Author Topic: Would we be more or less efficient with 4 arms?  (Read 14613 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rowdy

  • HHKB Hapster
  • * Erudite Elder
  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 21175
  • Location: melbourne.vic.au
  • Missed another sale.
Would we be more or less efficient with 4 arms?
« on: Tue, 06 September 2016, 15:08:05 »
It occurred to me this morning when making breakfast.  I had to make one trip to carry milk and bowl to the table, then a second for sugar and Weet-Bix (they were all full and heavy - it would have been hazardous to carry three or more at once).

If I had 4 arms I could have carried them all in one go, and saved myself two trips (before and after brekky) each day.

Pros:
  • Easier to carry more things around
  • More fun and complicated sports

Cons:
  • Takes longer to get dressed
  • Even more awkward to sleep

Thoughts?
"Because keyboards are accessories to PC makers, they focus on minimizing the manufacturing costs. But that’s incorrect. It’s in HHKB’s slogan, but when America’s cowboys were in the middle of a trip and their horse died, they would leave the horse there. But even if they were in the middle of a desert, they would take their saddle with them. The horse was a consumable good, but the saddle was an interface that their bodies had gotten used to. In the same vein, PCs are consumable goods, while keyboards are important interfaces." - Eiiti Wada

NEC APC-H4100E | Ducky DK9008 Shine MX blue LED red | Ducky DK9008 Shine MX blue LED green | Link 900243-08 | CM QFR MX black | KeyCool 87 white MX reds | HHKB 2 Pro | Model M 02-Mar-1993 | Model M 29-Nov-1995 | CM Trigger (broken) | CM QFS MX green | Ducky DK9087 Shine 3 TKL Yellow Edition MX black | Lexmark SSK 21-Apr-1994 | IBM SSK 13-Oct-1987 | CODE TKL MX clear | Model M 122 01-Jun-1988

Ị̸͚̯̲́ͤ̃͑̇̑ͯ̊̂͟ͅs̞͚̩͉̝̪̲͗͊ͪ̽̚̚ ̭̦͖͕̑́͌ͬͩ͟t̷̻͔̙̑͟h̹̠̼͋ͤ͋i̤̜̣̦̱̫͈͔̞ͭ͑ͥ̌̔s̬͔͎̍̈ͥͫ̐̾ͣ̔̇͘ͅ ̩̘̼͆̐̕e̞̰͓̲̺̎͐̏ͬ̓̅̾͠͝ͅv̶̰͕̱̞̥̍ͣ̄̕e͕͙͖̬̜͓͎̤̊ͭ͐͝ṇ̰͎̱̤̟̭ͫ͌̌͢͠ͅ ̳̥̦ͮ̐ͤ̎̊ͣ͡͡n̤̜̙̺̪̒͜e̶̻̦̿ͮ̂̀c̝̘̝͖̠̖͐ͨͪ̈̐͌ͩ̀e̷̥͇̋ͦs̢̡̤ͤͤͯ͜s͈̠̉̑͘a̱͕̗͖̳̥̺ͬͦͧ͆̌̑͡r̶̟̖̈͘ỷ̮̦̩͙͔ͫ̾ͬ̔ͬͮ̌?̵̘͇͔͙ͥͪ͞ͅ

Offline Halverson

  • Traitor Supreme
  • Posts: 6811
  • GIRLSHARK WIZBRO
Re: Would we be more or less efficient with 4 arms?
« Reply #1 on: Tue, 06 September 2016, 15:18:02 »
Are you picking up the slack since tp is muted?

On topic, all I can think of is Goro from mortal kombat. We could be fighting kings.

Offline chyros

  • a.k.a. Thomas
  • * Esteemed Elder
  • Posts: 3499
  • Location: The Netherlands
  • Hello and welcome.
Re: Would we be more or less efficient with 4 arms?
« Reply #2 on: Tue, 06 September 2016, 16:13:14 »
Probably less efficient, because we don't have them.
Check my keyboard video reviews:


Offline tjcaustin

  • King Klaxon
  • * Maker
  • Posts: 3557
  • Location: Dallas-ish
  • King of All Klaxon Sciences and Cable Makery
    • Buy stuff
Re: Would we be more or less efficient with 4 arms?
« Reply #3 on: Tue, 06 September 2016, 16:14:58 »
Or, and stay with me here, you could pour the cereal and milk into the bowl in the kitchen on the counter and carry the sugar and cereal-filled bowl to the table.

Offline suicidal_orange

  • * Global Moderator
  • Posts: 4771
  • Location: England
Re: Would we be more or less efficient with 4 arms?
« Reply #4 on: Tue, 06 September 2016, 16:24:32 »
Two hands for keyboard, one for mouse and one spare to move papers, sign things, answer the phone...  Can't see any argument against bonus arms in an office environment.  Would be great for soldering too - two hands to hold parts, one to hold the iron and one for the solder.

My only hesitation is could we make maximum use of them with only one set of eyes?

  • Even more awkward to sleep

This makes it sound like you already have problems sleeping and blame them on having arms?!
120/100g linear Zealio R1  
GMK Hyperfuse
'Split everything' perfection  
MX Clear
SA Hack'd by Geeks     
EasyAVR mod

Offline rowdy

  • HHKB Hapster
  • * Erudite Elder
  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 21175
  • Location: melbourne.vic.au
  • Missed another sale.
Re: Would we be more or less efficient with 4 arms?
« Reply #5 on: Tue, 06 September 2016, 18:59:26 »
Are you picking up the slack since tp is muted?

On topic, all I can think of is Goro from mortal kombat. We could be fighting kings.

Maybe.
"Because keyboards are accessories to PC makers, they focus on minimizing the manufacturing costs. But that’s incorrect. It’s in HHKB’s slogan, but when America’s cowboys were in the middle of a trip and their horse died, they would leave the horse there. But even if they were in the middle of a desert, they would take their saddle with them. The horse was a consumable good, but the saddle was an interface that their bodies had gotten used to. In the same vein, PCs are consumable goods, while keyboards are important interfaces." - Eiiti Wada

NEC APC-H4100E | Ducky DK9008 Shine MX blue LED red | Ducky DK9008 Shine MX blue LED green | Link 900243-08 | CM QFR MX black | KeyCool 87 white MX reds | HHKB 2 Pro | Model M 02-Mar-1993 | Model M 29-Nov-1995 | CM Trigger (broken) | CM QFS MX green | Ducky DK9087 Shine 3 TKL Yellow Edition MX black | Lexmark SSK 21-Apr-1994 | IBM SSK 13-Oct-1987 | CODE TKL MX clear | Model M 122 01-Jun-1988

