Author Topic: KUL or CODE for cherry mx clear?  (Read 7995 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline petereps

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 4
  • Location: USA
KUL or CODE for cherry mx clear?
« on: Thu, 17 July 2014, 11:05:30 »
So after trying mx browns and deciding I would like a heavier more tactile keyswitch, I am looking for a board with mx clears. I also need arrow keys so the Poker massdrop isnt an option. This leaves me with either the KUL 87 or the CODE 87. Which board do you think I would be happier with? Just looking for opinions and advice. Thank you!  :thumb:

Offline dante

  • Posts: 2553
Re: KUL or CODE for cherry mx clear?
« Reply #1 on: Thu, 17 July 2014, 11:21:52 »
KUL feels more solid.  And they believe in their product: 2 year (KUL) vs. 1 year (WASD)

Offline inanis

  • Truly Literally The Cloud
  • * Destiny Supporter
  • Posts: 790
  • Location: Dark Places
    • SEALWoodworking
Re: KUL or CODE for cherry mx clear?
« Reply #2 on: Thu, 17 July 2014, 12:22:49 »
I have two CODEs with Clears. Both feel solid and well built. I have not used the KUL so I can't compare it against that. One negative thing about the CODE is the amount of ping it produces. It really annoyed me at first, but then I got used to it and now I only notice if I'm listening for it. Some of the ping issue is probably my fault though, I tend to really hammer the keys so I'm sure the amount of force I'm using is making that situation worse. All in all, I really like it. I bought a second to match my first so that has to be a good sign.
Some hearts are gallows, I'm not here for hangin' around

Offline petereps

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 4
  • Location: USA
Re: KUL or CODE for cherry mx clear?
« Reply #3 on: Thu, 17 July 2014, 12:32:33 »
I have two CODEs with Clears. Both feel solid and well built. I have not used the KUL so I can't compare it against that. One negative thing about the CODE is the amount of ping it produces. It really annoyed me at first, but then I got used to it and now I only notice if I'm listening for it. Some of the ping issue is probably my fault though, I tend to really hammer the keys so I'm sure the amount of force I'm using is making that situation worse. All in all, I really like it. I bought a second to match my first so that has to be a good sign.

Hm I feel like the ping would drive me insane haha. My current keyboard does that with the spacebar and it drives me wild. I think I am pretty settled on the KUL but I'll have to sleep on it

Offline cribbit

  • Posts: 288
Re: KUL or CODE for cherry mx clear?
« Reply #4 on: Thu, 17 July 2014, 13:27:04 »
Fn + WASD is arrows on the Poker. The full programmability of the poker makes up for all the missing keys.
I typed this post on my Slanck. I also developed a stronger, cleaner, easier handwiring method.


Offline Lu_e

  • Posts: 652
  • Location: NWUSA
Re: KUL or CODE for cherry mx clear?
« Reply #5 on: Thu, 17 July 2014, 13:56:05 »
One has cherry stabilizers one has costar... so that may factor into your decision?

Just say NO to ABS keycaps

Offline tp4tissue

  • * Destiny Supporter
  • Posts: 13722
  • Location: Official Geekhack Public Defender..
  • OmniExpert of: Rice, Top-Ramen, Ergodox, n Females
Re: KUL or CODE for cherry mx clear?
« Reply #6 on: Thu, 17 July 2014, 14:02:50 »
One has cherry stabilizers one has costar... so that may factor into your decision?

Costar win.. 100%.. it's smoother, less sensitive to key cap warp induced stroke imbalance,

AND easy to fix / retune....  if something is out of place..

cherry stab, much harder to work with..

