Author Topic: Would you join a ride with a Titanic replica?  (Read 4867 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Olumin

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 209
  • Location: "...that famous Texas part of Hamburg"
  • "Guy walks into a doctor's office..."
Would you join a ride with a Titanic replica?
« on: Sun, 29 May 2016, 14:56:43 »
We talking about a 1:1 replica, including interior, steam engines, riveted hull, old-style materials and manufacturing methods as well as a authentic bridge and navigation methods. No modern technology, not even for navigation or communication. Real people down there in the ship shovelling coals. No smartphones and laptops allowed, no modern electronic technology in general during the trip. Also no WiFi or signal with phones, now think about that. You couldn't even charge your devices. Ship would take the exact same route then the original titanic did 104 years ago, from Southampton to new york. The daily routine on the ship would also be the same as on the original, 100% authentic. You would need to wear appropriate, authentic clothing, respectively to 1912. Only exceptions are things like glasses or equipment you need for medical purposes. If you want to take photos to show your family and friends, tough ****, not digital.

This ship would in no way match modern safety and fire hazard standards. Only thing different is that there would be enough life boats. But keep in mind we are still talking about 1:1 replicas of the original life boats here.

So what do you say, sounds good?
If you wouldn't join, would you if the ship was called Olympic instead of Titanic (Titanic's sister ship, which didn't sank)? Only the name would change, nothing else about the ship itself.

« Last Edit: Sun, 29 May 2016, 14:59:00 by Olumin »

Offline tp4tissue

  • * Destiny Supporter
  • Posts: 13720
  • Location: Official Geekhack Public Defender..
  • OmniExpert of: Rice, Top-Ramen, Ergodox, n Females
Re: Would you join a ride with a Titanic replica?
« Reply #1 on: Sun, 29 May 2016, 15:14:17 »
I've been on a few cruises already..  Tp4 honestly prefers just staying home with his Ghetto-Fios..

Offline chyros

  • a.k.a. Thomas
  • * Esteemed Elder
  • Posts: 3499
  • Location: The Netherlands
  • Hello and welcome.
Re: Would you join a ride with a Titanic replica?
« Reply #2 on: Sun, 29 May 2016, 18:45:57 »
Possibly. I wouldn't have to travel very far to ride it xD . Besides, you can bet the precautions would be up the arse to prevent the same thing happening.

Apparently the Titanic isn't even big compared to today's large cruise ships.
Check my keyboard video reviews:


Offline Olumin

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 209
  • Location: "...that famous Texas part of Hamburg"
  • "Guy walks into a doctor's office..."
Re: Would you join a ride with a Titanic replica?
« Reply #3 on: Sun, 29 May 2016, 18:55:41 »
Possibly. I wouldn't have to travel very far to ride it xD . Besides, you can bet the precautions would be up the arse to prevent the same thing happening.

Apparently the Titanic isn't even big compared to today's large cruise ships.

That's true, it might have been the longest ship at the time (together with the Olympic), but it lost that title fairly quickly. The Titanic was 269 meters long, a more modern liner like the queen mary 2 is already about 345 meters long. The biggest cruise ship to date is the Harmony of the Seas, whish is 362 m long.


Offline Sifo

  • Alter
  • * Exquisite Elder
  • Posts: 7504
  • Location: #GOLDSPRINGS, #LEGITBALLIN
  • Illustrious
Re: Would you join a ride with a Titanic replica?
« Reply #4 on: Sun, 29 May 2016, 19:56:20 »
no i wouldn't cuz then we'd sink
I love Elzy

Offline Olumin

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 209
  • Location: "...that famous Texas part of Hamburg"
  • "Guy walks into a doctor's office..."
Re: Would you join a ride with a Titanic replica?
« Reply #5 on: Sun, 29 May 2016, 20:58:03 »
no i wouldn't cuz then we'd sink

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Offline Sifo

  • Alter
  • * Exquisite Elder
  • Posts: 7504
  • Location: #GOLDSPRINGS, #LEGITBALLIN
  • Illustrious
Re: Would you join a ride with a Titanic replica?
« Reply #6 on: Sun, 29 May 2016, 21:03:15 »
it's not an authentic replica experience if 1500 people don't die
I love Elzy

Offline FrostyToast

  • Litshoard
  • * Exquisite Elder
  • Posts: 2368
  • Location: Canada
Re: Would you join a ride with a Titanic replica?
« Reply #7 on: Sun, 29 May 2016, 21:03:18 »
Only if there was a replica iceberg.
Gotta be authentic or it's just a rip-off.
Quote from: elton5354
I don't need anymore keyboards

Offline Olumin

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 209
  • Location: "...that famous Texas part of Hamburg"
  • "Guy walks into a doctor's office..."
Re: Would you join a ride with a Titanic replica?
« Reply #8 on: Sun, 29 May 2016, 21:32:28 »
Only if there was a replica iceberg.
Gotta be authentic or it's just a rip-off.