Ị̸͚̯̲́ͤ̃͑̇̑ͯ̊̂͟ͅs̞͚̩͉̝̪̲͗͊ͪ̽̚̚ ̭̦͖͕̑́͌ͬͩ͟t̷̻͔̙̑͟h̹̠̼͋ͤ͋i̤̜̣̦̱̫͈͔̞ͭ͑ͥ̌̔s̬͔͎̍̈ͥͫ̐̾ͣ̔̇͘ͅ ̩̘̼͆̐̕e̞̰͓̲̺̎͐̏ͬ̓̅̾͠͝ͅv̶̰͕̱̞̥̍ͣ̄̕e͕͙͖̬̜͓͎̤̊ͭ͐͝ṇ̰͎̱̤̟̭ͫ͌̌͢͠ͅ ̳̥̦ͮ̐ͤ̎̊ͣ͡͡n̤̜̙̺̪̒͜e̶̻̦̿ͮ̂̀c̝̘̝͖̠̖͐ͨͪ̈̐͌ͩ̀e̷̥͇̋ͦs̢̡̤ͤͤͯ͜s͈̠̉̑͘a̱͕̗͖̳̥̺ͬͦͧ͆̌̑͡r̶̟̖̈͘ỷ̮̦̩͙͔ͫ̾ͬ̔ͬͮ̌?̵̘͇͔͙ͥͪ͞ͅ

Offline rowdy

  • HHKB Hapster
  • * Erudite Elder
  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 21175
  • Location: melbourne.vic.au
  • Missed another sale.
Re: Would we be more or less efficient with 4 arms?
« Reply #6 on: Tue, 06 September 2016, 19:00:20 »
Probably less efficient, because we don't have them.

If we had 4 arms, we would have evolved to support and use them.

Our backs would be stronger and we would be able to carry heavier loads.

We would have extra muscles around the 4 shoulders.
"Because keyboards are accessories to PC makers, they focus on minimizing the manufacturing costs. But that’s incorrect. It’s in HHKB’s slogan, but when America’s cowboys were in the middle of a trip and their horse died, they would leave the horse there. But even if they were in the middle of a desert, they would take their saddle with them. The horse was a consumable good, but the saddle was an interface that their bodies had gotten used to. In the same vein, PCs are consumable goods, while keyboards are important interfaces." - Eiiti Wada

NEC APC-H4100E | Ducky DK9008 Shine MX blue LED red | Ducky DK9008 Shine MX blue LED green | Link 900243-08 | CM QFR MX black | KeyCool 87 white MX reds | HHKB 2 Pro | Model M 02-Mar-1993 | Model M 29-Nov-1995 | CM Trigger (broken) | CM QFS MX green | Ducky DK9087 Shine 3 TKL Yellow Edition MX black | Lexmark SSK 21-Apr-1994 | IBM SSK 13-Oct-1987 | CODE TKL MX clear | Model M 122 01-Jun-1988

Ị̸͚̯̲́ͤ̃͑̇̑ͯ̊̂͟ͅs̞͚̩͉̝̪̲͗͊ͪ̽̚̚ ̭̦͖͕̑́͌ͬͩ͟t̷̻͔̙̑͟h̹̠̼͋ͤ͋i̤̜̣̦̱̫͈͔̞ͭ͑ͥ̌̔s̬͔͎̍̈ͥͫ̐̾ͣ̔̇͘ͅ ̩̘̼͆̐̕e̞̰͓̲̺̎͐̏ͬ̓̅̾͠͝ͅv̶̰͕̱̞̥̍ͣ̄̕e͕͙͖̬̜͓͎̤̊ͭ͐͝ṇ̰͎̱̤̟̭ͫ͌̌͢͠ͅ ̳̥̦ͮ̐ͤ̎̊ͣ͡͡n̤̜̙̺̪̒͜e̶̻̦̿ͮ̂̀c̝̘̝͖̠̖͐ͨͪ̈̐͌ͩ̀e̷̥͇̋ͦs̢̡̤ͤͤͯ͜s͈̠̉̑͘a̱͕̗͖̳̥̺ͬͦͧ͆̌̑͡r̶̟̖̈͘ỷ̮̦̩͙͔ͫ̾ͬ̔ͬͮ̌?̵̘͇͔͙ͥͪ͞ͅ

Offline tp4tissue

  • * Destiny Supporter
  • Posts: 13723
  • Location: Official Geekhack Public Defender..
  • OmniExpert of: Rice, Top-Ramen, Ergodox, n Females
Re: Would we be more or less efficient with 4 arms?
« Reply #7 on: Tue, 06 September 2016, 19:00:30 »
You're talking about increasing brain mass by another 10-20%  for the control circuit to happen.

THAT IS MAJOR..

Offline rowdy

  • HHKB Hapster
  • * Erudite Elder
  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 21175
  • Location: melbourne.vic.au
  • Missed another sale.
Re: Would we be more or less efficient with 4 arms?
« Reply #8 on: Tue, 06 September 2016, 19:01:32 »
Or, and stay with me here, you could pour the cereal and milk into the bowl in the kitchen on the counter and carry the sugar and cereal-filled bowl to the table.

I have 2 Weet-Bix and milk and sugar first, eat them, then have 2 more.  Putting all 4 in the bowl at once means the ones on the bottom get too soggy, and the ones on the top are too dry.

Plus there's the spoon.
"Because keyboards are accessories to PC makers, they focus on minimizing the manufacturing costs. But that’s incorrect. It’s in HHKB’s slogan, but when America’s cowboys were in the middle of a trip and their horse died, they would leave the horse there. But even if they were in the middle of a desert, they would take their saddle with them. The horse was a consumable good, but the saddle was an interface that their bodies had gotten used to. In the same vein, PCs are consumable goods, while keyboards are important interfaces." - Eiiti Wada

NEC APC-H4100E | Ducky DK9008 Shine MX blue LED red | Ducky DK9008 Shine MX blue LED green | Link 900243-08 | CM QFR MX black | KeyCool 87 white MX reds | HHKB 2 Pro | Model M 02-Mar-1993 | Model M 29-Nov-1995 | CM Trigger (broken) | CM QFS MX green | Ducky DK9087 Shine 3 TKL Yellow Edition MX black | Lexmark SSK 21-Apr-1994 | IBM SSK 13-Oct-1987 | CODE TKL MX clear | Model M 122 01-Jun-1988

Ị̸͚̯̲́ͤ̃͑̇̑ͯ̊̂͟ͅs̞͚̩͉̝̪̲͗͊ͪ̽̚̚ ̭̦͖͕̑́͌ͬͩ͟t̷̻͔̙̑͟h̹̠̼͋ͤ͋i̤̜̣̦̱̫͈͔̞ͭ͑ͥ̌̔s̬͔͎̍̈ͥͫ̐̾ͣ̔̇͘ͅ ̩̘̼͆̐̕e̞̰͓̲̺̎͐̏ͬ̓̅̾͠͝ͅv̶̰͕̱̞̥̍ͣ̄̕e͕͙͖̬̜͓͎̤̊ͭ͐͝ṇ̰͎̱̤̟̭ͫ͌̌͢͠ͅ ̳̥̦ͮ̐ͤ̎̊ͣ͡͡n̤̜̙̺̪̒͜e̶̻̦̿ͮ̂̀c̝̘̝͖̠̖͐ͨͪ̈̐͌ͩ̀e̷̥͇̋ͦs̢̡̤ͤͤͯ͜s͈̠̉̑͘a̱͕̗͖̳̥̺ͬͦͧ͆̌̑͡r̶̟̖̈͘ỷ̮̦̩͙͔ͫ̾ͬ̔ͬͮ̌?̵̘͇͔͙ͥͪ͞ͅ