Offline Puddsy

  • nice
  • * Elated Elder
  • Posts: 12281
  • Location: RSTLN E
  • "Do you shovel to survive, or survive to shovel?"
Re: KUL or CODE for cherry mx clear?
« Reply #7 on: Thu, 17 July 2014, 15:27:17 »
But cherry stabs make it SO MUCH EASIER to change keycaps

My vote is VERY MUCH for the KUL. It's just a better keyboard overall. I love mine.
QFR | MJ2 TKL | "Bulgogiboard" (Keycon 104) | ctrl.alt x GON 60% | TGR Alice | Mira SE #29 | Mira SE #34 | Revo One | z | Keycult No. 1 | First CW87 prototype | Mech27v1 | Camp C225 | Duck Orion V1 | LZ CLS sxh | Geon Frog TKL | Hiney TKL One | Geon Glare TKL



"Everything is worse, but in a barely perceptible and indefinable way" -dollartacos, after I came back from a break | "Is Linkshine our Nixon?" -NAV | "Puddsy is the Puddsy of keebs" -ns90

Offline inanis

  • Truly Literally The Cloud
  • * Destiny Supporter
  • Posts: 790
  • Location: Dark Places
    • SEALWoodworking
Re: KUL or CODE for cherry mx clear?
« Reply #8 on: Thu, 17 July 2014, 15:47:35 »
But cherry stabs make it SO MUCH EASIER to change keycaps

+1 for the ease of use with the Cherry stabilizers. The stock keycaps on the CODE are very meh, and swapping them out with the Costar stabs was frustrating at times.
Some hearts are gallows, I'm not here for hangin' around

Offline jalaj

  • Posts: 156
Re: KUL or CODE for cherry mx clear?
« Reply #9 on: Thu, 17 July 2014, 16:06:52 »
The Leopold FC660M also has an option for clears. It's a 66% KB with dedicated arrows.

Offline SpAmRaY

  • NOT a Moderator
  • * Certified Spammer
  • Posts: 14667
  • Location: ¯\(°_o)/¯
  • because reasons.......
Re: KUL or CODE for cherry mx clear?
« Reply #10 on: Thu, 17 July 2014, 16:07:56 »
The Leopold FC660M also has an option for clears. It's a 66% KB with dedicated arrows.

Yes that's a very good keyboard as well. There are also keycool 84's out there with clears if you can find them.

Offline cribbit

  • Posts: 288
Re: KUL or CODE for cherry mx clear?
« Reply #11 on: Thu, 17 July 2014, 16:16:48 »
You barely missed getting a spare FC660M with clears off massdrop's July clearance sale.

Luckily, I missed it too, or my wallet would be crying. And thankfully the other boards for sale were all blues or reds.
I typed this post on my Slanck. I also developed a stronger, cleaner, easier handwiring method.


Offline petereps

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 4
  • Location: USA
Re: KUL or CODE for cherry mx clear?
« Reply #12 on: Thu, 17 July 2014, 21:00:38 »
The Leopold FC660M also has an option for clears. It's a 66% KB with dedicated arrows.

Yes that's a very good keyboard as well. There are also keycool 84's out there with clears if you can find them.

Yea I just found out that this existed. Definitely going with this option, basically my perfect keyboard as far as switches, color, and layout. Thanks everyone!

Offline Oobly

  • * Esteemed Elder
  • Posts: 3929
  • Location: Finland
Buying more keycaps,
it really hacks my wallet,
but I must have them.

Offline TBone

  • Posts: 216
Re: KUL or CODE for cherry mx clear?
« Reply #14 on: Fri, 18 July 2014, 09:50:12 »
I did the Cherry Stabilizer Mod to my KUL and I think that clipped Cherry stabs are better than Costar every day of the week. I never want to deal with Costar stabs again. Although that voids the warranty...  :(

Offline dante

  • Posts: 2553
Re: KUL or CODE for cherry mx clear?
« Reply #15 on: Fri, 18 July 2014, 09:51:05 »
I did the Cherry Stabilizer Mod to my KUL and I think that clipped Cherry stabs are better than Costar every day of the week. I never want to deal with Costar stabs again. Although that voids the warranty...  :(

You - and everyone who has done this mod - should forward your research to KUL.  Maybe they will consider it and make it a standard feature.