There will be a holographic one, for show and reenactment. But only on its maiden voyage. No one except a few crew members will know that its not a real one. There will be a simulation of the ship hitting it (simulated bump), and a authentic reenactment on the crew member's side of the routine that happened that night. The ship will not actually sink. A few people will get evacuated in the lifeboats, but these will turn around after a while and return to the ship. This process will also cover the mandatory safety practice in case of emergency.

That all also fits very well into the routine which happened on the actual titanic that night, since at the beginning of it sinking the crew members told the passengers that this is only for practice (to prevent panic), most people as well as crew members didn't believed that the ship would actually sink, the passengers where told that they will be back on the ship by sunrise.
« Last Edit: Sun, 29 May 2016, 21:39:06 by Olumin »

Offline Olumin

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 209
  • Location: "...that famous Texas part of Hamburg"
  • "Guy walks into a doctor's office..."
Re: Would you join a ride with a Titanic replica?
« Reply #9 on: Sun, 29 May 2016, 21:51:55 »
it's not an authentic replica experience if 1500 people don't die

Next up I'll be sure to rebuild the WTC and blow it up again, makes for an authentic experience, and great firework.
« Last Edit: Sun, 29 May 2016, 21:54:00 by Olumin »

Offline MOZ

  • KING OF THE NEWBIES
  • * Maker
  • Posts: 3981
  • Location: Jo'burg
  • Busy making stuff
Re: Would you join a ride with a Titanic replica?
« Reply #10 on: Mon, 30 May 2016, 01:33:00 »
whatcha smoking son?

Offline Leslieann

  • * Elevated Elder
  • Posts: 4566
Re: Would you join a ride with a Titanic replica?
« Reply #11 on: Mon, 30 May 2016, 02:05:11 »
The original had bad metals, but even then, had they slowed down, and the watch had the binoculars like they should have, they wouldn't have sunk. It was multiple failures that sank it.

Would I ride a new one, not for longer than a day or two.
Ignoring safety and even if it stayed south, doesn't matter. How many days could you stay on it before you were bored out of your mind. Not to mention the health risks, how many of those boats have come back with an entire boat load of people with an illness? This doesn't apply just to a Titanic replica, but any cruise. Oh, and don't forget, riding Titanic sucked if you weren't in first class.

Think of it this way, you have a week to go to Hawaii. You can take the slow cruise ship leaving you 2 days to take it in (then fly home) or you can fly there, and spend 6 days in Hawaii. I'm flying. I can take a fishing boat out while there if I want.
Novelkeys NK65AE w/62g Zilents/39g springs
More
62g Zilents/lubed/Novelkeys 39g springs, HK Gaming Thick PBT caps, Netdot Gen10 magnetic cable, pic
| Filco MJ2 L.E. Vortex Case, Jailhouse Blues, heavily customized
More
Vortex case squared up/blasted finish removed/custom feet/paint/winkey blockoff plate, HID Liberator, stainless steel universal plate, 3d printed adapters, Type C, Netdot Gen10 magnetic cable, foam sound dampened, HK Gaming Thick PBT caps (o-ringed), Cherry Jailhouse Blues w/lubed/clipped Cherry light springs, 40g actuation
| GMMK TKL
More
w/ Kailh Purple Pros/lubed/Novelkeys 39g springs, HK Gaming Thick PBT caps, Netdot Gen10 Magnetic cable
| PF65 3d printed 65% w/LCD and hot swap
More
Box Jades, Interchangeable trim, mini lcd, QMK, underglow, HK Gaming Thick PBT caps, O-rings, Netdot Gen10 magnetic cable, in progress link
| Magicforce 68
More
MF68 pcb, Outemu Blues, in progress
| YMDK75 Jail Housed Gateron Blues
More
J-spacers, YMDK Thick PBT, O-rings, SIP sockets
| KBT Race S L.E.
More
Ergo Clears, custom WASD caps
| Das Pro
More
Costar model with browns
| GH60
More
Cherry Blacks, custom 3d printed case
| Logitech Illumininated | IBM Model M (x2)
Definitive Omron Guide. | 3d printed Keyboard FAQ/Discussion

Offline Olumin

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 209
  • Location: "...that famous Texas part of Hamburg"
  • "Guy walks into a doctor's office..."
Re: Would you join a ride with a Titanic replica?
« Reply #12 on: Mon, 30 May 2016, 07:36:21 »
The original had bad metals, but even then, had they slowed down, and the watch had the binoculars like they should have, they wouldn't have sunk. It was multiple failures that sank it.

Would I ride a new one, not for longer than a day or two.
Ignoring safety and even if it stayed south, doesn't matter. How many days could you stay on it before you were bored out of your mind. Not to mention the health risks, how many of those boats have come back with an entire boat load of people with an illness? This doesn't apply just to a Titanic replica, but any cruise. Oh, and don't forget, riding Titanic sucked if you weren't in first class.