Offline tp4tissue

  • * Destiny Supporter
  • Posts: 13723
  • Location: Official Geekhack Public Defender..
  • OmniExpert of: Rice, Top-Ramen, Ergodox, n Females
Re: Would we be more or less efficient with 4 arms?
« Reply #9 on: Tue, 06 September 2016, 19:02:30 »
For many of the -mathematical- savants,  what happens is a form of synthesia, where some of the normal connections in their brain is broken, and More brain space becomes available for analytical processing..  giving them immense processing power and RAM..

So,  I'd imagine if we had the tech to increase brain mass... we'd probably use it for something other than more arms.

Offline rowdy

  • HHKB Hapster
  • * Erudite Elder
  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 21175
  • Location: melbourne.vic.au
  • Missed another sale.
Re: Would we be more or less efficient with 4 arms?
« Reply #10 on: Tue, 06 September 2016, 19:02:33 »
  • Even more awkward to sleep

This makes it sound like you already have problems sleeping and blame them on having arms?!

My arm goes dead sometimes if I lie on it for too long.
"Because keyboards are accessories to PC makers, they focus on minimizing the manufacturing costs. But that’s incorrect. It’s in HHKB’s slogan, but when America’s cowboys were in the middle of a trip and their horse died, they would leave the horse there. But even if they were in the middle of a desert, they would take their saddle with them. The horse was a consumable good, but the saddle was an interface that their bodies had gotten used to. In the same vein, PCs are consumable goods, while keyboards are important interfaces." - Eiiti Wada

NEC APC-H4100E | Ducky DK9008 Shine MX blue LED red | Ducky DK9008 Shine MX blue LED green | Link 900243-08 | CM QFR MX black | KeyCool 87 white MX reds | HHKB 2 Pro | Model M 02-Mar-1993 | Model M 29-Nov-1995 | CM Trigger (broken) | CM QFS MX green | Ducky DK9087 Shine 3 TKL Yellow Edition MX black | Lexmark SSK 21-Apr-1994 | IBM SSK 13-Oct-1987 | CODE TKL MX clear | Model M 122 01-Jun-1988

Ị̸͚̯̲́ͤ̃͑̇̑ͯ̊̂͟ͅs̞͚̩͉̝̪̲͗͊ͪ̽̚̚ ̭̦͖͕̑́͌ͬͩ͟t̷̻͔̙̑͟h̹̠̼͋ͤ͋i̤̜̣̦̱̫͈͔̞ͭ͑ͥ̌̔s̬͔͎̍̈ͥͫ̐̾ͣ̔̇͘ͅ ̩̘̼͆̐̕e̞̰͓̲̺̎͐̏ͬ̓̅̾͠͝ͅv̶̰͕̱̞̥̍ͣ̄̕e͕͙͖̬̜͓͎̤̊ͭ͐͝ṇ̰͎̱̤̟̭ͫ͌̌͢͠ͅ ̳̥̦ͮ̐ͤ̎̊ͣ͡͡n̤̜̙̺̪̒͜e̶̻̦̿ͮ̂̀c̝̘̝͖̠̖͐ͨͪ̈̐͌ͩ̀e̷̥͇̋ͦs̢̡̤ͤͤͯ͜s͈̠̉̑͘a̱͕̗͖̳̥̺ͬͦͧ͆̌̑͡r̶̟̖̈͘ỷ̮̦̩͙͔ͫ̾ͬ̔ͬͮ̌?̵̘͇͔͙ͥͪ͞ͅ

Offline rowdy

  • HHKB Hapster
  • * Erudite Elder
  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 21175
  • Location: melbourne.vic.au
  • Missed another sale.
Re: Would we be more or less efficient with 4 arms?
« Reply #11 on: Tue, 06 September 2016, 19:04:39 »
You're talking about increasing brain mass by another 10-20%  for the control circuit to happen.

THAT IS MAJOR..

Hello tp4, welcome to my off topic thread.

I don't think we use 10-20% of our brain to control the two arms that we have now.

It would probably only be another 2-5%.

Plus the upper torso would probably be a bit bigger to cater for the increased bone and muscle complexity, so a little more brain up there wouldn't be unwelcome.
"Because keyboards are accessories to PC makers, they focus on minimizing the manufacturing costs. But that’s incorrect. It’s in HHKB’s slogan, but when America’s cowboys were in the middle of a trip and their horse died, they would leave the horse there. But even if they were in the middle of a desert, they would take their saddle with them. The horse was a consumable good, but the saddle was an interface that their bodies had gotten used to. In the same vein, PCs are consumable goods, while keyboards are important interfaces." - Eiiti Wada

NEC APC-H4100E | Ducky DK9008 Shine MX blue LED red | Ducky DK9008 Shine MX blue LED green | Link 900243-08 | CM QFR MX black | KeyCool 87 white MX reds | HHKB 2 Pro | Model M 02-Mar-1993 | Model M 29-Nov-1995 | CM Trigger (broken) | CM QFS MX green | Ducky DK9087 Shine 3 TKL Yellow Edition MX black | Lexmark SSK 21-Apr-1994 | IBM SSK 13-Oct-1987 | CODE TKL MX clear | Model M 122 01-Jun-1988

Ị̸͚̯̲́ͤ̃͑̇̑ͯ̊̂͟ͅs̞͚̩͉̝̪̲͗͊ͪ̽̚̚ ̭̦͖͕̑́͌ͬͩ͟t̷̻͔̙̑͟h̹̠̼͋ͤ͋i̤̜̣̦̱̫͈͔̞ͭ͑ͥ̌̔s̬͔͎̍̈ͥͫ̐̾ͣ̔̇͘ͅ ̩̘̼͆̐̕e̞̰͓̲̺̎͐̏ͬ̓̅̾͠͝ͅv̶̰͕̱̞̥̍ͣ̄̕e͕͙͖̬̜͓͎̤̊ͭ͐͝ṇ̰͎̱̤̟̭ͫ͌̌͢͠ͅ ̳̥̦ͮ̐ͤ̎̊ͣ͡͡n̤̜̙̺̪̒͜e̶̻̦̿ͮ̂̀c̝̘̝͖̠̖͐ͨͪ̈̐͌ͩ̀e̷̥͇̋ͦs̢̡̤ͤͤͯ͜s͈̠̉̑͘a̱͕̗͖̳̥̺ͬͦͧ͆̌̑͡r̶̟̖̈͘ỷ̮̦̩͙͔ͫ̾ͬ̔ͬͮ̌?̵̘͇͔͙ͥͪ͞ͅ