Offline bazh

  • * Exquisite Elder
  • Posts: 970
  • Location: Finland
Re: KUL or CODE for cherry mx clear?
« Reply #16 on: Fri, 18 July 2014, 10:02:55 »
One has cherry stabilizers one has costar... so that may factor into your decision?

Costar win.. 100%.. it's smoother, less sensitive to key cap warp induced stroke imbalance,

AND easy to fix / retune....  if something is out of place..

cherry stab, much harder to work with..

:* :*


btw, what is KUL? :(
HHKB Pro2 white

Newbie again

Offline SpAmRaY

  • NOT a Moderator
  • * Certified Spammer
  • Posts: 14667
  • Location: ¯\(°_o)/¯
  • because reasons.......
Re: KUL or CODE for cherry mx clear?
« Reply #17 on: Fri, 18 July 2014, 10:10:53 »
One has cherry stabilizers one has costar... so that may factor into your decision?

Costar win.. 100%.. it's smoother, less sensitive to key cap warp induced stroke imbalance,

AND easy to fix / retune....  if something is out of place..

cherry stab, much harder to work with..

:* :*


btw, what is KUL? :(

new keyboard manufacturer http://www.keyeduplabs.com/es-87.html

Offline digi

  • elite af tbh
  • * Exquisite Elder
  • Posts: 2789
  • keyboard game on fleek
Re: KUL or CODE for cherry mx clear?
« Reply #18 on: Fri, 18 July 2014, 10:12:08 »
I would choose the KUL it has the pcb mount stabs, the WASD uses cherry stabs, I've had both. They're both very good boards tho.

Offline strict

  • TKL Zealot
  • Posts: 1921
  • Location: PA
Re: KUL or CODE for cherry mx clear?
« Reply #19 on: Fri, 18 July 2014, 10:32:14 »
I would choose the KUL it has the pcb mount stabs, the WASD uses cherry stabs, I've had both. They're both very good boards tho.

I'm pretty sure KUL is Cherry plate mounted and WASD is Costar plate mounted.

Realforce EK45 (Silenced)  |  Realforce 87UW (45g)  |  Realforce 87UWS (Variable)
Filco MJ2 TKL (Cherry Clears)  |  Phantom 87 (78g Gateron Clears)  |  Phantom 86 (67g Zealios)


Offline TBone

  • Posts: 216
Re: KUL or CODE for cherry mx clear?
« Reply #20 on: Fri, 18 July 2014, 10:34:55 »
I would choose the KUL it has the pcb mount stabs, the WASD uses cherry stabs, I've had both. They're both very good boards tho.

Why do you say it has PCB mounted stabs? This is the second place you have stated this without backing it up.

 I just took it apart and did the mod (where I clipped the stabs) and I'm certain they are plate mounted...unless I'm totally wrong. I mean they are attatched to the plate...not the PCB. You have to desolder to remove the stabs. PCB mount you don't (unless I'm a total noob and wrong) :p

EDIT: Nevermind didn't see your response  :thumb:

Offline digi

  • elite af tbh
  • * Exquisite Elder
  • Posts: 2789
  • keyboard game on fleek
Re: KUL or CODE for cherry mx clear?
« Reply #21 on: Fri, 18 July 2014, 10:34:56 »
I would choose the KUL it has the pcb mount stabs, the WASD uses cherry stabs, I've had both. They're both very good boards tho.

I'm pretty sure KUL is Cherry plate mounted and WASD is Costar plate mounted.

you're right, sorry, but I'd take the cherry plate stabs over the costar plate mount stabs any day. :)

Offline SpAmRaY

  • NOT a Moderator
  • * Certified Spammer
  • Posts: 14667
  • Location: ¯\(°_o)/¯
  • because reasons.......
Re: KUL or CODE for cherry mx clear?
« Reply #22 on: Fri, 18 July 2014, 10:35:11 »
I would choose the KUL it has the pcb mount stabs, the WASD uses cherry stabs, I've had both. They're both very good boards tho.