Think of it this way, you have a week to go to Hawaii. You can take the slow cruise ship leaving you 2 days to take it in (then fly home) or you can fly there, and spend 6 days in Hawaii. I'm flying. I can take a fishing boat out while there if I want.

That's not the point, the entire point is reenactment. This ship isn't supposed to offer the same comfort and security as modern cruise ships, because it's not a cruise ship in the first place. It is a 104 year old steam Ocean liner, and with it's 21 knots its still on par with most modern cruise ships and liners. The Point of this is not security, its the magic behind such thing, and there cannot be magic when there is security. Do you know why there weren't enough life boats in the first place? The number of life boats was very much sufficing in compliance with maritime safety regulations of the time, since the amount of lifeboats was not determinate by the number of passengers, but the weight of the ship (they had been intended to regulate vessels of only up to 10,000 tons). Back in its day these regulation where not "updated" to apply to ships of these dimensions and weight, therefore the Titanic carried even more lifeboats then necessary. The titanic was not an exception, most ships over 10.000 tons whish where in a similar situation did not carry enough lifeboats, some of them even less for 40% of the passengers, so In reality, the given capacity was quite nominal. Titanic had actually been designed to accommodate up to 64 boats, but because of complacency by the White Star Line, they wanted to provide a better view from the deck and give the ship a better look from the outside.

Also the titanic did not use "bad metals', is was build of "thousands of one inch-thick mild steel plates and two million steel and wrought iron rivets and equipped with the latest technology at the time." 

"However, slow bend testing, a more likely applicable strain rate, of four hull plate samples showed average toughness of 55 MPa-m1/2 at 0°C, quite reasonable for this application."

From: http://www.materialstoday.com/metals-alloys/news/what-really-sank-the-titanic/
Even if the rivets where bad, this was more then unlikely the cause if it sinking.And keep in mind we are still talking about tests with 100 year old parts of metal from the bottom of the ocean.

(Some of this I looked up on Wikipedia for details)
« Last Edit: Mon, 30 May 2016, 07:55:11 by Olumin »

Offline Olumin

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 209
  • Location: "...that famous Texas part of Hamburg"
  • "Guy walks into a doctor's office..."
Re: Would you join a ride with a Titanic replica?
« Reply #13 on: Mon, 30 May 2016, 10:19:00 »
whatcha smoking son?

Asked the one wearing a pink bunny body-suit.

Offline MOZ

  • KING OF THE NEWBIES
  • * Maker
  • Posts: 3981
  • Location: Jo'burg
  • Busy making stuff
Re: Would you join a ride with a Titanic replica?
« Reply #14 on: Mon, 30 May 2016, 10:34:38 »
whatcha smoking son?

Asked the one wearing a pink bunny body-suit.

Have you not seen the best Christmas movie ever?

Offline Badwrench

  • * Destiny Supporter
  • Posts: 1986
  • Location: So. Cal.
  • ummmm.....I forgot
Re: Would you join a ride with a Titanic replica?
« Reply #15 on: Mon, 30 May 2016, 11:13:22 »
I would love to go on this!  Just to experience what an engineering marvel it was when it was built would be amazing. 


whatcha smoking son?

Asked the one wearing a pink bunny body-suit.

Have you not seen the best Christmas movie ever?

How have you not seen this?  I double dog dare you to see it!
wut. i'd buy a ****ty IBM board for that green V2

Offline Olumin

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 209
  • Location: "...that famous Texas part of Hamburg"
  • "Guy walks into a doctor's office..."
Re: Would you join a ride with a Titanic replica?
« Reply #16 on: Mon, 30 May 2016, 11:22:43 »
whatcha smoking son?

Asked the one wearing a pink bunny body-suit.

Have you not seen the best Christmas movie ever?

I don think so, I'm not so much into Christmas, don't watch TV any more, and I'm also German, perhaps the movie is not a thing over here.

Offline Leslieann

  • * Elevated Elder
  • Posts: 4566
Re: Would you join a ride with a Titanic replica?
« Reply #17 on: Mon, 30 May 2016, 16:13:25 »
That's not the point, the entire point is reenactment. This ship isn't supposed to offer the same comfort and security as modern cruise ships, because it's not a cruise ship in the first place.
Soooo, even less to do then, yeah, no thanks.

Comfort and security on a modern ship... Have you not seen how many ships have limped back to port with a full load of passengers sick from something that spread throughout the boat? The last one, the passengers shut down the toilet system as well. You won't get me on a modern ship today, probably come back with Zika or something.

Oh, and as for modern being safer..
In ship design you have a choice, less wobbly (less seasickness) but unable to recover, or more tippy (more seasickness), but able to right itself.  Care to guess what new cruise ships use? One good rogue wave, and a modern ship will be on it's side in 2 seconds flat. As they make bigger and more stable ships, the odds actually increase of this happening.