Offline xtrafrood

  • formerly csmertx
  • * Elevated Elder
  • Posts: 2716
  • Location: Gainesville, FL
  • KA2 touchpad on top
    • csmertx.com
Re: Would we be more or less efficient with 4 arms?
« Reply #12 on: Tue, 06 September 2016, 19:04:54 »
Two hands to drop things randomly and two hands to catch random objects that were dropped? I'm down. I'll take a few extra limbs
(sold) Chris Schammert (Christopher Schammert)

Offline tp4tissue

  • * Destiny Supporter
  • Posts: 13723
  • Location: Official Geekhack Public Defender..
  • OmniExpert of: Rice, Top-Ramen, Ergodox, n Females
Re: Would we be more or less efficient with 4 arms?
« Reply #13 on: Tue, 06 September 2016, 19:05:50 »
Two hands to drop things randomly and two hands to catch random objects that were dropped? I'm down. I'll take a few extra limbs


I'd rather have more eyes..  or more fingers,  I don't think we need more arms.

Offline fohat.digs

  • * Elevated Elder
  • Posts: 6533
  • Location: 35°55'N, 83°53'W
  • weird funny old guy
Re: Would we be more or less efficient with 4 arms?
« Reply #14 on: Tue, 06 September 2016, 19:16:16 »
Why think small?
From the US Constitution, Article 1, Section 8 :

The   Congress   shall have Power
To declare War,  grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;
To provide for calling forth the Militia  to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

Offline tp4tissue

  • * Destiny Supporter
  • Posts: 13723
  • Location: Official Geekhack Public Defender..
  • OmniExpert of: Rice, Top-Ramen, Ergodox, n Females
Re: Would we be more or less efficient with 4 arms?
« Reply #15 on: Tue, 06 September 2016, 19:19:13 »
You're talking about increasing brain mass by another 10-20%  for the control circuit to happen.

THAT IS MAJOR..

Hello tp4, welcome to my off topic thread.

I don't think we use 10-20% of our brain to control the two arms that we have now.

It would probably only be another 2-5%.

Plus the upper torso would probably be a bit bigger to cater for the increased bone and muscle complexity, so a little more brain up there wouldn't be unwelcome.

the actual control maybe 2-5,  but we also need more processing,  perhaps another multiplexer, another set of pre-emption processor,

I'd still say at least 10-20

Offline xtrafrood

  • formerly csmertx
  • * Elevated Elder
  • Posts: 2716
  • Location: Gainesville, FL
  • KA2 touchpad on top
    • csmertx.com
Re: Would we be more or less efficient with 4 arms?
« Reply #16 on: Tue, 06 September 2016, 19:25:24 »
Two hands to drop things randomly and two hands to catch random objects that were dropped? I'm down. I'll take a few extra limbs


I'd rather have more eyes..  or more fingers,  I don't think we need more arms.

I need more arms.
(sold) Chris Schammert (Christopher Schammert)

Offline tp4tissue

  • * Destiny Supporter
  • Posts: 13723
  • Location: Official Geekhack Public Defender..
  • OmniExpert of: Rice, Top-Ramen, Ergodox, n Females
Re: Would we be more or less efficient with 4 arms?
« Reply #17 on: Tue, 06 September 2016, 19:29:03 »
Two hands to drop things randomly and two hands to catch random objects that were dropped? I'm down. I'll take a few extra limbs


I'd rather have more eyes..  or more fingers,  I don't think we need more arms.

I need more arms.

now I'm / disappoint

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/explainer/2006/05/why_cant_i_use_my_third_arm.html

Offline Air tree

  • Better late than never ^-^
  • * Destiny Supporter
  • Posts: 2206
  • Location: Satellite Beach, FL
  • Formerly not demik
Re: Would we be more or less efficient with 4 arms?
« Reply #18 on: Tue, 06 September 2016, 19:29:36 »
4 arms would be amazing, multi tasking would be further improved, it's just a win win.


I've said this over and over, but if I had to choose either both my legs or arms cut off, legs would go any day. Legs are so easy to replace and replicate to at least somewhat similarly, but prosthetic arms at the moment are nowhere close to being comparable to a real one, unlike legs.



TLDR: arms > legs

Offline chyros

  • a.k.a. Thomas
  • * Esteemed Elder
  • Posts: 3499
  • Location: The Netherlands
  • Hello and welcome.
Re: Would we be more or less efficient with 4 arms?
« Reply #19 on: Tue, 06 September 2016, 19:32:04 »
Probably less efficient, because we don't have them.

If we had 4 arms, we would have evolved to support and use them.

Our backs would be stronger and we would be able to carry heavier loads.

We would have extra muscles around the 4 shoulders.
All of which costs a lot more physical and mental energy. Sure, we'd be able to do some things better, but my guess is that it wouldn't be overall more efficient.
Check my keyboard video reviews:


Offline tp4tissue

  • * Destiny Supporter
  • Posts: 13723
  • Location: Official Geekhack Public Defender..
  • OmniExpert of: Rice, Top-Ramen, Ergodox, n Females
Re: Would we be more or less efficient with 4 arms?
« Reply #20 on: Tue, 06 September 2016, 19:32:06 »
4 arms would be amazing, multi tasking would be further improved, it's just a win win.


I've said this over and over, but if I had to choose either both my legs or arms cut off, legs would go any day. Legs are so easy to replace and replicate to at least somewhat similarly, but prosthetic arms at the moment are nowhere close to being comparable to a real one, unlike legs.



TLDR: arms > legs


What about one leg, and one arm...

Offline Air tree

  • Better late than never ^-^
  • * Destiny Supporter
  • Posts: 2206
  • Location: Satellite Beach, FL
  • Formerly not demik
Re: Would we be more or less efficient with 4 arms?
« Reply #21 on: Tue, 06 September 2016, 19:38:59 »
4 arms would be amazing, multi tasking would be further improved, it's just a win win.


I've said this over and over, but if I had to choose either both my legs or arms cut off, legs would go any day. Legs are so easy to replace and replicate to at least somewhat similarly, but prosthetic arms at the moment are nowhere close to being comparable to a real one, unlike legs.



TLDR: arms > legs


What about one leg, and one arm...
if I was forced to chose between losing one of my arms or both of my legs, I'd choose both legs.


I do a lot more things with my arms that would be hard to replicate with our current robotic arms

Offline tp4tissue

  • * Destiny Supporter
  • Posts: 13723
  • Location: Official Geekhack Public Defender..
  • OmniExpert of: Rice, Top-Ramen, Ergodox, n Females
Re: Would we be more or less efficient with 4 arms?
« Reply #22 on: Tue, 06 September 2016, 19:39:28 »
Oh.. small FYI guys,  careful googling amputee, I just did, bad stuff comes up..

