No, it is not..
When you're shafted of $100.. You deserve that amount back + interest..
THAT"S IT... You do not deserve to shame the person who owes you money.. You do not deserve to HARM that other person in any way.. You have NO CLAIM to any recourse OUTSIDE of the original OWED SUM of money + interest for late-payment..
FRAGILITY was WRONG for the late payment..
But his current demeanor is in response to the IMPROPER handling of this transgression..
User, -crimsonTofu- Should have went straight to paypal dispute, with the evidence at hand, which he had..
All this should've been handled PRIVATELY..
PRIVATLEY was going no where. I bet he was just hoping the guy would stop pming him and he would never have to pay back. Seeing that the guy had 0 posts on geek hack prior to this thread, he didn't have much leverage from the community to help him get the money. So he did what he could. By making his situation publicly aware, it put pressure on vag (oops) I mean frag to pay up.
In what way was Privately going no where..
Has -crimsonTofu- made a paypal dispute ?
EVEN if the payment was not marked for "service/ purchase", you can still create a dispute and speak with their team about the matter..
The public shaming itself also has no leverage.. LOOK AT WHAT"S HAPPENED..
If Fragility NOW decides to never pay it back.. HOW are you going to force him..
WTF has this imaginary wall-of-shame actually done...
He does not have to pay it back because Geekhack has shamed him..
He has to pay it back because it's the LAW..
The public-SHAMING is unjust and undeserved...