The Point of this is not security, its the magic behind such thing, and there cannot be magic when there is security. Do you know why there weren't enough life boats in the first place? The number of life boats was very much sufficing in compliance with maritime safety regulations of the time, since the amount of lifeboats was not determinate by the number of passengers, but the weight of the ship (they had been intended to regulate vessels of only up to 10,000 tons).
Magic?
Above deck was glamorous, below deck was a normal ship of the day.

Unless you had a first class cabin, you were below deck (think 1 star hotel, worse for steerage class), which is far from magic. Only the wealthy were up on deck and in the ball room. It's not a modern cruise ship where everyone dines in the dining room with the captain, even in the movie, Jack only dines up there because he snuck up there (which would have been difficult or impossible). Worse though, when they hit the iceberg, the crew locked the stairwells down to the lower decks so that the lower classes would stay below and remained that way so that the wealthy could get the lifeboats. Most of the people who died never even managed to get up on the deck despite plenty of time to do so.

Be careful glamorizing the past as it's usually only the tales of the wealthy that get told.

Also the titanic did not use "bad metals', is was build of "thousands of one inch-thick mild steel plates and two million steel and wrought iron rivets and equipped with the latest technology at the time."

"However, slow bend testing, a more likely applicable strain rate, of four hull plate samples showed average toughness of 55 MPa-m1/2 at 0°C, quite reasonable for this application."

From: http://www.materialstoday.com/metals-alloys/news/what-really-sank-the-titanic/
Even if the rivets where bad, this was more then unlikely the cause if it sinking.And keep in mind we are still talking about tests with 100 year old parts of metal from the bottom of the ocean.
Like every major disaster it's almost always a series of events or failures, in Titanic... The life boats are well known.

Less known is that the binoculars for the watch who were looking for icebergs were locked in a locker, the only person with keys was left behind in England due to a last minute crew change. Without binoculars, they couldn't spot the iceberg soon enough. They were repeatedly warned of icebergs in the area, and despite no binoculars they sped on and at those speeds, they never had a chance to avoid it. They were so arrogant, they turned off the radio after getting annoyed by all of the iceberg warnings.

Titanic would probably have survived had White Star used the original design, it was almost unsinkable, it's how modern ships are designed today. The designer had the right idea, he was just too far ahead of his time for them to understand it (White Star was also almost broke). White Star had trimmed the bulkheads down to save costs, this was what allowed water to spill over from one compartment into another, ultimately sinking the ship.  Had they remained full height, the ship probably would not have sunk, but even if it had, it would have taken much, much longer. Not only would nearby ships have reached them in time, but more than likely it would have made it back to port on it's own.

Going back to the metal, the metal for the rivets was not great, even for the time. However, a hull is under compression, so no, the metal didn't sink it. Had they not hit the iceberg, the hull would have survived for decades, as proven by the Olympic. However, when the hull was hit, it did allow it to open a larger gash than it should have. Causing a faster sink rate, and water to go over the bulkheads. The rivets played a role in the sinking, but they didn't sink it.

Change anything in that chain of events and Titanic would have survived.
Binoculars or simply slowing down would have allowed them to avoid the iceberg, or at least lessen the damage.
Better metals would have reduced the sink rate and damage.
Proper design would have slowed or eliminated the sinking.
A better trained crew could have gotten more people into the life boats.
More lifeboats would have saved more people.

The whole thing was a sh*t show from start to finish.
Novelkeys NK65AE w/62g Zilents/39g springs
More
62g Zilents/lubed/Novelkeys 39g springs, HK Gaming Thick PBT caps, Netdot Gen10 magnetic cable, pic
| Filco MJ2 L.E. Vortex Case, Jailhouse Blues, heavily customized
More
Vortex case squared up/blasted finish removed/custom feet/paint/winkey blockoff plate, HID Liberator, stainless steel universal plate, 3d printed adapters, Type C, Netdot Gen10 magnetic cable, foam sound dampened, HK Gaming Thick PBT caps (o-ringed), Cherry Jailhouse Blues w/lubed/clipped Cherry light springs, 40g actuation
| GMMK TKL
More
w/ Kailh Purple Pros/lubed/Novelkeys 39g springs, HK Gaming Thick PBT caps, Netdot Gen10 Magnetic cable
| PF65 3d printed 65% w/LCD and hot swap
More
Box Jades, Interchangeable trim, mini lcd, QMK, underglow, HK Gaming Thick PBT caps, O-rings, Netdot Gen10 magnetic cable, in progress link
| Magicforce 68
More
MF68 pcb, Outemu Blues, in progress
| YMDK75 Jail Housed Gateron Blues
More
J-spacers, YMDK Thick PBT, O-rings, SIP sockets
| KBT Race S L.E.
More
Ergo Clears, custom WASD caps
| Das Pro
More
Costar model with browns
| GH60
More
Cherry Blacks, custom 3d printed case
| Logitech Illumininated | IBM Model M (x2)
Definitive Omron Guide. | 3d printed Keyboard FAQ/Discussion