Offline Computer-Lab in Basement

  • The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few.
  • * Elevated Elder
  • Posts: 3026
  • Location: NCC-1701, USS Enterprise
  • Live long and prosper
Re: Would we be more or less efficient with 4 arms?
« Reply #23 on: Tue, 06 September 2016, 20:02:47 »
It's bad enough waking up with two dead arms (this happens to me at least once a month) so I can't imagine having that happen with four, that'd be 2x the amount of pins-and-needles feelings.
tp thread is tp thread
Sometimes it's like he accidentally makes a thread instead of a google search.

IBM Model M SSK | IBM Model F XT | IBM Model F 122 | IBM Model M 122 | Ducky YOTD 2012 w/ blue switches | Poker II w/ Blue switches | Royal Kludge RK61 w/ Blue switches

Offline tp4tissue

  • * Destiny Supporter
  • Posts: 13723
  • Location: Official Geekhack Public Defender..
  • OmniExpert of: Rice, Top-Ramen, Ergodox, n Females
Re: Would we be more or less efficient with 4 arms?
« Reply #24 on: Tue, 06 September 2016, 20:04:34 »
It's bad enough waking up with two dead arms (this happens to me at least once a month) so I can't imagine having that happen with four, that'd be 2x the amount of pins-and-needles feelings.

that's not good..  if you wake up with 2 dead arms,  unless you're morbidly obese, then your arms are seriously misaligned while you sleep , 

Offline rowdy

  • HHKB Hapster
  • * Erudite Elder
  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 21175
  • Location: melbourne.vic.au
  • Missed another sale.
Re: Would we be more or less efficient with 4 arms?
« Reply #25 on: Tue, 06 September 2016, 20:09:02 »
I had pins and needles in both feet yestreen, but that's another story.

A good point from chyros - if we had evolved with 4 arms we wouldn't know any different, and this thread would probably be discussing the possibility of having 6 arms.

Or just the 2 - that would be funny :))
"Because keyboards are accessories to PC makers, they focus on minimizing the manufacturing costs. But that’s incorrect. It’s in HHKB’s slogan, but when America’s cowboys were in the middle of a trip and their horse died, they would leave the horse there. But even if they were in the middle of a desert, they would take their saddle with them. The horse was a consumable good, but the saddle was an interface that their bodies had gotten used to. In the same vein, PCs are consumable goods, while keyboards are important interfaces." - Eiiti Wada

NEC APC-H4100E | Ducky DK9008 Shine MX blue LED red | Ducky DK9008 Shine MX blue LED green | Link 900243-08 | CM QFR MX black | KeyCool 87 white MX reds | HHKB 2 Pro | Model M 02-Mar-1993 | Model M 29-Nov-1995 | CM Trigger (broken) | CM QFS MX green | Ducky DK9087 Shine 3 TKL Yellow Edition MX black | Lexmark SSK 21-Apr-1994 | IBM SSK 13-Oct-1987 | CODE TKL MX clear | Model M 122 01-Jun-1988

Ị̸͚̯̲́ͤ̃͑̇̑ͯ̊̂͟ͅs̞͚̩͉̝̪̲͗͊ͪ̽̚̚ ̭̦͖͕̑́͌ͬͩ͟t̷̻͔̙̑͟h̹̠̼͋ͤ͋i̤̜̣̦̱̫͈͔̞ͭ͑ͥ̌̔s̬͔͎̍̈ͥͫ̐̾ͣ̔̇͘ͅ ̩̘̼͆̐̕e̞̰͓̲̺̎͐̏ͬ̓̅̾͠͝ͅv̶̰͕̱̞̥̍ͣ̄̕e͕͙͖̬̜͓͎̤̊ͭ͐͝ṇ̰͎̱̤̟̭ͫ͌̌͢͠ͅ ̳̥̦ͮ̐ͤ̎̊ͣ͡͡n̤̜̙̺̪̒͜e̶̻̦̿ͮ̂̀c̝̘̝͖̠̖͐ͨͪ̈̐͌ͩ̀e̷̥͇̋ͦs̢̡̤ͤͤͯ͜s͈̠̉̑͘a̱͕̗͖̳̥̺ͬͦͧ͆̌̑͡r̶̟̖̈͘ỷ̮̦̩͙͔ͫ̾ͬ̔ͬͮ̌?̵̘͇͔͙ͥͪ͞ͅ

Offline Computer-Lab in Basement

  • The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few.
  • * Elevated Elder
  • Posts: 3026
  • Location: NCC-1701, USS Enterprise
  • Live long and prosper
Re: Would we be more or less efficient with 4 arms?
« Reply #26 on: Tue, 06 September 2016, 20:12:26 »
It's bad enough waking up with two dead arms (this happens to me at least once a month) so I can't imagine having that happen with four, that'd be 2x the amount of pins-and-needles feelings.

that's not good..  if you wake up with 2 dead arms,  unless you're morbidly obese, then your arms are seriously misaligned while you sleep , 

Whenever it's happened, they are fine when I go to sleep, but at some point in my sleep I roll over onto them.
tp thread is tp thread
Sometimes it's like he accidentally makes a thread instead of a google search.

IBM Model M SSK | IBM Model F XT | IBM Model F 122 | IBM Model M 122 | Ducky YOTD 2012 w/ blue switches | Poker II w/ Blue switches | Royal Kludge RK61 w/ Blue switches

Offline tp4tissue

  • * Destiny Supporter
  • Posts: 13723
  • Location: Official Geekhack Public Defender..
  • OmniExpert of: Rice, Top-Ramen, Ergodox, n Females
Re: Would we be more or less efficient with 4 arms?
« Reply #27 on: Tue, 06 September 2016, 20:13:11 »
I had pins and needles in both feet yestreen, but that's another story.

A good point from chyros - if we had evolved with 4 arms we wouldn't know any different, and this thread would probably be discussing the possibility of having 6 arms.

Or just the 2 - that would be funny :))

it's definitely possible.. to have 4 arms,  but we'd have to completely overhaul many things to support 2 extra arms..


Brain area aside,  arms are heavy,  so the rest of the body is not designed to anatomically support them. 

Probably wouldn't attach them at the shoulders.. .. most likely the chest or lower ribs


Offline Elrick

  • Hype Master
  • Posts: 4895
  • Location: CrapTown, Convict Settlement
  • Keyboard Orgasmist
Re: Would we be more or less efficient with 4 arms?
« Reply #28 on: Tue, 06 September 2016, 23:58:51 »
If I had 4 arms I could have carried them all in one go, and saved myself two trips (before and after brekky) each day.

Pros:
  • Easier to carry more things around
  • More fun and complicated sports
Thoughts?

If that was possible, then your next upgrade would be to have 4 Genitals to play with  :-* .