I'm pretty sure KUL is Cherry plate mounted and WASD is Costar plate mounted.

Yep you can see the KUL pics here http://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=59116.0, definitely plate mounted cherry stabs

Offline ajx

  • Posts: 391
Re: KUL or CODE for cherry mx clear?
« Reply #23 on: Fri, 18 July 2014, 12:33:28 »
I have two CODEs with Clears. Both feel solid and well built. I have not used the KUL so I can't compare it against that. One negative thing about the CODE is the amount of ping it produces. It really annoyed me at first, but then I got used to it and now I only notice if I'm listening for it. Some of the ping issue is probably my fault though, I tend to really hammer the keys so I'm sure the amount of force I'm using is making that situation worse. All in all, I really like it. I bought a second to match my first so that has to be a good sign.
Ping issue? what does it means actually?


Offline Flyersfan1

  • * Destiny Supporter
  • Posts: 1209
  • Location: Philadelphia
  • Hi!
Re: KUL or CODE for cherry mx clear?
« Reply #24 on: Fri, 18 July 2014, 12:43:40 »
I have two CODEs with Clears. Both feel solid and well built. I have not used the KUL so I can't compare it against that. One negative thing about the CODE is the amount of ping it produces. It really annoyed me at first, but then I got used to it and now I only notice if I'm listening for it. Some of the ping issue is probably my fault though, I tend to really hammer the keys so I'm sure the amount of force I'm using is making that situation worse. All in all, I really like it. I bought a second to match my first so that has to be a good sign.
Ping issue? what does it means actually?
Courtesy of GH user daerid:
Quote from: Photekq
i know people who think salt is spicy

Offline oscillik

  • Posts: 411
  • Location: England
    • music podcasts
Re: KUL or CODE for cherry mx clear?
« Reply #25 on: Fri, 18 July 2014, 12:48:47 »
I have two CODEs with Clears. Both feel solid and well built. I have not used the KUL so I can't compare it against that. One negative thing about the CODE is the amount of ping it produces. It really annoyed me at first, but then I got used to it and now I only notice if I'm listening for it. Some of the ping issue is probably my fault though, I tend to really hammer the keys so I'm sure the amount of force I'm using is making that situation worse. All in all, I really like it. I bought a second to match my first so that has to be a good sign.
Ping issue? what does it means actually?
Courtesy of GH user daerid:

WASD has already confirmed on geekhack that the ping issue is due to the springs resonating.
Keymacs A620N-Rev.A with Alps SKCM Salmon switches

Offline Heezy

  • Formerly trynds
  • Posts: 206
  • Location: M'sia & OZOZOZOIOIOI
  • ★★★★★
Re: KUL or CODE for cherry mx clear?
« Reply #26 on: Fri, 18 July 2014, 13:00:01 »
Wow the ping sounds horrible, I had a slight ping on my shift and enter, but I put orings on those.

I have two CODEs with Clears. Both feel solid and well built. I have not used the KUL so I can't compare it against that. One negative thing about the CODE is the amount of ping it produces. It really annoyed me at first, but then I got used to it and now I only notice if I'm listening for it. Some of the ping issue is probably my fault though, I tend to really hammer the keys so I'm sure the amount of force I'm using is making that situation worse. All in all, I really like it. I bought a second to match my first so that has to be a good sign.
Ping issue? what does it means actually?
Courtesy of GH user daerid:

Rig - i3 6300, 240GB SSD, 500GB SSD, Gigabyte H170N Wifi, 16GB DDR4, Zotac 1060 Mini, 650w SuperFlower
Monitor - HKC144hz Mouse/Mousepad/Keyboard - Zowie EC1A - Zowie GS-R - Zowie Camade - Filco TKL MX Pink