Offline Olumin

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 209
  • Location: "...that famous Texas part of Hamburg"
  • "Guy walks into a doctor's office..."
Re: Would you join a ride with a Titanic replica?
« Reply #18 on: Mon, 30 May 2016, 16:47:51 »
That's not the point, the entire point is reenactment. This ship isn't supposed to offer the same comfort and security as modern cruise ships, because it's not a cruise ship in the first place.
Soooo, even less to do then, yeah, no thanks.

Comfort and security on a modern ship... Have you not seen how many ships have limped back to port with a full load of passengers sick from something that spread throughout the boat? The last one, the passengers shut down the toilet system as well. You won't get me on a modern ship today, probably come back with Zika or something.

Oh, and as for modern being safer..
In ship design you have a choice, less wobbly (less seasickness) but unable to recover, or more tippy (more seasickness), but able to right itself.  Care to guess what new cruise ships use? One good rogue wave, and a modern ship will be on it's side in 2 seconds flat. As they make bigger and more stable ships, the odds actually increase of this happening.

The Point of this is not security, its the magic behind such thing, and there cannot be magic when there is security. Do you know why there weren't enough life boats in the first place? The number of life boats was very much sufficing in compliance with maritime safety regulations of the time, since the amount of lifeboats was not determinate by the number of passengers, but the weight of the ship (they had been intended to regulate vessels of only up to 10,000 tons).
Magic?
Above deck was glamorous, below deck was a normal ship of the day.

Unless you had a first class cabin, you were below deck (think 1 star hotel, worse for steerage class), which is far from magic. Only the wealthy were up on deck and in the ball room. It's not a modern cruise ship where everyone dines in the dining room with the captain, even in the movie, Jack only dines up there because he snuck up there (which would have been difficult or impossible). Worse though, when they hit the iceberg, the crew locked the stairwells down to the lower decks so that the lower classes would stay below and remained that way so that the wealthy could get the lifeboats. Most of the people who died never even managed to get up on the deck despite plenty of time to do so.

Be careful glamorizing the past as it's usually only the tales of the wealthy that get told.

Also the titanic did not use "bad metals', is was build of "thousands of one inch-thick mild steel plates and two million steel and wrought iron rivets and equipped with the latest technology at the time."

"However, slow bend testing, a more likely applicable strain rate, of four hull plate samples showed average toughness of 55 MPa-m1/2 at 0°C, quite reasonable for this application."

From: http://www.materialstoday.com/metals-alloys/news/what-really-sank-the-titanic/
Even if the rivets where bad, this was more then unlikely the cause if it sinking.And keep in mind we are still talking about tests with 100 year old parts of metal from the bottom of the ocean.
Like every major disaster it's almost always a series of events or failures, in Titanic... The life boats are well known.

Less known is that the binoculars for the watch who were looking for icebergs were locked in a locker, the only person with keys was left behind in England due to a last minute crew change. Without binoculars, they couldn't spot the iceberg soon enough. They were repeatedly warned of icebergs in the area, and despite no binoculars they sped on and at those speeds, they never had a chance to avoid it. They were so arrogant, they turned off the radio after getting annoyed by all of the iceberg warnings.

Titanic would probably have survived had White Star used the original design, it was almost unsinkable, it's how modern ships are designed today. The designer had the right idea, he was just too far ahead of his time for them to understand it (White Star was also almost broke). White Star had trimmed the bulkheads down to save costs, this was what allowed water to spill over from one compartment into another, ultimately sinking the ship.  Had they remained full height, the ship probably would not have sunk, but even if it had, it would have taken much, much longer. Not only would nearby ships have reached them in time, but more than likely it would have made it back to port on it's own.

Going back to the metal, the metal for the rivets was not great, even for the time. However, a hull is under compression, so no, the metal didn't sink it. Had they not hit the iceberg, the hull would have survived for decades, as proven by the Olympic. However, when the hull was hit, it did allow it to open a larger gash than it should have. Causing a faster sink rate, and water to go over the bulkheads. The rivets played a role in the sinking, but they didn't sink it.

Change anything in that chain of events and Titanic would have survived.
Binoculars or simply slowing down would have allowed them to avoid the iceberg, or at least lessen the damage.
Better metals would have reduced the sink rate and damage.
Proper design would have slowed or eliminated the sinking.
A better trained crew could have gotten more people into the life boats.
More lifeboats would have saved more people.

The whole thing was a sh*t show from start to finish.