Offline tp4tissue

  • * Destiny Supporter
  • Posts: 13723
  • Location: Official Geekhack Public Defender..
  • OmniExpert of: Rice, Top-Ramen, Ergodox, n Females
Re: Would we be more or less efficient with 4 arms?
« Reply #29 on: Wed, 07 September 2016, 00:01:24 »
If I had 4 arms I could have carried them all in one go, and saved myself two trips (before and after brekky) each day.

Pros:
  • Easier to carry more things around
  • More fun and complicated sports
Thoughts?

If that was possible, then your next upgrade would be to have 4 Genitals to play with  :-* .

Why would that be necessarily,   if such advanced modifications were possible,

Wouldn't you just install an orgasm key somewhere,  cherry mx preferably. 

Offline Elrick

  • Hype Master
  • Posts: 4895
  • Location: CrapTown, Convict Settlement
  • Keyboard Orgasmist
Re: Would we be more or less efficient with 4 arms?
« Reply #30 on: Wed, 07 September 2016, 02:03:47 »
Why would that be necessarily,   if such advanced modifications were possible,

Because WE need to perpetuate our species sunshine.  Imagine, a whole new four-armed race ready to conquer the WORLD  8) !

Offline tp4tissue

  • * Destiny Supporter
  • Posts: 13723
  • Location: Official Geekhack Public Defender..
  • OmniExpert of: Rice, Top-Ramen, Ergodox, n Females
Re: Would we be more or less efficient with 4 arms?
« Reply #31 on: Wed, 07 September 2016, 02:07:54 »
Why would that be necessarily,   if such advanced modifications were possible,

Because WE need to perpetuate our species sunshine.  Imagine, a whole new four-armed race ready to conquer the WORLD  8) !


If that were the case, you'd mod females to be much much larger, size of refrigerators, larger females who can produce more babies at once..

I don't see why you'd need more male parts,  because a small quantity of liquid is good for multiple fertile eggs

Offline fanpeople

  • Posts: 970
Re: Would we be more or less efficient with 4 arms?
« Reply #32 on: Wed, 07 September 2016, 04:16:06 »
Four arms would make my weekly gangbang much more efficiant


Offline dgneo

  • Supervillain
  • * Curator
  • Posts: 2183
Re: Would we be more or less efficient with 4 arms?
« Reply #34 on: Wed, 07 September 2016, 05:22:08 »
Four arms would make my weekly gangbang much more efficiant


Offline Elrick

  • Hype Master
  • Posts: 4895
  • Location: CrapTown, Convict Settlement
  • Keyboard Orgasmist
Re: Would we be more or less efficient with 4 arms?
« Reply #35 on: Wed, 07 September 2016, 05:37:02 »
If that were the case, you'd mod females to be much much larger, size of refrigerators, larger females who can produce more babies at once..

I don't see why you'd need more male parts,  because a small quantity of liquid is good for multiple fertile eggs

Geez louise, why would you ever need to mod any females  ??? ?

Keep them as they are because having four genitals (men) means doing four chicks at the same time.  Every pubescent's ultimate dream, to do four women but instead of denying three women your prong you can do all four at the same time.

You see where I'm heading with this, far more efficient delivery of your seed by four times the rate.  Gangbang takes on a whole new perspective here because no longer will you see women sitting on the sidelines missing out on getting banged.  In fact they won't be missing out on anything but breaks and recovery time from all that long session of love making.
« Last Edit: Wed, 07 September 2016, 05:38:47 by Elrick »

Offline chyros

  • a.k.a. Thomas
  • * Esteemed Elder
  • Posts: 3499
  • Location: The Netherlands
  • Hello and welcome.
Re: Would we be more or less efficient with 4 arms?
« Reply #36 on: Wed, 07 September 2016, 05:39:50 »
Four arms would make my weekly gangbang much more efficiant

wow, weekly.. endurance ++
Nah man, endurance is when you just get with someone and you screw like rabbits constantly, every day xD .
Check my keyboard video reviews:


Offline rowdy

  • HHKB Hapster
  • * Erudite Elder
  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 21175
  • Location: melbourne.vic.au
  • Missed another sale.
Re: Would we be more or less efficient with 4 arms?
« Reply #37 on: Wed, 07 September 2016, 06:13:07 »
I had pins and needles in both feet yestreen, but that's another story.

A good point from chyros - if we had evolved with 4 arms we wouldn't know any different, and this thread would probably be discussing the possibility of having 6 arms.

Or just the 2 - that would be funny :))

it's definitely possible.. to have 4 arms,  but we'd have to completely overhaul many things to support 2 extra arms..


Brain area aside,  arms are heavy,  so the rest of the body is not designed to anatomically support them. 

Probably wouldn't attach them at the shoulders.. .. most likely the chest or lower ribs

I'm kinda implying that we evolved with 4 arms, and thus the rest of the body to support them.
"Because keyboards are accessories to PC makers, they focus on minimizing the manufacturing costs. But that’s incorrect. It’s in HHKB’s slogan, but when America’s cowboys were in the middle of a trip and their horse died, they would leave the horse there. But even if they were in the middle of a desert, they would take their saddle with them. The horse was a consumable good, but the saddle was an interface that their bodies had gotten used to. In the same vein, PCs are consumable goods, while keyboards are important interfaces." - Eiiti Wada

NEC APC-H4100E | Ducky DK9008 Shine MX blue LED red | Ducky DK9008 Shine MX blue LED green | Link 900243-08 | CM QFR MX black | KeyCool 87 white MX reds | HHKB 2 Pro | Model M 02-Mar-1993 | Model M 29-Nov-1995 | CM Trigger (broken) | CM QFS MX green | Ducky DK9087 Shine 3 TKL Yellow Edition MX black | Lexmark SSK 21-Apr-1994 | IBM SSK 13-Oct-1987 | CODE TKL MX clear | Model M 122 01-Jun-1988

Ị̸͚̯̲́ͤ̃͑̇̑ͯ̊̂͟ͅs̞͚̩͉̝̪̲͗͊ͪ̽̚̚ ̭̦͖͕̑́͌ͬͩ͟t̷̻͔̙̑͟h̹̠̼͋ͤ͋i̤̜̣̦̱̫͈͔̞ͭ͑ͥ̌̔s̬͔͎̍̈ͥͫ̐̾ͣ̔̇͘ͅ ̩̘̼͆̐̕e̞̰͓̲̺̎͐̏ͬ̓̅̾͠͝ͅv̶̰͕̱̞̥̍ͣ̄̕e͕͙͖̬̜͓͎̤̊ͭ͐͝ṇ̰͎̱̤̟̭ͫ͌̌͢͠ͅ ̳̥̦ͮ̐ͤ̎̊ͣ͡͡n̤̜̙̺̪̒͜e̶̻̦̿ͮ̂̀c̝̘̝͖̠̖͐ͨͪ̈̐͌ͩ̀e̷̥͇̋ͦs̢̡̤ͤͤͯ͜s͈̠̉̑͘a̱͕̗͖̳̥̺ͬͦͧ͆̌̑͡r̶̟̖̈͘ỷ̮̦̩͙͔ͫ̾ͬ̔ͬͮ̌?̵̘͇͔͙ͥͪ͞ͅ

Offline rowdy

  • HHKB Hapster
  • * Erudite Elder
  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 21175
  • Location: melbourne.vic.au
  • Missed another sale.
Re: Would we be more or less efficient with 4 arms?
« Reply #38 on: Wed, 07 September 2016, 06:13:51 »
If I had 4 arms I could have carried them all in one go, and saved myself two trips (before and after brekky) each day.

