on religious grounds, but it only referred to morning-after pills, which could be ideologically argued are along the lines of abortion. This ruling didn't have effect over preventative contraceptives.

This won't go much further on a wider scale. A few privately held companies with religious owners might do this on ideological grounds, but public-limited companies won't be able to, and really no large corporation in their right mind would want to go down this road because the PR backlash is going to massively outweigh the minuscule financial savings from not providing certain contraceptives as part of their insurance plan.

Online fohat.digs

  • * Elevated Elder
  • Posts: 6533
  • Location: 35°55'N, 83°53'W
  • weird funny old guy
Re: US Supreme Court Strikes Down Contraceptive Mandate
« Reply #11 on: Mon, 30 June 2014, 18:33:21 »
let's hope this doesn't (ironically) derail into a religion thread

It has nothing to do with religion. It is only about money. Hobby Lobby does not want to pay for health care.

Birth control is a health care issue, just as is pregnancy. It took a long time for pregnancy to be accepted as a natural aspect of life rather than a disease-like condition. Almost all health care providers pay for Viagra.

And all 5 justices supporting this measure were men.

PS - I am a man and a father. Sex and babies are a part of life. (just don't tell my 16-year-old daughter that)



"However, even though I was born in the Mesozoic, I do know what anyone who wants to reach out to young people should say: Billionaires took your money. They took your chance to buy a home. They took your chance at a good education. They stole your opportunities. Billionaires took the things you want in life. If you really want those things, you have to take them back.
That's the message. That's the whole message. Say that every day, not just to reach America's frustrated young white men, but people of every age, race, and gender.
Late-stage capitalism is a wealth-concentration engine, focused on vacuuming up every dollar and putting it in as few hands as possible. Republicans are helping that vacuum suck.
How does a tiny fraction of the population get away with this? They do it by dividing the other 99% of Americans against themselves."
- Marc Sumner 2025-05-30

Offline paicrai

  • Actually a Jane Austen novel
  • * Destiny Supporter
  • Posts: 470
  • Location: sun stuff
  • mindblank
Re: US Supreme Court Strikes Down Contraceptive Mandate
« Reply #12 on: Mon, 30 June 2014, 18:37:18 »
let's hope this doesn't (ironically) derail into a religion thread

It has nothing to do with religion. It is only about money. Hobby Lobby does not want to pay for health care.

Birth control is a health care issue, just as is pregnancy. It took a long time for pregnancy to be accepted as a natural aspect of life rather than a disease-like condition. Almost all health care providers pay for Viagra.

And all 5 justices supporting this measure were men.

PS - I am a man and a father. Sex and babies are a part of life. (just don't tell my 16-year-old daughter that)
someone mentioned religion and we know how much people love railing on religion, that's why i said that
THE FEMINIST ILLUMINATI

I will literally **** you raw paicrai, I hope you're legal by the time I meet you.
👌👀👌👀👌👀👌👀👌👀 good **** go౦ԁ ****👌 thats ✔ some good👌👌**** right👌👌th 👌 ere👌👌👌 right✔there ✔✔if i do ƽaү so my self 💯  i say so 💯  thats what im talking about right there right there (chorus: ʳᶦᵍʰᵗ ᵗʰᵉʳᵉ) mMMMMᎷМ💯 👌👌 👌НO0ОଠOOOOOОଠଠOoooᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒ👌 👌👌 👌 💯 👌 👀 👀 👀 👌👌Good ****