I am not saying that what you claim is wrong, but I will say that you didn't really understood what I meant. With magic I mean the experience, not that the entire ships is pure luxury and comfort, but this is what its all about. Its the same with using old tech like a typewriter or a manual camera, you don't do this because its "better", more efficient or because it gives you better results at the end, you are doing it because you are enjoying the process and way of doing it. This is all for providing an authentic experience, and many peole will only do this once in their life, but for this one time it will be fascinating, regardless of if you are 1st or 3rd class, because that's what you came here to do in the first place, to experience that, and you know what to expect, its part of it. I am well aware of all what you mentioned, but this is not about discussing what could have been done better, because it don't change anything, it happened over 100 years ago. Its not about safety, its about the experience, its the same reason you visit a old castle or drive old cars, even though you could slip and fall down a brittle wall or your car could fail on the middle of the highway.

Water flowing over the bulkheads is unlikely to have caused a significant speed-up in sinking, that is more of a myth. The bulkheads where very much properly designed. Before the water could " flow over the bulkheads" it would first flow in the opposite direction (the direction of the ship's bow) because of the angle. It wouldn't flow over the bulkheads until the entire bow would be full of water. And keep in mind that the bulkheads are not just giant high walls whish are open at the top (where water could simply flow over them), they are separated by the deck's floors.

Safety and comfort is rarely compatible, its always a compromise, that is especially true with passenger ships like ocean liners and cruise ships. Increasing the safety of the ship means taking away from the comfort provided to the passengers, you WILL have to make a compromise, that starts with things like using bulkheads in the first place. I don't think the white star line made a poor design decision there. Back then comfort and luxury where more important then safety relations, it was the way of thinking. It changed, nowadays we have too much safety and not enough freedom, and it will change again in the future.
« Last Edit: Mon, 30 May 2016, 17:48:32 by Olumin »

Offline noisyturtle

  • * Exalted Elder
  • Posts: 6497
  • comfortably numb
Re: Would you join a ride with a Titanic replica?
« Reply #19 on: Mon, 30 May 2016, 18:38:14 »
Didn't they do an American Dad episode about this?

Offline Leslieann

  • * Elevated Elder
  • Posts: 4566
Re: Would you join a ride with a Titanic replica?
« Reply #20 on: Tue, 31 May 2016, 01:21:20 »
I am not saying that what you claim is wrong, but I will say that you didn't really understood what I meant. With magic I mean the experience, not that the entire ships is pure luxury and comfort, but this is what its all about. Its the same with using old tech like a typewriter or a manual camera, you don't do this because its "better", more efficient or because it gives you better results at the end, you are doing it because you are enjoying the process and way of doing it. This is all for providing an authentic experience, and many peole will only do this once in their life, but for this one time it will be fascinating, regardless of if you are 1st or 3rd class, because that's what you came here to do in the first place, to experience that, and you know what to expect, its part of it. I am well aware of all what you mentioned, but this is not about discussing what could have been done better, because it don't change anything, it happened over 100 years ago. Its not about safety, its about the experience, its the same reason you visit a old castle or drive old cars, even though you could slip and fall down a brittle wall or your car could fail on the middle of the highway.

Water flowing over the bulkheads is unlikely to have caused a significant speed-up in sinking, that is more of a myth. The bulkheads where very much properly designed. Before the water could " flow over the bulkheads" it would first flow in the opposite direction (the direction of the ship's bow) because of the angle. It wouldn't flow over the bulkheads until the entire bow would be full of water. And keep in mind that the bulkheads are not just giant high walls whish are open at the top (where water could simply flow over them), they are separated by the deck's floors.

Safety and comfort is rarely compatible, its always a compromise, that is especially true with passenger ships like ocean liners and cruise ships. Increasing the safety of the ship means taking away from the comfort provided to the passengers, you WILL have to make a compromise, that starts with things like using bulkheads in the first place. I don't think the white star line made a poor design decision there. Back then comfort and luxury where more important then safety relations, it was the way of thinking. It changed, nowadays we have too much safety and not enough freedom, and it will change again in the future.
I can (and have) visited the Queen Mary, I didn't have to be stuck on it for a week to get an idea of how things were or what it was like.  Would I tour a Titanic clone, yes, I would even love to do a ballroom dance there, but would I go on a 7 day cruise? Absolutely not. Even if it was first class. Even as opulent as first class was, ignoring the safety issues, health issues and more... It's 7 days on a ship with little to do. That's not my idea of  a good time.

The experience, blah blah blah... If you want to be stuck in a room half the size of your bedroom with 5 people for a week, with little access to showers, be my guest.  I don't need that experience, I've ridden Greyhound before.


Water flowing over the bulkheads is unlikely to have caused a significant speed-up in sinking, that is more of a myth. The bulkheads where very much properly designed. Before the water could " flow over the bulkheads" it would first flow in the opposite direction (the direction of the ship's bow) because of the angle. It wouldn't flow over the bulkheads until the entire bow would be full of water. And keep in mind that the bulkheads are not just giant high walls whish are open at the top (where water could simply flow over them), they are separated by the deck's floors.