Pros:
  • Easier to carry more things around
  • More fun and complicated sports
Thoughts?

If that was possible, then your next upgrade would be to have 4 Genitals to play with  :-* .

Or four MOTAS with one set of genitals each.
"Because keyboards are accessories to PC makers, they focus on minimizing the manufacturing costs. But that’s incorrect. It’s in HHKB’s slogan, but when America’s cowboys were in the middle of a trip and their horse died, they would leave the horse there. But even if they were in the middle of a desert, they would take their saddle with them. The horse was a consumable good, but the saddle was an interface that their bodies had gotten used to. In the same vein, PCs are consumable goods, while keyboards are important interfaces." - Eiiti Wada

NEC APC-H4100E | Ducky DK9008 Shine MX blue LED red | Ducky DK9008 Shine MX blue LED green | Link 900243-08 | CM QFR MX black | KeyCool 87 white MX reds | HHKB 2 Pro | Model M 02-Mar-1993 | Model M 29-Nov-1995 | CM Trigger (broken) | CM QFS MX green | Ducky DK9087 Shine 3 TKL Yellow Edition MX black | Lexmark SSK 21-Apr-1994 | IBM SSK 13-Oct-1987 | CODE TKL MX clear | Model M 122 01-Jun-1988

Ị̸͚̯̲́ͤ̃͑̇̑ͯ̊̂͟ͅs̞͚̩͉̝̪̲͗͊ͪ̽̚̚ ̭̦͖͕̑́͌ͬͩ͟t̷̻͔̙̑͟h̹̠̼͋ͤ͋i̤̜̣̦̱̫͈͔̞ͭ͑ͥ̌̔s̬͔͎̍̈ͥͫ̐̾ͣ̔̇͘ͅ ̩̘̼͆̐̕e̞̰͓̲̺̎͐̏ͬ̓̅̾͠͝ͅv̶̰͕̱̞̥̍ͣ̄̕e͕͙͖̬̜͓͎̤̊ͭ͐͝ṇ̰͎̱̤̟̭ͫ͌̌͢͠ͅ ̳̥̦ͮ̐ͤ̎̊ͣ͡͡n̤̜̙̺̪̒͜e̶̻̦̿ͮ̂̀c̝̘̝͖̠̖͐ͨͪ̈̐͌ͩ̀e̷̥͇̋ͦs̢̡̤ͤͤͯ͜s͈̠̉̑͘a̱͕̗͖̳̥̺ͬͦͧ͆̌̑͡r̶̟̖̈͘ỷ̮̦̩͙͔ͫ̾ͬ̔ͬͮ̌?̵̘͇͔͙ͥͪ͞ͅ

Offline xtrafrood

  • formerly csmertx
  • * Elevated Elder
  • Posts: 2716
  • Location: Gainesville, FL
  • KA2 touchpad on top
    • csmertx.com
Re: Would we be more or less efficient with 4 arms?
« Reply #39 on: Wed, 07 September 2016, 07:28:45 »
Four arms would make my weekly gangbang much more efficiant

wow, weekly.. endurance ++
Nah man, endurance is when you just get with someone and you screw like rabbits constantly, every day xD .

 :eek:
(sold) Chris Schammert (Christopher Schammert)

Offline tp4tissue

  • * Destiny Supporter
  • Posts: 13723
  • Location: Official Geekhack Public Defender..
  • OmniExpert of: Rice, Top-Ramen, Ergodox, n Females
Re: Would we be more or less efficient with 4 arms?
« Reply #40 on: Wed, 07 September 2016, 11:42:45 »
If that were the case, you'd mod females to be much much larger, size of refrigerators, larger females who can produce more babies at once..

I don't see why you'd need more male parts,  because a small quantity of liquid is good for multiple fertile eggs

Geez louise, why would you ever need to mod any females  ??? ?

Keep them as they are because having four genitals (men) means doing four chicks at the same time.  Every pubescent's ultimate dream, to do four women but instead of denying three women your prong you can do all four at the same time.

You see where I'm heading with this, far more efficient delivery of your seed by four times the rate.  Gangbang takes on a whole new perspective here because no longer will you see women sitting on the sidelines missing out on getting banged.  In fact they won't be missing out on anything but breaks and recovery time from all that long session of love making.

oh come on... you know that wouldn't work... GEOMETRY.

Offline chyros

  • a.k.a. Thomas
  • * Esteemed Elder
  • Posts: 3499
  • Location: The Netherlands
  • Hello and welcome.
Re: Would we be more or less efficient with 4 arms?
« Reply #41 on: Wed, 07 September 2016, 14:11:10 »
If that were the case, you'd mod females to be much much larger, size of refrigerators, larger females who can produce more babies at once..

I don't see why you'd need more male parts,  because a small quantity of liquid is good for multiple fertile eggs

Geez louise, why would you ever need to mod any females  ??? ?

Keep them as they are because having four genitals (men) means doing four chicks at the same time.  Every pubescent's ultimate dream, to do four women but instead of denying three women your prong you can do all four at the same time.

You see where I'm heading with this, far more efficient delivery of your seed by four times the rate.  Gangbang takes on a whole new perspective here because no longer will you see women sitting on the sidelines missing out on getting banged.  In fact they won't be missing out on anything but breaks and recovery time from all that long session of love making.

oh come on... you know that wouldn't work... GEOMETRY.
Who says the genitals would all have to be in the same place?
Check my keyboard video reviews:


Offline xondat

  • i'm not a star
  • * Maker
  • Posts: 5366
  • Location: United Kingdom
Re: Would we be more or less efficient with 4 arms?
« Reply #42 on: Wed, 07 September 2016, 14:16:17 »
No headphone jack would be less efficient with 4 arms.

Offline rowdy

  • HHKB Hapster
  • * Erudite Elder
  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 21175
  • Location: melbourne.vic.au
  • Missed another sale.
Re: Would we be more or less efficient with 4 arms?
« Reply #43 on: Thu, 08 September 2016, 05:34:55 »
No headphone jack would be less efficient with 4 arms.