You are correct bulkheads are not just high walls, it's supposed to create a sealed compartment, and they were designed properly. They were supposed to reach the top deck creating a sealed compartment. White Star didn't do that, effectively just making them walls. A normal deck will not seal it in any way shape or form.  So while they were designed properly, White Star clipped them.

And yes, I know the theory of the bulkhead failing, it doesn't change anything, which is probably why historians ignore it.
A failed bulkhead may have ultimately doomed Titanic, but it didn't have to doom the passengers. Proper bulkheads would have allowed it to remain afloat for hours, possibly days. Had that been the case, Titanic would be a tiny footnote in history. There are quite a few Titanic theories , including the idea that it was actually the Olympic that sank, almost all go back to White Star being in financial trouble.

Titanic's sister ship H.M.S. Britannic also went down faster than experts thought it should have. Unfortunately, while it's wreck is more accessible, it's a war memorial (so it's hard to get permits) and in bad shape, not only is it laying on the damaged side, but it also augered in, smashing the front section close to where the damage was.

Safety and comfort is rarely compatible, its always a compromise, that is especially true with passenger ships like ocean liners and cruise ships. Increasing the safety of the ship means taking away from the comfort provided to the passengers, you WILL have to make a compromise, that starts with things like using bulkheads in the first place. I don't think the white star line made a poor design decision there.

White Star didn't cut the bulkheads for passenger comfort, they cut them to save time and money. White Star was in financial trouble and were under pressure to compete with Cunard, who had just launched new, faster ships.
Novelkeys NK65AE w/62g Zilents/39g springs
More
62g Zilents/lubed/Novelkeys 39g springs, HK Gaming Thick PBT caps, Netdot Gen10 magnetic cable, pic
| Filco MJ2 L.E. Vortex Case, Jailhouse Blues, heavily customized
More
Vortex case squared up/blasted finish removed/custom feet/paint/winkey blockoff plate, HID Liberator, stainless steel universal plate, 3d printed adapters, Type C, Netdot Gen10 magnetic cable, foam sound dampened, HK Gaming Thick PBT caps (o-ringed), Cherry Jailhouse Blues w/lubed/clipped Cherry light springs, 40g actuation
| GMMK TKL
More
w/ Kailh Purple Pros/lubed/Novelkeys 39g springs, HK Gaming Thick PBT caps, Netdot Gen10 Magnetic cable
| PF65 3d printed 65% w/LCD and hot swap
More
Box Jades, Interchangeable trim, mini lcd, QMK, underglow, HK Gaming Thick PBT caps, O-rings, Netdot Gen10 magnetic cable, in progress link
| Magicforce 68
More
MF68 pcb, Outemu Blues, in progress
| YMDK75 Jail Housed Gateron Blues
More
J-spacers, YMDK Thick PBT, O-rings, SIP sockets
| KBT Race S L.E.
More
Ergo Clears, custom WASD caps
| Das Pro
More
Costar model with browns
| GH60
More
Cherry Blacks, custom 3d printed case
| Logitech Illumininated | IBM Model M (x2)
Definitive Omron Guide. | 3d printed Keyboard FAQ/Discussion

Offline katushkin

  • Too Keycool for School
  • * Elevated Elder
  • Posts: 3669
  • Location: Birmingham - Not Alabama
  • Just the guy
Re: Would you join a ride with a Titanic replica?
« Reply #21 on: Tue, 31 May 2016, 17:42:10 »
No thanks.

Only big ship I want to go on is a CVN-21.  :thumb:
Can we get them to build the Alps ten feet higher and get Cherry to pay for it?
Katushkin's Clearout | Twitter | Steam | Instagram| Discord - katushkin


Offline xtrafrood

  • formerly csmertx
  • * Elevated Elder
  • Posts: 2716
  • Location: Gainesville, FL
  • KA2 touchpad on top
    • csmertx.com
Re: Would you join a ride with a Titanic replica?
« Reply #23 on: Tue, 31 May 2016, 18:03:12 »
I can't breath underwater,  Can you ?

Sure can, for a whole two hours (A99 aquata breather). But that won't matter if we do this in freezing water..
(sold) Chris Schammert (Christopher Schammert)

Offline tp4tissue

  • * Destiny Supporter
  • Posts: 13720
  • Location: Official Geekhack Public Defender..
  • OmniExpert of: Rice, Top-Ramen, Ergodox, n Females
Re: Would you join a ride with a Titanic replica?
« Reply #24 on: Tue, 31 May 2016, 18:58:19 »
I can't breath underwater,  Can you ?

Sure can, for a whole two hours (A99 aquata breather). But that won't matter if we do this in freezing water..