Wireless arms?
"Because keyboards are accessories to PC makers, they focus on minimizing the manufacturing costs. But that’s incorrect. It’s in HHKB’s slogan, but when America’s cowboys were in the middle of a trip and their horse died, they would leave the horse there. But even if they were in the middle of a desert, they would take their saddle with them. The horse was a consumable good, but the saddle was an interface that their bodies had gotten used to. In the same vein, PCs are consumable goods, while keyboards are important interfaces." - Eiiti Wada

NEC APC-H4100E | Ducky DK9008 Shine MX blue LED red | Ducky DK9008 Shine MX blue LED green | Link 900243-08 | CM QFR MX black | KeyCool 87 white MX reds | HHKB 2 Pro | Model M 02-Mar-1993 | Model M 29-Nov-1995 | CM Trigger (broken) | CM QFS MX green | Ducky DK9087 Shine 3 TKL Yellow Edition MX black | Lexmark SSK 21-Apr-1994 | IBM SSK 13-Oct-1987 | CODE TKL MX clear | Model M 122 01-Jun-1988

Ị̸͚̯̲́ͤ̃͑̇̑ͯ̊̂͟ͅs̞͚̩͉̝̪̲͗͊ͪ̽̚̚ ̭̦͖͕̑́͌ͬͩ͟t̷̻͔̙̑͟h̹̠̼͋ͤ͋i̤̜̣̦̱̫͈͔̞ͭ͑ͥ̌̔s̬͔͎̍̈ͥͫ̐̾ͣ̔̇͘ͅ ̩̘̼͆̐̕e̞̰͓̲̺̎͐̏ͬ̓̅̾͠͝ͅv̶̰͕̱̞̥̍ͣ̄̕e͕͙͖̬̜͓͎̤̊ͭ͐͝ṇ̰͎̱̤̟̭ͫ͌̌͢͠ͅ ̳̥̦ͮ̐ͤ̎̊ͣ͡͡n̤̜̙̺̪̒͜e̶̻̦̿ͮ̂̀c̝̘̝͖̠̖͐ͨͪ̈̐͌ͩ̀e̷̥͇̋ͦs̢̡̤ͤͤͯ͜s͈̠̉̑͘a̱͕̗͖̳̥̺ͬͦͧ͆̌̑͡r̶̟̖̈͘ỷ̮̦̩͙͔ͫ̾ͬ̔ͬͮ̌?̵̘͇͔͙ͥͪ͞ͅ

Offline duynguyenle

  • Posts: 1388
  • Location: UK - Midlands
  • Personal text? What personal text???
Re: Would we be more or less efficient with 4 arms?
« Reply #44 on: Sat, 10 September 2016, 04:23:42 »
No headphone jack would be less efficient with 4 arms.

Wireless arms?

I guess you would still need to plug them in for power/charging
| QFR            | Leeku 1800    | Raptor K1      | Dolch Pac

Offline bazh

  • * Exquisite Elder
  • Posts: 970
  • Location: Finland
Re: Would we be more or less efficient with 4 arms?
« Reply #45 on: Sat, 10 September 2016, 04:26:35 »
what about tail, what if we have a tail that can be trained to hold things...
HHKB Pro2 white

Newbie again

Offline BLaZe

  • Posts: 23
  • Location: France
Re: Would we be more or less efficient with 4 arms?
« Reply #46 on: Sat, 10 September 2016, 05:25:54 »
You can be a god at any sport combat.
And you'll be able to compet against korean players on starcraft  :thumb:

Offline rowdy

  • HHKB Hapster
  • * Erudite Elder
  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 21175
  • Location: melbourne.vic.au
  • Missed another sale.
Re: Would we be more or less efficient with 4 arms?
« Reply #47 on: Sun, 11 September 2016, 05:35:25 »
You can be a god at any sport combat.
And you'll be able to compet against korean players on starcraft  :thumb:


But everyone else would have 4 arms too - it would be the norm.
"Because keyboards are accessories to PC makers, they focus on minimizing the manufacturing costs. But that’s incorrect. It’s in HHKB’s slogan, but when America’s cowboys were in the middle of a trip and their horse died, they would leave the horse there. But even if they were in the middle of a desert, they would take their saddle with them. The horse was a consumable good, but the saddle was an interface that their bodies had gotten used to. In the same vein, PCs are consumable goods, while keyboards are important interfaces." - Eiiti Wada

NEC APC-H4100E | Ducky DK9008 Shine MX blue LED red | Ducky DK9008 Shine MX blue LED green | Link 900243-08 | CM QFR MX black | KeyCool 87 white MX reds | HHKB 2 Pro | Model M 02-Mar-1993 | Model M 29-Nov-1995 | CM Trigger (broken) | CM QFS MX green | Ducky DK9087 Shine 3 TKL Yellow Edition MX black | Lexmark SSK 21-Apr-1994 | IBM SSK 13-Oct-1987 | CODE TKL MX clear | Model M 122 01-Jun-1988

Ị̸͚̯̲́ͤ̃͑̇̑ͯ̊̂͟ͅs̞͚̩͉̝̪̲͗͊ͪ̽̚̚ ̭̦͖͕̑́͌ͬͩ͟t̷̻͔̙̑͟h̹̠̼͋ͤ͋i̤̜̣̦̱̫͈͔̞ͭ͑ͥ̌̔s̬͔͎̍̈ͥͫ̐̾ͣ̔̇͘ͅ ̩̘̼͆̐̕e̞̰͓̲̺̎͐̏ͬ̓̅̾͠͝ͅv̶̰͕̱̞̥̍ͣ̄̕e͕͙͖̬̜͓͎̤̊ͭ͐͝ṇ̰͎̱̤̟̭ͫ͌̌͢͠ͅ ̳̥̦ͮ̐ͤ̎̊ͣ͡͡n̤̜̙̺̪̒͜e̶̻̦̿ͮ̂̀c̝̘̝͖̠̖͐ͨͪ̈̐͌ͩ̀e̷̥͇̋ͦs̢̡̤ͤͤͯ͜s͈̠̉̑͘a̱͕̗͖̳̥̺ͬͦͧ͆̌̑͡r̶̟̖̈͘ỷ̮̦̩͙͔ͫ̾ͬ̔ͬͮ̌?̵̘͇͔͙ͥͪ͞ͅ

Offline tp4tissue

  • * Destiny Supporter
  • Posts: 13723
  • Location: Official Geekhack Public Defender..
  • OmniExpert of: Rice, Top-Ramen, Ergodox, n Females
Re: Would we be more or less efficient with 4 arms?
« Reply #48 on: Sun, 11 September 2016, 06:56:48 »
what about tail, what if we have a tail that can be trained to hold things...

Most animals don't have extremely dextrose tails ..

It's nothing like an elephant's trunk..

So I guess if maybe you'd have a modified tail that's similar to the elephant trunk where the tail would be..

I guess that's what you mean.

Offline xtrafrood

  • formerly csmertx
  • * Elevated Elder
  • Posts: 2716
  • Location: Gainesville, FL
  • KA2 touchpad on top
    • csmertx.com
Re: Would we be more or less efficient with 4 arms?
« Reply #49 on: Sun, 11 September 2016, 10:14:28 »
So I can have four elephant trunks instead of four arms? That's pretty cool
(sold) Chris Schammert (Christopher Schammert)