I'm gonna wait till I evolve the gills from water world.

Offline Olumin

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 209
  • Location: "...that famous Texas part of Hamburg"
  • "Guy walks into a doctor's office..."
Re: Would you join a ride with a Titanic replica?
« Reply #25 on: Tue, 31 May 2016, 19:13:09 »

Offline Leslieann

  • * Elevated Elder
  • Posts: 4566
Re: Would you join a ride with a Titanic replica?
« Reply #26 on: Wed, 01 June 2016, 05:05:30 »
No thanks.

Only big ship I want to go on is a CVN-21.  :thumb:
Meh, I'd much prefer NCC-1701- D or NCC-74656
Novelkeys NK65AE w/62g Zilents/39g springs
More
62g Zilents/lubed/Novelkeys 39g springs, HK Gaming Thick PBT caps, Netdot Gen10 magnetic cable, pic
| Filco MJ2 L.E. Vortex Case, Jailhouse Blues, heavily customized
More
Vortex case squared up/blasted finish removed/custom feet/paint/winkey blockoff plate, HID Liberator, stainless steel universal plate, 3d printed adapters, Type C, Netdot Gen10 magnetic cable, foam sound dampened, HK Gaming Thick PBT caps (o-ringed), Cherry Jailhouse Blues w/lubed/clipped Cherry light springs, 40g actuation
| GMMK TKL
More
w/ Kailh Purple Pros/lubed/Novelkeys 39g springs, HK Gaming Thick PBT caps, Netdot Gen10 Magnetic cable
| PF65 3d printed 65% w/LCD and hot swap
More
Box Jades, Interchangeable trim, mini lcd, QMK, underglow, HK Gaming Thick PBT caps, O-rings, Netdot Gen10 magnetic cable, in progress link
| Magicforce 68
More
MF68 pcb, Outemu Blues, in progress
| YMDK75 Jail Housed Gateron Blues
More
J-spacers, YMDK Thick PBT, O-rings, SIP sockets
| KBT Race S L.E.
More
Ergo Clears, custom WASD caps
| Das Pro
More
Costar model with browns
| GH60
More
Cherry Blacks, custom 3d printed case
| Logitech Illumininated | IBM Model M (x2)
Definitive Omron Guide. | 3d printed Keyboard FAQ/Discussion

Offline MOZ

  • KING OF THE NEWBIES
  • * Maker
  • Posts: 3981
  • Location: Jo'burg
  • Busy making stuff
Re: Would you join a ride with a Titanic replica?
« Reply #27 on: Wed, 01 June 2016, 05:27:28 »
Meh, I'd much prefer NCC-1701- D or NCC-74656

:)) Who wouldn't?

Offline tp4tissue

  • * Destiny Supporter
  • Posts: 13720
  • Location: Official Geekhack Public Defender..
  • OmniExpert of: Rice, Top-Ramen, Ergodox, n Females
Re: Would you join a ride with a Titanic replica?
« Reply #28 on: Wed, 01 June 2016, 08:10:07 »
Also,  the Titanic is quite small compared to modern Cruise ships..

It was probably very boring on the Titanic.. because they simply don't have the space for all the fun stuff.. 


Offline Olumin

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 209
  • Location: "...that famous Texas part of Hamburg"
  • "Guy walks into a doctor's office..."
Re: Would you join a ride with a Titanic replica?
« Reply #29 on: Wed, 01 June 2016, 08:23:09 »
Also,  the Titanic is quite small compared to modern Cruise ships..

It was probably very boring on the Titanic.. because they simply don't have the space for all the fun stuff.. 

Show Image


Yes, I also posted a diagram regarding that. The Titanic was a Ocean liner, which point it is to simply bring you to your destination. Today there are planes for that. Such a trip normally takes about 6 days, not weeks like in some cruise ships. Unlike on liners, the trip with a cruise ship is the destination itself.

Offline tp4tissue

  • * Destiny Supporter
  • Posts: 13720
  • Location: Official Geekhack Public Defender..
  • OmniExpert of: Rice, Top-Ramen, Ergodox, n Females
Re: Would you join a ride with a Titanic replica?
« Reply #30 on: Wed, 01 June 2016, 08:30:47 »
Also,  the Titanic is quite small compared to modern Cruise ships..

It was probably very boring on the Titanic.. because they simply don't have the space for all the fun stuff.. 

Show Image


Yes, I also posted a diagram regarding that. The Titanic was a Ocean liner, which point it is to simply bring you to your destination. Today there are planes for that. Such a trip normally takes about 6 days, not weeks like in some cruise ships. Unlike on liners, the trip with a cruise ship is the destination itself.

My most positive experience was the buffet..

I have a very vivid memory of a black-brother eating so much one day, he passed out and had to be carried out on a stretcher..  That's how good the buffet was...  All you can eat smoked salmon.

They never told us if he was ok..